Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

APU Fuel Consumption

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

APU Fuel Consumption

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Dec 2008, 11:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 61
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
APU Fuel Consumption

Hi everybody

Just a short question about the fuel consumption of the APU. How many fuel does the APU of the following aircraft need per hour on ground?

A340-300
A340-600
B747
B737-300/400/500

Thanks and a happy new Year
jettrail is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2008, 13:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For the A340, look in FCOM 2.05.10, Flt Planing General. Cheers, Happy New Year.
modeselectorignition is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2008, 14:11
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roughly 200ph on the B767.
Spooky 2 is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2008, 14:43
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For the 737 300 and 500 we used around 80kg per hour depending on APU type and bleed air usage. -700 is around 80 to 120kg per hour
Denti is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2008, 15:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Roughly 80 kgs an hour of the AVRO's
DutchBird-757 is offline  
Old 28th Dec 2008, 22:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AEP
Age: 80
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747 Classic APU fuel consumption

The consumption of APU (Garrett GTPC-660-4) depends on the power generated (required).
APU used only for electrical (1 or 2 generators) generally will be using 400-450 kg/hour.
If APU is used for electrical generator(s) + 1 air conditioning pack, count on about 550-600 kg/hour.
Starting 4 engines using APU for pack bleed air is 100 kilos total for start.
Based on above, used to suggest to fuel 500 kg extra in nº 2 main tank which is the APU fuel source.
That is over the dispatch fuel required, plus my "personal little extra"...
xxx
For the 737, cannot recall, but should be same as a 727 APU (same type).
Count on 250-300 kg/hour for the 727-737... and 50 kg for start of engines.
xxx
Remember, your airline APU use is probably billed by the hours of use (Hobbs meter).
Is less expensive to use ground power units, electrical/air than APU.
Save the last drops for my Zippo cigarette lighter.
xxx

Happy contrails
BelArgUSA is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2008, 15:04
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
External conditioned air [ground aircon] in tropical or desert climates is inadequate. Pax, especially FC & BC pax who fork over thousands of dollars for a seat, are entitled to "comfort" [22c] in the cabin. Whether the APU will burn 500 or 800kg/hr to maintain regulated cabin temperature is of zero concern. The fuel saving paranoia has its limitations.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2008, 15:15
  #8 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Denti has it right for the 737 - 80 at idle and around 120 for air and electrics.
BOAC is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2008, 18:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: inside of a pretty bustard
Age: 53
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hi belargusa, how are you my old fart?......are you on a sunny beach , as an aviator with more than 20.000 flying hrs is doing in these days, or you are staying home, drinking a glass of jack daniels......

have a happy new year 2009, my dear!!!!!!!!!!!!!
airman13 is offline  
Old 29th Dec 2008, 18:57
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 61
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thx for your help modeselectorignition but unfortunately I don´t have access to the mentioned A340 documentation. I´m no pilot. I´m an employee of a ground supplier at a german airport. We´re planning to buy some external air conditioning units and I have to calculate the rental price.

I hope somebody can help out with more detailed info about APU fuel consumption of A343, A342 or A346.

Thanks a lot to all the others which helped me with input

Bye and happy new year
jettrail is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2018, 06:59
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, do you know the B738 consumption for electrical only?

Thanks
run77 is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2018, 11:40
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts


Thought id gone through a time warp, perhaps 411A will reappear..


A ten year pause and then another post on this old topic


Is that a record ?
stilton is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2018, 12:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Stilton
A lot of oldies but goodies are making their return as of lately
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Old 9th Jul 2018, 13:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im monitoring fuel efficiency and doing APU on ground project.

A pilot friend of mine ran a test on B738 APU with generator only and generator + packs. The result, APU with only generator consumed 10kg fuel for 5 mins while APU with generator + packs consumed 10kg fuel for 4.5 mins.

is this acceptable?
​​
run77 is offline  
Old 10th Jul 2018, 23:45
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blighty (Nth. Downs)
Age: 77
Posts: 2,107
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Two questions come to mind:
(1) What do you mean by “acceptable”?
(2) How did your pilot friend determine when 10 kg of fuel had been consumed?

Also, I’m surprised that turning on the packs only increased fuel flow by 11%.
Chris Scott is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2018, 01:27
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris Scott
Two questions come to mind:
(1) What do you mean by “acceptable”?
(2) How did your pilot friend determine when 10 kg of fuel had been consumed?

Also, I’m surprised that turning on the packs only increased fuel flow by 11%.
Hi Chris,

1. Due to the experiment was only tested on 1 flight on the ground, that is why i need to know if it is logical and "acceptable".
2. During on the ground, the engines were off and the only source of power and aircond packs came from APU. Hence the 10 kg consumption was read from the FMC CDU and the timing of the 10 mins consumption recorded.

I'm also surprised the the difference is so little.

Regards
run77 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.