Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320 Single engine ops

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320 Single engine ops

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Sep 2008, 13:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 Single engine ops

The taxi at small airfields like EGNM is far too short to bother with all the single engine taxi procedures, surely? And cos you're not allowed to cross the runway without the second engine started, there's no advantage in bothering, is there?

This goes to all A320 pilots running out of small airfields - surely the taxi time is so small that there's no point in faffing with all the procedures that go with single engine taxi? I can see the point at somewhere like EHAM or EGLL, but not somewhere like EGNM or EGAC?

1234
CJ1234 is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 13:27
  #2 (permalink)  
PPRuNe supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Taxi time under 15 minutes, why bother.
Dream Land is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 18:25
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: KDEN
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
15 minutes!? Are you kidding me? That's nearly 180 lbs, 27 gal, an easy $100 out the tail pipe for no particular reason. Our lot will SE taxi an A320 if it saves 2 minutes. It takes about 1/16th of a First Officer's brain capacity to throw the necessary switches. The cross-pond culture gap boggles my mind sometimes.
Cardinal is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 19:26
  #4 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How does this affect a non-pilot? You don't seem to be asking, you are almost telling pilots there. What's the score and how are you affected (out of interest)? Taxi times are not all that short there. Any saving is a saving. What is the skin off your nose?
Rainboe is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2008, 19:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7 seconds...

.. The time it takes me to run the single engine taxi check list. I must be a saddo - I timed it!

Generally, taxi-ing speed is not affected and brake wear reduced. Saves 3-4 kg per minute, and thats on the diddy Embraer 145 I fly !
FlyingApe is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2008, 10:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: india
Age: 43
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi guys,

well to be very honest we're trying to save even 1 kg of fuel, whether it means single engine taxi, CONF 3 landings (a320 family), keeping her in thrust idle from top of descent to glide intercept, packs off take off's, high speed climb, REV idle at touchdown. However i just wanted to point out that there's a trade off everywhere, eg. reverse idle at touch down, you heat up the brakes tremendously, single eng taxi would create large imbalances between left and right tank. Furthermore with a heavier aircraft on the day you would have to use more power on the live engine during turns, resulting in the same consumption. So the question is is it effective ?
FlightDirector7 is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2008, 10:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on the 737 you don't have to do anything special,just close the start lever.It takes about 1 sec....fuel usage around 5-6 kg /min.
For 2 min- 10-12 kg save. For one flight 20-24 kg savings. If I do 15 flights /month result 300-360kg. For 10months (as we have 2 months vacation ) result 3000-3600kg.
And if we are,let's say 50 cpt's then on one year is about 150T to 180T.
What do you think now about the 2 min single engine taxi?

For climb,would it be more economical to fly max rate?
alexban is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2008, 05:19
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Citizen of the World
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight Director 7
All good fuel saving techniques. Every kg saved is worthwhile. Don't worry about your hotter than normal brakes. If you have fans leave them off until pushback on the next sector and they'll cool fine by themselves with the brakes off. Not so fast with brakes on. You just need them to be below 300 deg C for the next takeoff.
SIDSTAR is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2008, 16:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Somewhere between Europe and Africa
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CFM doesn't recomend single engine taxi out. They give several reasons:
Starting an engine without outside supervision (leaks, fire,etc); warm-up time (Airbus tells 2 minutes but CFM says optimum is 10-15 mins) that reduces engine life or could result in engine failure. So adding all up, it's not worth it.

So, I won't do single engine taxi out, however I'll do it when I taxiing in.

Check Six Krueger...

Last edited by Krueger; 21st Sep 2008 at 16:56.
Krueger is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2008, 16:50
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mumbai India
Age: 41
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fly the 20s and i think the only problem comes in when u come to a complete stop or uphill or badly paved tarmac... sometimes the thrust req to overcome this is much more than what is normal...
key ways to overcome is enter the turn with a little more speed than normal...
other than that... anytime the taxi time is more than 3 min... i'd say use it... to each his own...
zeus_737 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2008, 19:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the tannhauser gate
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the single engine taxi procedure is only for arrival, not for departure and (at least in cfm engines) engine must run at idle power 3 minutes before being shut down.
DC9gti is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.