Improved fuel economy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: England
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Improved fuel economy
I flew with an experienced colleague who insisted on putting on the wing anti ice after acceleration alt 1500' (737). His theory being that the increased warmth on the leading edge transgresses over the wing chord to improve the laminar flow......any thoughts? Or just Bo****ks?
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure Boeing wouldn't like it! Whats wrong with following the flight manual? Its primarily used as a De-Icer only.
Has your colleague considered the decrease in engine efficiency (and increased fuel usage) due to the higher use of bleed air?
Has your colleague considered the decrease in engine efficiency (and increased fuel usage) due to the higher use of bleed air?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I flew with an experienced colleague who insisted on putting on the wing anti ice after acceleration alt 1500' (737). His theory being that the increased warmth on the leading edge transgresses over the wing chord to improve the laminar flow......any thoughts? Or just Bo****ks?
As Comfy said... follow what is written. Don't try to reinvent aerodynamics.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even aircraft DESIGNED for blowing on the wing for lift purposes didn't gain anything in cruise from having it on.
And what does he think all the escaping duct air is doing to the laminar flow when it mixes with the BL?
And what does he think all the escaping duct air is doing to the laminar flow when it mixes with the BL?
H