Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Fuel Dump system question, necessity

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Fuel Dump system question, necessity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Aug 2008, 10:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Dump system question, necessity

Hi guys

I would like to find out, why for some aircraft a fuel dump system is necessary. According to regulations, an aircraft must have a fuel dump system if it is unable to comply with certain climb requirements, or so, I do not know the exact definition.

But here is the question... The aircraft must be able to take-off safely with one engine inop at MTOW, then how is it possible that it cannot conduct a go-around at weight which is always less than MTOW without dumping fuel?

Maybe I do not understand it correctly, please explain it to me

Thanks much for help

QuEsT147
QuEsT147 is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2008, 12:32
  #2 (permalink)  
kijangnim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Greetings,
You have to take into consideration, that you have flaps (more drag) gear down (more drag)
It is not always that you are Approach/landing climb limited
 
Old 30th Aug 2008, 12:53
  #3 (permalink)  
Chief Tardis Technician
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western Australia S31.715 E115.737
Age: 71
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also to be taken in to consideration is the max landing weight. If the craft is overweight for landing, the undercarriage may collapse, puncture the wings and cause a massive / fire explosion, generaly believed to not good. Much better to dump the excess load and land safely(ish).
Avtrician is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2008, 13:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do not know the exact definition.
The requirement as of amdt 25-108 in 14 CFR 25 is:

§ 25.1001 Fuel jettisoning system.

(a) A fuel jettisoning system must be installed on each airplane unless it is shown that the airplane meets the climb requirements of §§25.119 and 25.121(d) at maximum takeoff weight, less the actual or computed weight of fuel necessary for a 15-minute flight comprised of a takeoff, go-around, and landing at the airport of departure with the airplane configuration, speed, power, and thrust the same as that used in meeting the applicable takeoff, approach, and landing climb performance requirements of this part.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2008, 14:14
  #5 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Last edited by Rainboe; 14th Sep 2008 at 18:44.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2008, 23:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: New York
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many 767s do not have a fuel dump system.
Roadtrip is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2008, 00:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many 767s do not have a fuel dump system.
767's come in different weights, lengths and fuel capacity. The lighter and shorter ones don't need fuel jettison.
NSEU is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2008, 02:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Posts: 624
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And the funny thing about the B767 fuel dump system, you can only dump from the centre wing tank and with full wing tanks and an average ZFW you'll still be well over max landng weight.

Regards,
BH.
Bullethead is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2008, 03:13
  #9 (permalink)  
kijangnim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Greetings,
Bullethead
Center tank have to be empty before wing fuel tanks are used, due to wing to body(bending moment).... In fact the first limitation on the 767 was not allowed 10 tonnes in center tank with less than full tank in the wings, was then improved to 700 kgs in the center tank
 
Old 31st Aug 2008, 05:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Posts: 624
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G'day kijangnim,

Yeah, I realise the CWT is used before the wing tanks, due to wing bending relief, my point was that even though some the B767s I fly have a fuel dump system with any sort of normal ZFW you still can't dump to below max landing weight.

E.g. ZFW 125.0T Max is 130.6T
Full wing tanks 36.0T
AUW 161.0T
Max Ldg Wt 145.1T

There is no fuel dump capability from the wing tanks.

Regards,
BH.

P.S. One of these days I'm going to leave all the typos uncorrected, it makes for much more interesting reading.
Bullethead is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2008, 10:45
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah Bullethead...

It's the same setup on the B737 fuel dump system.

Cheers...FD...
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2008, 11:00
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Riga
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forgive my stupidity here, but if dumping from CWT on the 76, is it then possible to interrupt the dump, feed wing to CWT and then re-commence dump?

I have no information or experience of the 767 whatsoever so I am trying to visulize (and learn), as my job could loosely involve some old 200s this side of Christmas.

RIX
Romeo India Xray is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2008, 11:43
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East side of OZ
Posts: 624
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can turn off the dump pumps and close the dump valves whenever you wish and also recommence if needs be.

There is no capability to transfer fuel from any tank to any other tank, you can feed either engine from any tank or dump from the CWT only.

I'd be surprised if a 200 series B767 had a fuel dump capability.

Regards,
BH
Bullethead is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2008, 16:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Riga
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bullethead

Many thanks for that. I wont be flying them (I will be relegated/promoted whichever way you look at it, to turboprop land by then), only working closely with people who will.

RIX
Romeo India Xray is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2008, 00:12
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We're able to land overweight, with a maximum descent rate prescribed, and a requirement for an overweight landing inspection. However, when we plan for a fuel dump, it's the aircraft performance that concerns us, to include landing speeds and distance, more than the weight.
SNS3Guppy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.