APU Fuel Consumption
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 61
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
APU Fuel Consumption
Hi everybody
Just a short question about the fuel consumption of the APU. How many fuel does the APU of the following aircraft need per hour on ground?
A340-300
A340-600
B747
B737-300/400/500
Thanks and a happy new Year
Just a short question about the fuel consumption of the APU. How many fuel does the APU of the following aircraft need per hour on ground?
A340-300
A340-600
B747
B737-300/400/500
Thanks and a happy new Year
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AEP
Age: 80
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
747 Classic APU fuel consumption
The consumption of APU (Garrett GTPC-660-4) depends on the power generated (required).
APU used only for electrical (1 or 2 generators) generally will be using 400-450 kg/hour.
If APU is used for electrical generator(s) + 1 air conditioning pack, count on about 550-600 kg/hour.
Starting 4 engines using APU for pack bleed air is 100 kilos total for start.
Based on above, used to suggest to fuel 500 kg extra in nº 2 main tank which is the APU fuel source.
That is over the dispatch fuel required, plus my "personal little extra"...
xxx
For the 737, cannot recall, but should be same as a 727 APU (same type).
Count on 250-300 kg/hour for the 727-737... and 50 kg for start of engines.
xxx
Remember, your airline APU use is probably billed by the hours of use (Hobbs meter).
Is less expensive to use ground power units, electrical/air than APU.
Save the last drops for my Zippo cigarette lighter.
xxx
Happy contrails
APU used only for electrical (1 or 2 generators) generally will be using 400-450 kg/hour.
If APU is used for electrical generator(s) + 1 air conditioning pack, count on about 550-600 kg/hour.
Starting 4 engines using APU for pack bleed air is 100 kilos total for start.
Based on above, used to suggest to fuel 500 kg extra in nº 2 main tank which is the APU fuel source.
That is over the dispatch fuel required, plus my "personal little extra"...
xxx
For the 737, cannot recall, but should be same as a 727 APU (same type).
Count on 250-300 kg/hour for the 727-737... and 50 kg for start of engines.
xxx
Remember, your airline APU use is probably billed by the hours of use (Hobbs meter).
Is less expensive to use ground power units, electrical/air than APU.
Save the last drops for my Zippo cigarette lighter.
xxx
Happy contrails
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
External conditioned air [ground aircon] in tropical or desert climates is inadequate. Pax, especially FC & BC pax who fork over thousands of dollars for a seat, are entitled to "comfort" [22c] in the cabin. Whether the APU will burn 500 or 800kg/hr to maintain regulated cabin temperature is of zero concern. The fuel saving paranoia has its limitations.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: inside of a pretty bustard
Age: 53
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hi belargusa, how are you my old fart?......are you on a sunny beach , as an aviator with more than 20.000 flying hrs is doing in these days, or you are staying home, drinking a glass of jack daniels......
have a happy new year 2009, my dear!!!!!!!!!!!!!
have a happy new year 2009, my dear!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 61
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thx for your help modeselectorignition but unfortunately I don´t have access to the mentioned A340 documentation. I´m no pilot. I´m an employee of a ground supplier at a german airport. We´re planning to buy some external air conditioning units and I have to calculate the rental price.
I hope somebody can help out with more detailed info about APU fuel consumption of A343, A342 or A346.
Thanks a lot to all the others which helped me with input
Bye and happy new year
I hope somebody can help out with more detailed info about APU fuel consumption of A343, A342 or A346.
Thanks a lot to all the others which helped me with input
Bye and happy new year
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Im monitoring fuel efficiency and doing APU on ground project.
A pilot friend of mine ran a test on B738 APU with generator only and generator + packs. The result, APU with only generator consumed 10kg fuel for 5 mins while APU with generator + packs consumed 10kg fuel for 4.5 mins.
is this acceptable?
A pilot friend of mine ran a test on B738 APU with generator only and generator + packs. The result, APU with only generator consumed 10kg fuel for 5 mins while APU with generator + packs consumed 10kg fuel for 4.5 mins.
is this acceptable?
Two questions come to mind:
(1) What do you mean by “acceptable”?
(2) How did your pilot friend determine when 10 kg of fuel had been consumed?
Also, I’m surprised that turning on the packs only increased fuel flow by 11%.
(1) What do you mean by “acceptable”?
(2) How did your pilot friend determine when 10 kg of fuel had been consumed?
Also, I’m surprised that turning on the packs only increased fuel flow by 11%.
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1. Due to the experiment was only tested on 1 flight on the ground, that is why i need to know if it is logical and "acceptable".
2. During on the ground, the engines were off and the only source of power and aircond packs came from APU. Hence the 10 kg consumption was read from the FMC CDU and the timing of the 10 mins consumption recorded.
I'm also surprised the the difference is so little.
Regards