Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Airline's FO recency of experience

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Airline's FO recency of experience

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Dec 2008, 11:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airline's FO recency of experience

Would like to know how the airlines (US Part 121 specifically) allow FO's to undergo recurrent training every 12 months, while recency of Instrumet rating is based on a six month intervals (6 approaches, etc.)? Is there a different tracking system?

Thanks!
ranklein is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2008, 06:07
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: B.F.E.
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FAR 61.57 "Recent Flight Experience", which contains the instrument currency requirements in question, only applies to the pilot-in-command. There is no reference to SIC instrument currency. As long as his/her annual recurrent training is current the FO is considered instrument current for the purposes of 121 operations, unless the individual operator has it's own currency requirements that are more stringent than the FARs.

Additionally, for pilots flying for operators who train under an Advanced Qualification Program, even the PIC only has to receive recurrent training once a year via a single 3-day simulator program under an exception to 61.57.

It is therefore possible to be current to fly instrument approaches in a 747 at night in storms as an airline FO under part 121 (or even Captain using AQP) while simultaneously being unable to fly as PIC carrying passengers under an IFR flight plan in a Cessna 172 on a VFR day under part 91.

Last edited by hikoushi; 5th Dec 2008 at 06:22.
hikoushi is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2008, 16:08
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks mate,

Now I see how it might work.
Indeed interesting..

ranklein is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2008, 17:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Obviously rules written by two different lawyers
barit1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.