Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Concorde!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2008, 17:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: LONDON
Age: 43
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Concorde!

Everyone knows that concorde used to fly at twice the speed of sound,
so what i want to know is would you still be able to hear the engine noise from the aircraft?

I only asl because acording to the theory if you are going 2 x speed of sound that means you should leave the sound behind you?

AI101
AI101 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 18:01
  #2 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes but noise is coming from the vibration the sound causes through the airframe and therefore travels through the fuselage! Also, sound can travel up the cabin from back to front at the speed of sound even though it is moving at Mach 2!
Most of the noise is air noise from airflow, not engine noise anyway.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 18:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct. The only thing he cannot here is the acustically propagated sound behind him, e.g. the roaring afterburners.

That's the same with every supersonic aircraft.

From personal experience I can tell you that supersonic flight is normally very much calmer than subsonic.

Dani
Dani is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 18:38
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's the same with every supersonic aircraft.

From personal experience I can tell you that supersonic flight is normally very much calmer than subsonic.

Dani
The other commercial supersonic transport, Tu-144, is said to be rather loud inside cabin. So, just which kind of noise is it there - engine or aerodynamic noise?
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 18:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
loud is always relative - is it louder than another Tupolev? Is it louder when subsonic or when supersonic?

I cannot tell, since I've never been inside a TU-144, as I have never been inside a (flying) Concorde. I just explained the physics.

Dani
Dani is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 20:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: on a beach
Age: 68
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What would you expect from a russian airplane?
beachbumflyer is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 20:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Near Gatwick
Posts: 479
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not a lot!
Charley B is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 21:12
  #8 (permalink)  
airfoilmod
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Well

Inadvertent test-pilotage on a regular basis? Excitement?
 
Old 21st Jun 2008, 21:44
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@beachbumflyer and @Charley B-You should watch what you are saying, Russia's military is what drove the Cold War for so long.
xxgunnerxx is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 22:40
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey Hills
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cabin noise on Concorde seemed to me to be at a higher pitch than subsonic but not any more intrusive than say a 747. Well as far as I remember having usually been filled with Dom Perignon, Puligny Montrachet and Bran Cantenac etc!

The stability during turns at low level leaving JFK was so reassuring and the lack of serious turbulence on every flight but one made each trip a delight. Cabin air was fresh - untill the cigars lit up!

Last edited by aviate1138; 22nd Jun 2008 at 06:39. Reason: removing thread creep/typo
aviate1138 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 00:22
  #11 (permalink)  
LH2
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Abroad
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What would you expect from a russian airplane?
Durability and performance at 1/10th the price of the Western equivalent?
LH2 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 01:12
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LH2 - don't think the Ruskies can spell 'dyouabillitie' can they?

- but they sure can spell 'performance'!

Cheers...FD...
Flight Detent is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 17:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No roaring afterburners there. IIRC Conceorde could supercruise on dry-thrust.
JohnFTEng is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 18:08
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Concorde needed to light up the AB for TO and for accellerating into Supersonic. Then they where switched off.

You couldn't fly long with AB continously on...!
Dani is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 19:21
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oil Capital of Central Scotland
Age: 56
Posts: 485
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
xxgunnerxx - You should watch what you are saying, Russia's military is what drove the Cold War for so long
....... and I thought it was just mutual paranoia and suspicion
Donkey497 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2008, 22:14
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 411
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Was in a 767-300 on a westbound track on a nice sunny day. AF Concorde passed us high above. Amongst the standard noise of our own cockpit, there was a distinct thud from the sonic boom. Very mild, like a dull thud from a hand slap on the fuselage outside the cockpit. Pretty cool though.

Relative speed difference was like watching a contrail high above while sitting in a patio chair outside.
WhatsaLizad? is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2008, 08:32
  #17 (permalink)  
"The INTRODUCER"
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Posts: 437
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Concorde boom movie

Not quite the same thing, but pretty neat all the same.

Surprised at the suggestion that cabin noise was much the same as 747. One of my major recollections of my (one and only) Concorde ride was what I perceived as the relatively high vibration and noise levels. That and the rate of climb from the runway.
Algy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.