Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

reverse thrust at the gate

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

reverse thrust at the gate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 19:29
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: london
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
reverse thrust at the gate

Hello to all.
Ieve been an avid reader for some time but never found the answer to something I saw at Salt Lake on a stopover to Vegas. Instead of using a tug to push back I saw quite a few aircraft using reverse thrust to back away from the gate. Never seen this in the UK and was wondering what the carriers/manufacturers position is on using that procedure?
onthehill2 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 19:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SE England
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's called powerback or power back. You will find more by googling.
Desk Jockey is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 20:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe DC9's and the MD80 series were approved for powerback by the manufacturer. Even then, the airline would have to approve it. Don't know if anybody still does it though.
Check Airman is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 20:40
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: london
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder what the engine manufacturers state though. I cant think that going from cold to a high thrust level in a short space of time can do the engines a great deal of good
onthehill2 is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 21:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eastern Airlines was doing power backs, starting in the mid 80's. B-727's, DC-9's. Ramp had to be level or sloping away from the terminal. Power was really minimal. Power was added for a forward roll of a couple of inches then reverse thrust. Turns left or right were normal.
mustangsally is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 21:43
  #6 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've seen it done quite often on turbo props around Europe.

MXP springs to mind as one example.
 
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 23:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
so is a Boeing 757, but no-one does it
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Old 22nd Jul 2008, 23:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Minneapolis Mn USA
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We also used power backs on our DC9's and 727's only, and then only if the ramp was "not contaminated" - no rain or snow. Although in the winter, we'd sometimes have our 747's with the inboards in reverse and a "wee bit o' power" to help the tug over the icy bits of the ramp. I must admit to being one of those who voiced concerns about engine FOD when we adopted the power back procedure, but I can't recall ever losing an engine to a power back FOD incident or stall. As "mustangsally" pointed out, it didn't take a ton of power to get the beasties moving, so as long as the oil temps were in the green, or yellow and rising, there was no harm to the engine. All you had to remember was that to stop after the power back, it was forward thrust not brakes - not unless you want an embarrassing view of the sky and a "hats-on" interview with the the Chief Pilot.
BigJoeRice is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2008, 00:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I must admit to being one of those who voiced concerns about engine FOD when we adopted the power back procedure, but I can't recall ever losing an engine to a power back FOD incident or stall.
A 747 pilot was telling me that one of his colleagues tried this and max EGT'd 3 (I recall) engines. From that time, he was known as the "6 million dollar man"... for those of you who can remember the TV series

Rgds.
NSEU
NSEU is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2008, 00:50
  #10 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: various places .....
Posts: 7,192
Received 100 Likes on 67 Posts
6 million dollar man

.. now, that has the ring of folk legend ... max temp would require a very significant thrust level .. certainly not the level one would be game to use on the ramp ?
john_tullamarine is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2008, 01:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: B.F.E.
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe he didn't wait till the chocks were out?
hikoushi is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2008, 02:10
  #12 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From the Douglas Boeing 717 FCOM (Not for Operational Use)

Powerback
* The following limitations are applicable when the airplane is using reverse thrust for reverse taxi (power back):
– Thrust reversers on both engines must be operative.
– Ramp slope limit range is +1% to –2%.
– Application of brakes while backing is prohibited.
– Powerback is not authorized for winds higher than 25 knots, or when ice, snow, or slush is on the ramp or during periods of heavy rain.
And, executing the manoeuvre.

Copyright ©The Boeing Company.

PT.10.2 POWERBACK

General

The powerback maneuver can be an efficient means for the airplane to depart the gate and transition to the taxi phase. There are, however, several factors of safety and passenger comfort that must be considered before commencing the maneuver and during the maneuver itself. These considerations are as follows:
• Flight and ground crew must have completed an appropriate powerback procedures training program.
• Powerback can be performed only in approved ramp areas.
• Thrust reversers on both engines must be operative.
• Ramp must be clear of contamination.
• There must be no more than moderate precipitation.
• Use minimum reverse thrust required.
• Do not use brakes while the airplane is moving rearward.
• Both pilots should have their feet on the floor during the powerback maneuver.
• Verify all personnel and equipment are clear of engines fore and aft prior to initiating movement of thrust levers.

