G load determination after touchdown
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Riga
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
G load determination after touchdown
Dear All,
does anybody know if it is possible (through MCDU) for the pilot to determine actual G acceleration at touchdown after landing? I know that according to Airbus information, if G Load is more than 1,4G it should show G load value on SD lower line (above clocks).
Thanks in advance.
does anybody know if it is possible (through MCDU) for the pilot to determine actual G acceleration at touchdown after landing? I know that according to Airbus information, if G Load is more than 1,4G it should show G load value on SD lower line (above clocks).
Thanks in advance.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Inverted
Age: 40
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A320 Family
MCDU Menu > AIDS > Parameter Call-up> Alpha Call-up
Then type VACC and insert it. It should give you the vertical acceleration in G's
Nice to do once, but it's better to monitor the basic flight parameters to check that the PF is doing fine instead of monitoring G's
Then type VACC and insert it. It should give you the vertical acceleration in G's
Nice to do once, but it's better to monitor the basic flight parameters to check that the PF is doing fine instead of monitoring G's
Moderator
Regardless of the smoke and mirrors, a main problem with data capture revolves around matching the sampling rate against the time history of the event .. if the sampling rate is too slow (which will be the usual case for touch down G) the captured data has to be normalised to give some insight into the "real" happenings ... either way, if the reported value is somewhere near a limit, then it should be interpreted with some caution.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Greetings,
JOHN is right the recording of the G landing can or cannot be the creal one, we had cases of hard landings (above 1.4 Gs) that were never shown on the system ,on the other hand firm landings were recorded hard
The nose wheel dropping hard on the runway is not recorded
JOHN is right the recording of the G landing can or cannot be the creal one, we had cases of hard landings (above 1.4 Gs) that were never shown on the system ,on the other hand firm landings were recorded hard
The nose wheel dropping hard on the runway is not recorded
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
does anybody know if it is possible (through MCDU) for the pilot to determine actual G acceleration at touchdown after landing?
Regardless of the smoke and mirrors, a main problem with data capture revolves around matching the sampling rate against the time history of the event .. if the sampling rate is too slow (which will be the usual case for touch down G) the captured data has to be normalised to give some insight into the "real" happenings
The nose wheel dropping hard on the runway is not recorded
With the variety of folks tracking FDM (aka the old FOQA), and better methods of data exchange (NTSB still sells the old tabular-data tables which will total in excess of $100 for about 30 seconds of data), and various products for analysis (FlightScape’s Insight), it seems that the investigative authorities could agree upon better methods for analysis of “ARC” [hard landing] mishaps.