Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

ATR fuel burn?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

ATR fuel burn?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th November 2008 | 15:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 1
From: Max Hamburgers
ATR fuel burn?

Hi!
Does anyone know where I can find informations about the fuel burn of ATR 42-500 and ATR 72-500?
I even wonder about other planes.
Thanks,
//Daniel
Tu154lover is offline  
Reply
Old 25th November 2008 | 19:10
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 1
From: Max Hamburgers
Canīt someone help me with this?
Tu154lover is offline  
Reply
Old 25th November 2008 | 19:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: ישראל
I think the 72 is about somewhere between 270-300 kgs/hr/eng
No_Speed_Restriction is offline  
Reply
Old 25th November 2008 | 20:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Just south of 50N
ATR Regional Aircraft - ATR

enjoy,

q
quazz is offline  
Reply
Old 26th November 2008 | 09:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: Behind You.....
The ATR 72-500's on our fleet, burns about 320 kg/hr/eng at FL160.

Hope it helps.
powerstall is offline  
Reply
Old 26th November 2008 | 12:30
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 1
From: Max Hamburgers
Thanks alot for your help! What is the fuel burn for the ATR 42-500? Thanks for the informations about the ATR 42-200 as well
Tu154lover is offline  
Reply
Old 28th November 2008 | 14:06
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 66
Likes: 1
From: Max Hamburgers
Or does the ATR 42-500 burns the same as the ATR 72-500?
Tu154lover is offline  
Reply
Old 28th November 2008 | 20:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Just south of 50N
I think the 42-500 and 72-500 have the same PW127 engines so they should have the same kg/hr consumption rate. But you would get to where you are going faster in the 42-500

Last edited by quazz; 28th November 2008 at 20:45.
quazz is offline  
Reply
Old 9th December 2008 | 23:14
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: western europe
a round figure
ATR42/72-500: 700kg first hour, 600kg per next hour
ATR 42-300/320: 600kg first hour, 500kg per next hour
Airforce1 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.