Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Why are logo lights included in the (M)MEL?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Why are logo lights included in the (M)MEL?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Oct 2008, 14:57
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know you pilots & engineers get annoyed with SLF

From an uninformed passengers perspective, I can imagine there are circumstances where the logo lights i.e interception at night in sensitive airspace where these logo illumination lamps would be of vital importance in helping verify that the aircraft was in fact an airliner. Sorry if it annoys the professionals Mods. But a few SLF do know what a MEL list is.

Please delete this mesage if its not relevent

Thanks

CAT III

Last edited by Guest 112233; 24th Oct 2008 at 15:00. Reason: helping verify
Guest 112233 is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 15:32
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Scotland
Age: 74
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Logo lights, when installed, are part of the Aircraft system. As such there are Airworthiness considerations, as in any lighting system, when they go wrong. The ANO dictates the lighting ‘must haves’ and the MEL time periods reflect the importance of the systems. Logo lights with a 120 day period are, obviously, not very important in the grand scheme of thing but are still Airworthiness items whether or not they are mentioned in the ANO.
It is my understanding that the MMEL is produced by the Manufacturer. From this the Operators can produce their own MEL that must be as, or more, restrictive than the MMEL. This MEL must pass scrutiny by the Operators NAA so that regional differences are incorporated.

p.s. Big Bad D. If you have the opportunity, can you do some modifications on the A320 series logo lights? Increasing the length of the connecting wires would be a good start. Playing ‘dropsy’ with the attaching screws to the SBU falling into the cavity below is no fun on cold and windy nights and more than doubles the time of the job as you have to remove the lower surface panel to remove these screws!

Last edited by morton; 24th Oct 2008 at 15:44. Reason: Noticed Big Bad D was a designer
morton is offline  
Old 24th Oct 2008, 15:45
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FlightDetent quotes the MMEL preamble - the MEL SHOULD cite only those items which have some effect on airworthiness. If there is a pencil sharpener on board, must it be in the MEL?

But are logo lights required by airworthiness regulations? I think not - althought they are a convenience in airfield ops.
barit1 is offline  
Old 25th Oct 2008, 09:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: oop north
Age: 54
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe the view was taken that as the logo lights are part of the external lighting system if there not working it may be reasons more serious than a u/s filament, and those reasons need to be investigated sooner rather than later
smudgethecat is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2008, 22:05
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Cat111 NDB---

From: John_tullamarine
(b) this means ALL the design standards, many of which are not known to the typical flyer, have to be included in (M)MEL assessments
so yeah -- maybe
Pugilistic Animus is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.