Missing winglet
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: location, location
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Missing winglet
Speaking as a curious air traffic controller….a 747-400 departed from Stansted today with one winglet missing (they were aware of it). I was wondering what difference this would make to the flying qualities?
- would there be any noticeable difference in the handling?
- would any of the speeds or procedures change?
I guess there would be some difference in fuel used, but enough to warrant extra being taken on for reserves?
Thanks.
- would there be any noticeable difference in the handling?
- would any of the speeds or procedures change?
I guess there would be some difference in fuel used, but enough to warrant extra being taken on for reserves?
Thanks.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: HK MTR
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but you can fly a 747-400 with one winglet missing but not both, why?
I have also heard that you can buy 747-400's without winglet? Is there a difference in the wing design or am I missing something?
I have also heard that you can buy 747-400's without winglet? Is there a difference in the wing design or am I missing something?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: I know EXACTLY where I am..
Age: 54
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
747-400 without winglet
The short-range 747-400 such as the ones used on japanese domestic routes have no winglets and are also constructed for more cycles.
OORW
OORW
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: AMS
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
747-400 missing one winglet
There is a penalty on performance of almost 10t for take off. And a fuel increase of 2,5%.
But no speed restrictions/differences with a missing winglet.
Mac74
But no speed restrictions/differences with a missing winglet.
Mac74
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Pacific
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You would think that if the winglet has some effect on drag, it would be noticeable to the pilot when flying with one removed, ie some evidence of yaw, instability on approach or takeoff etc. But apparently not, and one flight I saw with a missing winglet (London to Singapore) actually burned less than flight-planned fuel. And the MEL allows flight with only one?
Made me wonder if the winglet (at least on the 744) was worth the effort.
Made me wonder if the winglet (at least on the 744) was worth the effort.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: north
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Someone correct me if I'm wrong but you can fly a 747-400 with one winglet missing but not both, why?
didn't certify it for flying with two missing. Not because it can't,
but because the process is expensive and the chances of two winglets
missing at once is minor.
M
During flight testing the manufacturer tests the aircraft with every access door, fairing, etc, etc that they figure will be knocked off by accident or fall off due undetected wear and tear or as a result of not being closed or secured properly and puts all the data in the Configuration Deviation List (CDL) which is an appendix to the Flight Manual.
It is very expensive and time consuming to go back and redo a test for some bit that gets knocked off that nobody thought of first time round. It can be done whilst testing a variant of the same model and possibly the data can be read back to previous versions.
The Japanese -400SR's were certified without winglets and are a unique variant of the 747-400.
As someone wrote above Boeing no doubt figured you would only damage one winglet at a time
It is very expensive and time consuming to go back and redo a test for some bit that gets knocked off that nobody thought of first time round. It can be done whilst testing a variant of the same model and possibly the data can be read back to previous versions.
The Japanese -400SR's were certified without winglets and are a unique variant of the 747-400.
As someone wrote above Boeing no doubt figured you would only damage one winglet at a time