Executing the Maneuver

Check that the FLAP/SLAT handle is in the UP/RET position and that ground crewman (or coordinator) is in position to maintain visual contact with Captain. Having received ground control clearance for powerback, Captain signals readiness to begin powerback with a flash of nosewheel light. Coordinator responds with all clear signal and commences rolling motion with both wands to indicate start of powerback. Captain releases parking brakes and ensures both pilots’ feet are on the floor. Captain applies reverse thrust to reverse idle detent and checks both engines in reverse thrust condition.

NOTE: To facilitate backward movement in some instances of tire flat spots, chocks, or ramp conditions, a few feet of forward taxi may be appropriate prior to applying reverse thrust. Use normal brakes to stop forward roll.

Apply reverse thrust as required to initiate movement. Once motion has commenced, reduce EPR to maintain a safe speed. If the speed is too fast, move one reverse thrust lever to forward thrust idle. If airplane does not move initially with maximum reverse EPR, discontinue powerback operation. Coordinator advises the speed of reverse taxi by varying the speed of wand(s) rotation. To signal a turn, coordinator points downward with his right or left hand. Downward pointing hand indicates direction the tail should move and direction the Captain should turn the nose gear steering wheel. When reverse taxi is complete, coordinator will give the come ahead signal. Captain should then place reverse thrust levers full down and apply forward thrust as required and transition to normal taxi.

Emergency Stop

If an emergency stop is required, coordinator will discontinue the rolling motion of the wands and immediately signal forward taxi. Captain should respond immediately by placing reverse levers full down and applying forward thrust as required.
[END]
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2008, 03:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: orbital
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
B744 Limitations.

'Backing the airplane with use of reverse thrust is prohibited.'
Re-entry is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2008, 05:52
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Usually Oz
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face Overtemp/stalling 3 Engines in Reverse

In the QF case, it was Damascus and the engines stalled in reverse having overrun the taxiway exit and tried to do a 3-point turn in a B742 [where, BTW, you could use idle reverse to help the tug; usually in icy locations.]

After finding a tug and an appropriate borescope, they got on with the job.

And the Capt. is better known as "Calamity", which sums up the highlights of his career [he use to say he was the only supervisory pilot with a velcro star!!]

G'day
Feather #3 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2008, 06:46
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DC-9, MD-80, B717, powerback is ok by FCOM as per Claret's post.

It looks like this.....

YouTube - AirTran Boeing 717 Powerback From Gate

It is not always a good idea, however....

Air Florida 90 air crash

"At 3:23pm, Palm 90 was cleared to push from the gate. The tug tried to push the 737, but snow that had accumulated on the ground caused it's tires to spin. Wheaton then suggested that, contrary to policy, they would use the aircraft's reverse thrust to assist in the push. The reversers were engaged for about a minute and a half, but were only successful in throwing up slush and snow. Another tug was brought in with chains and the aircraft was successfully pushed back."
ITCZ is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2008, 13:02
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anybody know why it seems to be restricted to planes with rear-mounted engines? What's so bad about doing that with the engines under the wings? Is it simply because the engines are closer to the ground and the risk of ingesting FOD is greater?
Check Airman is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2008, 14:02
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, because of FOD.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2008, 22:01
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,666
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
I've seen plenty of jet powerbacks over the years in the USA, but never with the same types elsewhere.It seems to use a lot of thrust/noise/fuel for a limited distance backwards. Possibly with more expensive fuel in Europe it's just cheaper to have a tug.

Scot Airways always did it away from the Edinburgh terminal with their Dornier 328s headed for London City, marshalled backwards. Not known another turboprop operator to do it in the UK. I've always been on the jet on the route in recent times, do they still do it with the Dorniers ?
WHBM is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 00:32
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pangea
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Haven't seen it as much lately but American Airlines used a thrust-reverse taxi on its MD-80s often (even at its hub).

Procedure was to pull forward a couple of feet to reduce the soft spot on the tyre after sitting for some time. Thrust reversers were then applied to back up. Forward thrust was used to come to a stop (or forward motion so that brakes could be applied).
icarusone is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2008, 05:16
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sarver PA USA 40.711 N X 79.7749 W
Age: 69
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking

A retired avionics tech informed me that Unfortunately Still Allegheny Airlines put a stop to power backs in the eighties.One of the reasons cited...........those windows on the terminal buildings are expensive. <G>
RJ Kanary is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.