Noise Abatement Procedures JFK
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Djakarta
Age: 36
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Noise Abatement Procedures JFK
Unlike European Airpots where the required Noise Abatement Procedures are stated on the Jepp plates there appears to be nothing laid down for JFK or any other New York airports.
Could anybody in the know point me to the relevant documentation regarding the above.
Thanks.
Could anybody in the know point me to the relevant documentation regarding the above.
Thanks.
We officially call them "close in" and "distant" instead of 1 and 2. Anything official would be in the FAA Airport and Facilities Directory publication. The only thing I see for JFK is a number to call for more information. About the only time I'll do a close in in the States is to meet a climb gradient requirement.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the elimination of (heavy) Stage 1/2 aircraft from the skies, abatement procedures are not what they used to be but still exist.
While JFK has no CDA mandate (FAA's NextGen will) the airport is still monitored for noise at the end of each runway with a modest fine imposed on violators. Procedure turns on runways 4R/L are for noise abatement.
The FAA has mandated all commercial and private aircraft, regardless of weight, meet Stage 3 requirements by Dec 31, 2015 or be grounded.
While JFK has no CDA mandate (FAA's NextGen will) the airport is still monitored for noise at the end of each runway with a modest fine imposed on violators. Procedure turns on runways 4R/L are for noise abatement.
The FAA has mandated all commercial and private aircraft, regardless of weight, meet Stage 3 requirements by Dec 31, 2015 or be grounded.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NADP2 is the standard, unless otherwise stated in a Jepp 10-4 page. From our FOM:
Dunno why some claim "the term NADP1 etc are not recognised in the US"... Also dunno why a singular subject (term) is given a plural verb (are). Seems that's common in the UK...
Noise Abatement
Noise abatement departure profile 2 (NADP-2) is the normal profile used unless otherwise specified by the Jeppesen terminal charts or Air Traffic Control pages.
Noise abatement departure profile 2 (NADP-2) is the normal profile used unless otherwise specified by the Jeppesen terminal charts or Air Traffic Control pages.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
will be an 800'/ 800' tomorrow then. This is what you call a distant right?
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi Intruder...thanks for that. You are correct of course about is/are......I was going to write "the terms NADP1 and NADP2 are not...." Thought I would save myself some letters and put "etc" ...which refers to there being more than one 😀
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
31L turns over the water.
I had a discussion with the JFK tower senior controller and a FAA inspector. Now this conversation took place about 2004. On 31L departures the airport would like a turn to the south as safety and altitude permit. This puts the noise pattern over the bay and not along the close in residential shore line. The departure pages used to have a request along those lines. Back in the good old days we would start a very gentle roll to the left at fifty to one hundred feet. Maybe fifteen to twenty degrees of bank to a southerly heading.
Last edited by mustangsally; 4th Aug 2015 at 22:14. Reason: spelling