B777 Cabin Temp increase with packs off
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B777 Cabin Temp increase with packs off
We are starting to use PACKS OFF for takeoff due to a requirement for increased takeoff weight. Based on the procedure that PACKS will go OFF just before takeoff and be turned back on couple minutes later. Does anyone have any idea of the expected rise in cabin temperature, especially from hot airports.
Mutt
Mutt
Join Date: Jun 1996
Location: Check with Ops
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Mutt,
If it's anything like the 744 then it'll be insignificant. Maybe 1 deg down the back and probably stay the same at the front. That's with packs off just before take-off and start to put them on again once CLB thrust is annunciated at 1000'.
If it's anything like the 744 then it'll be insignificant. Maybe 1 deg down the back and probably stay the same at the front. That's with packs off just before take-off and start to put them on again once CLB thrust is annunciated at 1000'.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As said by the others Mutt, it's no big deal. Temperature rise even in Middle East type temperatures is hardly noticeable, the only thing that gets occasional passenger comment is the reduction in air flow, but the Recirc Fans help to relieve this.
The one factor guaranteed to cause some discomfort is if the over-enthusiastic PNF closes both Packs at once after Takeoff, giving a pressure bump. One at a time is barely noticeable.
Regards,
Old Smokey
The one factor guaranteed to cause some discomfort is if the over-enthusiastic PNF closes both Packs at once after Takeoff, giving a pressure bump. One at a time is barely noticeable.
Regards,
Old Smokey
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the responses..... OS, just to cheer you up, this procedure will be introduced with improved climb, so no more balanced field, albeit only at one airport where a 14,000 kgs takeoff weight improvement is the result.
Cheers
Mutt
Cheers
Mutt
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Mutt, at last you've gone unbalanced!!! I'm going to buy a lottery ticket, I have visions of my unbalanced friend, J_T smirking!
I've seen some very good weight increases with B777 Increased Speeds, but none of the magnitude of 14,000 Kg come to mind. If it doesn't compromise your anonymity, which Airport and Runway is that?
On the topic of Packs Off Takeoff, do you use the APU to Packs option on the -300ER? Nice, but for minimal discomfort Vs Packs Off (which gives the same performance result), always thought it a lot of extra expense for a small gain.
Regards,
Old Smokey
I've seen some very good weight increases with B777 Increased Speeds, but none of the magnitude of 14,000 Kg come to mind. If it doesn't compromise your anonymity, which Airport and Runway is that?
On the topic of Packs Off Takeoff, do you use the APU to Packs option on the -300ER? Nice, but for minimal discomfort Vs Packs Off (which gives the same performance result), always thought it a lot of extra expense for a small gain.
Regards,
Old Smokey
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Above and Beyond
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Temp rise after packs off
Nobody can say a precise time . Depends on humidity outside temperature ,elevation,because an aircraft is not that well sealed.
A lot a factors. But whatever,it´s only a few minutes.
It´s a good question for the QR Command Interview,LOL.
A lot a factors. But whatever,it´s only a few minutes.
It´s a good question for the QR Command Interview,LOL.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: USofA
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doors
I read a report recently regarding a BA767-300 doing a packs off takeoff down in Entebbe. They briefed the FA's that the doors might rattle a little do to the lack of a positive pressure on the seals. None the less they did get a door warning light on the T.O. roll and rejected the takeoff with a resultant deflation of the tires. Very interesting as frankly I would not have thought of that possibility and I have done numerous packs off takeoffs in both the 767/777 and the MD11. You learn something new in this business everyday!
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canadia
Age: 94
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am not quite driving those types of a/c yet but just for my understanding of PACKS...is this some sort of heat exchanger that regulates air temperature from the engine bleed air?
just wanting to learn
Cheers folks
just wanting to learn
Cheers folks
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sussex, UK
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"They briefed the FA's that the doors might rattle a little do to the lack of a positive pressure on the seals"
Now there's a thought: from the dark recesses of my aircarft design lectures, I have a recollection that pressurisation the fuselage during the takeoff run is one of the assumptions for the fatigue spectrum generation for the fueslage structure design. Something to do with the effect of the pressurisation reducing the compression loads in the lower half.
