Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Tu-154M fuel burn

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Tu-154M fuel burn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Dec 2008, 18:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Max Hamburgers
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tu-154M fuel burn

Hi!
Does anyone where I can find the fuel burn Tupolev Tu-154M?
Thanks,
//Tu154lover
Tu154lover is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2008, 18:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Yeah I'd like to know how many sacks of coal they burn as hour as well!
haughtney1 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2008, 18:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: US
Age: 45
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The average fuel burn of Tu-154M is 5.5 tons/hour.
konstantinpilot is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2008, 18:57
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ask OPS!
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ouch!

That's against the 320/321 burn of about 2-2.2 tonnes an hour!

Gotta love the Tupolev Ground Grippers!
wobble2plank is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2008, 07:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In a house
Age: 48
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, but its bloody quick, and looks far cooler than an airbus
electricdeathjet is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2008, 13:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So how fast are they?
I've heard stories ....
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2008, 13:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SEA
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The burn should be compared to B727 not to A310/320. Different generation. Tops B727, not by much, but is also bigger and faster. I heard stories of .92-.95. I don't how much truth in that. However B727 can reach .88
countbat is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2008, 13:49
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In a house
Age: 48
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quick search shows Max cruise speed 527KTS
Econ Speed 486KTS

Not bad for a late 60's east block 727 I guess....
That will give the 747 boys something to think about!
electricdeathjet is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2008, 17:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A cute feature of Tu-154 is 12 main wheels. B727 has just 4, and they are very heavily loaded (737 and 320 are lighter, while the bigger planes have 8 or more wheels).
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2008, 00:03
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gold Coast
Age: 58
Posts: 1,611
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quick search shows Max cruise speed 527KTS
Econ Speed 486KTS

Not bad for a late 60's east block 727 I guess....
That will give the 747 boys something to think about!
I've thought about it, and that's about the same speed as a 747.
18-Wheeler is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2008, 11:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Newcastle
Age: 40
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, but the Bulgarian ones I've seen whizzing around seem to do that kind of speed at 3000'!

Well, maybe a slight exageration, but they went past us doing 290kts at a good rate!
TCXCadet is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2008, 22:19
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: West
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Moscow-SVO Noise Abatement Procedures

I love walking on the ramp to customs and watching a TU-134/154 depart. It sounds like an F-4. Yet when we arrive, we have to brief that we are only permitted to use idle-reverse for noise considerations (unless safety dictates otherwise).
None is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2008, 14:03
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Max Hamburgers
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But if we compare to Tu-204 or Tu-214 (bigger), how much does they burns?
Tu154lover is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2008, 14:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I imagine that the RB211-powered 204 burns something similar to an RB211-powered 757.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2008, 17:19
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Max Hamburgers
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, I think it will be something like the 757. But the most intresting is the PS-90 version
Tu154lover is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2008, 20:17
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, according to Aviadvigatel's website, sound like PS-90 burns roughly 1800kg/hr at cruise or around 4000lb/hr.

Авиационный турбореактивный двигатель ПС-90А
flyboyike is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2008, 17:24
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Max Hamburgers
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is for per engine?
Tu154lover is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2008, 17:42
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In OY-VKH
Age: 31
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course these numbers are per engines!!!!
If they were not i guess Tupolev may have made a succes in airplane building
wich is quite surpricing
Robini is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2008, 19:20
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 154lover
...Per engine?
Yes, per engine, per hour.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2008, 14:34
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Deep in fog
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Used to fly Tupolev154
En cruise she goes at M0.82
MAX TU154M M0.85
TU154B 0.88(older version guzzling 6 tons/hour)
TU 204 with PS-90 engines roughly 3.5 t/h, but it's quite slow M.72-78
TU154M is a nice and very reliable aicraft. Onboad flight control computer (enhancing hydromechanical flight control ) is from some rocket.
But it's very easy to do a hard landing - without engine power it nicely goes down! Whet it's hot and high we used to add some RPM (up to climb power when it's heavy) during flare, and then set idle.
hedgehog-in-fog is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.