Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

ATR is Propeller-driven or turbo-jet engine ?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

ATR is Propeller-driven or turbo-jet engine ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th January 2009 | 07:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Aviation Student, Bangkok, Thailand
ATR is Propeller-driven or turbo-jet engine ?

Dear All,

According to ANNEX6 4.3.6 Fuel and Oil supply

What is ATR aircraft between "Propeller-driven aeroplane" or "Aeroplane equipped with jet engine" ?

Regards,
titipong is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2009 | 07:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
It is a propeller driven aircraft powered by Gas Turbine engines which run on Jet fuel.
Wizofoz is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2009 | 08:51
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Aviation Student, Bangkok, Thailand
Hi Wizofoz, the answer will effect to final reserve (30/45 min). which one ?
titipong is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2009 | 08:53
  #4 (permalink)  
dkz
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Sandpit
Propeller-driven aeroplane ... for the final reserve it counts the type of aircraft and the ATR is NOT a jet, it's prop driven.
dkz is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2009 | 12:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
From: Europe
That is strange, because we operate the B200 (also turboprop) with 30 mins final reserve.
bfisk is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2009 | 15:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
From: A few degrees South
Yes, but this is not an airline operation, is it?
latetonite is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2009 | 16:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 1
From: Playing Golf!
I know of many ATR and Dash operators that fly her with a 30 min reserve.

In many national regulations it is referred to as turbine powered, thus the ATR and the like would qualify for the 30 min reserve verses the 45 min.

PT6
PT6A is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2009 | 16:59
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 46
From: Between a rock and a hard place
EU-OPS divides into piston engine (45 min) and turbine engine (30 min) final reserve.
172_driver is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd February 2009 | 18:51
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: Mumbai, INDIA
Correct term:- TURBOPROP.
regds
MEL...
HAWK21M is offline  
Reply
Old 4th February 2009 | 02:43
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
Marketing term: PROPJET
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th February 2009 | 10:29
  #11 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: San Vito dei Normanni
If this is the case what is a single engine turbo-prop conducting air services in EASA land meant to carry as Final Reserve?


I'm going to look it up now, damn!
walu is offline  
Reply
Old 6th February 2009 | 11:00
  #12 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,332
Likes: 486
From: England
Actually. it is a very-high bypass unducted fan.
Herod is offline  
Reply
Old 6th February 2009 | 11:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: biggar
30 min hoding at 1500 above alternate + fuel to get from goaround at destination to said aternate at the planned alt/FL.

Note: no 5% added! dbee
dbee is offline  
Reply
Old 6th February 2009 | 13:03
  #14 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
Actually. it is a very-high bypass unducted fan.
Actually. it is a very-high bypass unducted GEARED, VARIABLE PITCH fan.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th February 2009 | 03:20
  #15 (permalink)  
Psychophysiological entity
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 169
From: Walton on the Naze Essex.
We used to describe it in very technical terms on the Dart: The squirt coming out the back was worth about 17% of the whoomph.
Loose rivets is online now  
Reply
Old 11th February 2009 | 15:01
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
After a couple of thousand hours operating Darts Loose rivets, the word whoomph seems incongruous. The word "Stagger" comes to mind as being more appropriate.

A few Dart statistics - 90% of the energy produced was for making noise, 1.7% for jet thrust, and the remaining 8.3% used fto stagger the propellors.

I kid thee not!

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply
Old 11th February 2009 | 16:37
  #17 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,332
Likes: 486
From: England
Got to bite on that one. 6,000 hours F27. The Dart was a bloody good engine. Would take anything you threw at it. Ice? With that impeller at the front you could chuck ice cubes at it and it would just go on working. I believe the bird-strike trials involved frozen chickens. One engine RR got right from the beginning.
Herod is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.