If we're all going to start delaying the pressurisation sequence until you're in flight, it might be an interesting project to see if there are any implications. I suspect not, but I wonder if anyone's done the maths?
Now there's a thought: from the dark recesses of my aircarft design lectures, I have a recollection that pressurisation the fuselage during the takeoff run is one of the assumptions for the fatigue spectrum generation for the fueslage structure design. Something to do with the effect of the pressurisation reducing the compression loads in the lower half.
If we're all going to start delaying the pressurisation sequence until you're in flight, it might be an interesting project to see if there are any implications. I suspect not, but I wonder if anyone's done the maths?
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A packs off take off is quite noticable down the back, it sounds and feels quite different from the norm.
It's always a good idea to tell the cabin crew if you're going to do one, just so that they don't phone you during the take off because they think something is wrong.
It's always a good idea to tell the cabin crew if you're going to do one, just so that they don't phone you during the take off because they think something is wrong.
Only problem is it wrecks ACM's . Think about it, packs on ground for a couple of hours, all machinery nice and hot . switch off for 5 mins , ACM fills with water , major corrosion issue and very high failure rate. Note we were doing it every time due company procedures until Boeing pointed out that nobody else was getting the failures . But to put it into context if you're only doing occasionally for perf reasons shouldnt be an issue .
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: in a ditch
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
where a 14,000 kgs takeoff weight improvement is the result.
I ran a few numbers and the best improvement on the 744 was around 4,000 kgs. All numbers on the 777-300ER were within 1-2000 kgs.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I certainly doubt this figure. I think you probably meant 1,400 kgs.
1: Aircraft / Engine configuration
2: Airport
3: Temperature
4: PEP version
5: Previous operational procedures
So please be very careful about about sweeping statements about doubting figures!
Mutt
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FAA Approved Airplane Flight Manual
BOEING AFM-DPI Performance Software
Critical Takeoff Limit Weight Report
Case 1
Air Cond Bleed = On
V1 Selection = Balanced
Improved Climb = None
Takeoff Limit Weight
CRITICAL: Climb Limit 270043 KG
Case 2
Air Cond Bleed = Off
V1 Selection = Optimum
Improved Climb = Optimum
Takeoff Limit Weights
CRITICAL: Brake Energy Limit 284454 KG
CRITICAL: Climb Limit 284454 KG
284454 - 270043 =14,411 kgs
Sorry, but you gotta trust the AFM
Mutt
BOEING AFM-DPI Performance Software
Critical Takeoff Limit Weight Report
Case 1
Air Cond Bleed = On
V1 Selection = Balanced
Improved Climb = None
Takeoff Limit Weight
CRITICAL: Climb Limit 270043 KG
Case 2
Air Cond Bleed = Off
V1 Selection = Optimum
Improved Climb = Optimum
Takeoff Limit Weights
CRITICAL: Brake Energy Limit 284454 KG
CRITICAL: Climb Limit 284454 KG
284454 - 270043 =14,411 kgs
Sorry, but you gotta trust the AFM
Mutt
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: in a ditch
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK. Seems I am missing something here. Here are some figures from our operational database. B777-300ER.
40C.QNH 990. NIL WIND. DRY. RTOW:-
PACKS ON PACKS OFF
LHR 27L 329.0 331.7
JNB 03L 267.8 270.9
DXB 12R 336.5 340.2
HKG 25R 333.3 336.7
AMS 36C 316.3 319.0
Where are we going wrong?
Put me out of my misery.
40C.QNH 990. NIL WIND. DRY. RTOW:-
PACKS ON PACKS OFF
LHR 27L 329.0 331.7
JNB 03L 267.8 270.9
DXB 12R 336.5 340.2
HKG 25R 333.3 336.7
AMS 36C 316.3 319.0
Where are we going wrong?
Put me out of my misery.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: ME
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B777-200
Your data doesnt include Improved Climb.
Mutt
Your data doesnt include Improved Climb.
OS, just to cheer you up, this procedure will be introduced with improved climb, so no more balanced field, albeit only at one airport where a 14,000 kgs takeoff weight improvement is the result
