Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

ETOPS - Mag vs True


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

ETOPS - Mag vs True

Old 15th August 2008 | 06:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, England
ETOPS - Mag vs True

Hi guys, doing the planning for ETOPS trips, how many of us take into account the TAF and METAR reports (esp for Canada) and put the winds given into Mag winds with the varient? I knows loads of peeps that say yep the winds (given in TAFS or...) are ok with the runway avail at the alt airport. Some times it can be 30 degrees or more dif. I do the True to Mag change but lots of guys don't... Your thoughts?
Tight Slot is offline  
Reply
Old 15th August 2008 | 10:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Europe
I do!

and everyone should! It makes little difference in europe, but in canda it actually might mean a different runway in use from that you`re expecting if not converting to mag degrees
TO MEMO is offline  
Reply
Old 15th August 2008 | 17:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Gone to my "Happy Place".
I do it all the time, regardless of the country. True, it's a more pronouced degree of difference in the polar regions.
Jimmy Do Little is offline  
Reply
Old 16th August 2008 | 08:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: heads down trying to figure out Chinese RVSM
I do all the time, especially when flying on a Polar route between JFK and HKG, I think about the runways of the ERAs (enroute airports) and which runway would I decide to use if I encountered an unexpected diversion.
Hellenic aviator is offline  
Reply
Old 17th August 2008 | 11:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 1
From: AEP
Arctic Routes and Airports

Been absent from these areas since "last century" (shall I say 1992)...
xxx
Last time - 1992 - was dealing with flights from Anchorage or Fairbanks, to Keflavik/Prestwick, and dealt with airports such as Frobisher (Iqaluit), Sonderstrom or Goosebay. We navigated with the "plain triple INS", which gave us either true or magnetic on the HSI at the flip of a switch. We even had some of us using "grid nav" if necessary.
xxx
I landed a couple of times in Frobisher and Sonderstrom, was not a problem. I even recall a Northern Canada VOR which was even oriented to TRUE NORTH rather than having radials in magnetic, so we thought about QTE/QUJ, rather than QDR/QDM - Old fart here, cannot recall which VOR that was... maybe still there, and might confuse some of you guys...
xxx
Enjoy the penguins and the seals
Happy contrails
BelArgUSA is offline  
Reply
Old 17th August 2008 | 15:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: UK/Asia/M.E./N.A.
Airbus: If airport reference is degrees true (northern operations), PERF APPR page reference is "TRUE WIND".


If airport reference is degrees magnetic (most typical operations)
Insert degrees true wind from TAF, METAR reports into DESCENT WIND page.

eg. 270/15/1 This converts automatically on DESCENT WIND page to 270/15/GRND and is displayed on PERF APPR page in degrees magnetic.
actu8 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th August 2008 | 12:15
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
From: ? ? ?
take into account the TAF and METAR reports (esp for Canada) and put the winds given into Mag winds with the varient?
We do, and it should be one of the basic rules in planning, ETOPS or not.
Henry VIII is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.