Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Mobile 'Phone Use On Aircraft

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Mobile 'Phone Use On Aircraft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th August 2008 | 10:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Essex
Mobile 'Phone Use On Aircraft

Airlines have different rules on the use of mobile 'phones on their aircraft but even the most liberal only allow their use, for example, whilst approaching the gate on the taxiway.
I see that Ryanair is about to introduce the option to use mobile 'phones in the air.
I have one question: If the use of mobile 'phones presents a potential hazard to the safety of the aircraft, how will Ryanair cabin crew distinguish between those who are legitimately using their system and the morons who are trying to get a signal on their own networks?
I can't imagine that Ryanair, and perhaps the regulatory authorities, haven't thought about this, but are there any experts out there who can answer this question?
Many thanks, in advance.
Seat62K is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 10:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: UK, In the middle at the bottom and sometimes in LHR!
Not sure if Boeing have tested the use of mobile phones in flight, I suspect they have and would be the best people to ask since they build and test them!

If the avionics were given some kind of shielding this might help?......not too sure though.

M.
mackey is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 10:52
  #3 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 636
Likes: 792
From: England
how will Ryanair cabin crew distinguish between those who are legitimately using their system and the morons who are trying to get a signal on their own networks?
They won't need to.
The local base station in the aircraft can be designed to block access to outside networks by mobile phones within its range (i.e. inside the aircraft).
As an additional benefit, it will be able to block outside access whilst withholding access to the on-board system. Thus all mobile phone use can be blocked during takeoff and landing phases.
Sallyann1234 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 11:01
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: cheshire
Unfortunately the biggest danger may well be by SLF using or rathing shouting into their phones and who will annoy others. I can see nothing but hassle on flights, all for a fast buck.

At least on a train you have an option to escape, but short of having a parachute available....
harbour cotter is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 11:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: uk
the morons who are trying to get a signal on their own networks?
Phones work up too about 8k depending on where you are, not that stupid a thing to try!
adverse-bump is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 11:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Gosport
Looking into this further, you will find that the systems installed on Emirates and Ryanair are no switched on until the aircraft is at altitude to avoid any risk of compromising the ground networks.

Even then, the installed systems control the phones on board so that their power output is set at a minimum.
Whatisthematrix is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 11:13
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 38
Likes: 62
From: The Smaller Antipode
Why can't the Security Gestapo confiscate the bl--dy things along with the nail scissors.

Do us all a favour.
ExSp33db1rd is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 15:12
  #8 (permalink)  
kijangnim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Greetings,

The problem comes from the amount of energy generated by mobile phones in a closed environement (Faraday cage), it is difficult to assess how many phones radiating power will interfere or even damage avionics.
However, a new technology is available with Airbus, it is measuring the output are restricting (inhibiting)any further mobiles to lock on the network.
 
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 21:39
  #9 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 964
Likes: 43
From: 30 West
Phones connect and handshake with the local cell at different levels of power. Initially, they connect at low power, if they do not receive a signal, they increase the power until they get a better signal.

This is why your mobile battery discharges faster in a poor signal area.

On board, the airborne system receives at the lowest power setting, hence no threat to the systems.

I call Maintrol, Ops, the Wife, the Lover etc etc while taxiiing in.

Providing it is safe to do so and in a hands free environment, while not endangering any deer dolphins or puppies
javelin is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 21:51
  #10 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: In a far better place
When flying cargo, I gave my F/E the phone to call the hotel whilst on 5 mile final for a crew pickup. Didn't want to miss the breakfast buffet. After all timing is everything.
captjns is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 23:29
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: SE England
So if the aircraft unit (which works on only one of the 4 bands) fails will handsets then increase power to try and find a network?
Desk Jockey is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2008 | 23:51
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane
This topic has been discussed numerous times on PPRuNe.

Not sure if Boeing have tested the use of mobile phones in flight
Yes, Boeing leased a B747 many years ago (from memory from KLM), and after days of trying to find interference they could NOT.

I have been on Aircraft numerous times where all 3 of us on the flightdeck were using our personal mobiles, via own our servers, and there was also one installed on the flightdeck by the Company, never had any problems.

I would NOT like to see them in general passenger use, because of the nuisance factor, but it is NOT a safety problem.
airsupport is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2008 | 02:44
  #13 (permalink)  
kijangnim
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Greetings,

As long as the output of the mobile phone is under control there is no safety issues, however the mess in the aircraft is going to be unmanageable on the passenger side.
 
Reply
Old 10th August 2008 | 06:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: UK
I am often able to find interference... normally arround the OM welcoming me to whatever country... and informing what rates apply....

You can sometimes hear on the VHF texts comming thru after landing...
plain-plane is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2008 | 07:18
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: France
Once played, the Safety card is hard to disregard

I have often questioned the Safety issue of using Mobiles in different environments. In Petrol Stations they are banned in case they start a fire. However even after it was categorically proven that you cannot start a petrol fire from the signal of even the most powerful mobile phone, they still stay banned "because of the fire risk"

Aircraft would have been the same i guess except that money overides safety concerns.

Why don't we just be honest, ban the bl**dy things because they are so annoying. Make the SLF stand on the wing if they want to make a call.

And why dont security ban them, after all more than one person has been assasinated with a mobile phone that went bang. Ahhhh money again....

Red Top
Red Top Comanche is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2008 | 07:29
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: southwest
Phones should be confiscated by security or put in checked baggage. That way they will only annoy the poor pet dogs in the hold.
Dysag is offline  
Reply
Old 10th August 2008 | 07:58
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 253
Likes: 1
From: "THAT" place??!!
Dogs? What about confusing the cats? Then there are those bloody Guinea Fowl! (Oh I miss Nigeria...)

Ray Darr is offline  
Reply
Old 17th August 2008 | 16:16
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Windsor CA 95492
Smile

Desk Jockey has a very valid point. If the local area network goes bad all the active sets will go to max output.Nobody has explained a solution to me. Isuppose you could have a back-up network that is instantly activated if prime one fails. That would be expensive, and given luck it might all go away!
keith smith is offline  
Reply
Old 18th August 2008 | 18:06
  #19 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 1998
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 847
From: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Every flight probably has a couple running, just because the owners have forgotten to switch them off (sometimes mine!). Any "event" like the Qantas depressurisation will be met with a blast of RF, as all of the passengers turn on their camera phones to record the event to sell to the networks/post on U-tube.
Checkboard is offline  
Reply
Old 20th August 2008 | 12:24
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: india
All said and done, there is an OEB (operating engineering bulletin) regarding this on A320 family aircraft. I remember reading it some time back, there are certain electronic devices allowed. However, if i remember correctly it clearly states that nothing can be used for take off and landing.

Cheers
FlightDirector7 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.