supplementary normal proc Airbus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
supplementary normal proc Airbus
how do you perform this ck list? (read and do - challenge and responce etc)
There are some different interpretations in my conpany instructor family
Do you have some airbus information about that
Thank's in advance
There are some different interpretations in my conpany instructor family
Do you have some airbus information about that
Thank's in advance
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also in my company first we read the procedure and then we performe the procedure, but someone says that I read and do the actions, and some other says I read and you do the actions. This is the difference......
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moscow
Age: 48
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We read them then read&do as well. But next duty distribuation is mandatary in our case after several events of pushing DISCH instead of DITCH before de/antiicing: CM2 reads, CM1 perfoms.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hi Borota, but in this case is not a read and do ck list. In a read and do ck list pnf read and do. There isn't a type of ck list where i read and you do. what do you think? thank's for your answer
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moscow
Age: 48
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi, Italy!
I think according to standart we should do smth in the cockpit only according to your current duty (PF and/or PNF) and respective area of responsibililty. And this is a strict rule both for normal/supplementary and abnormal/emergency ECAM/QRH procedures. And most of cockpit area ussually are under PNF responsibility. As PNF must read (because PF is not allowed) so he does most of actions - and it is comes to custom to have opinion like yours. But nevertheless on very rare occasions does PF perfom smth.
And our company does violate this rule due to above mentioned reason & only for suppl.pr.. It is company right to create own standarts.
Go ahead.
I think according to standart we should do smth in the cockpit only according to your current duty (PF and/or PNF) and respective area of responsibililty. And this is a strict rule both for normal/supplementary and abnormal/emergency ECAM/QRH procedures. And most of cockpit area ussually are under PNF responsibility. As PNF must read (because PF is not allowed) so he does most of actions - and it is comes to custom to have opinion like yours. But nevertheless on very rare occasions does PF perfom smth.
And our company does violate this rule due to above mentioned reason & only for suppl.pr.. It is company right to create own standarts.
Go ahead.