Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

A320 dual engine failure, windmilling restart...

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

A320 dual engine failure, windmilling restart...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Apr 2008, 09:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: blue blue sky
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A320 dual engine failure, windmilling restart...

hello!

I have some doubts concerning a certain (simulator) scenario and hope there's someone who can help me out

You're experiencing a dual engine failure around FL170, you're flying rather slow due to other failures (230kts)...After a mayday call and some hesitation you take qrh (time delay approx 2min) for the dual engine failure checklist-fuel remaining...One of the first actions is engine mode selector IGN...

What would then be the chances that your engines will relight by windmilling restart? Assuming you keep green dot speed to reach your airfield...
I considered it as very small due to low speed, low altitude (and a small time delay) which, according to me, would make that you're out of the windmilling restart envelope...

I know as long as N2 still is 15% a windmilling restart should be possible.... (for a CFM56 engine)

What do you think?

Thanks in advance
gekko is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2008, 11:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: I dont know anymore
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Errr...without going to the manuals, I believe the optimum relight speed is 280kts - not sure how you would get on at 230kts. The initial actions are taught as memory items where I work.

Once below FL200 APU bleed is available to assist engine start when at Green Dot.

I'm sure someone else will offer some better help!
JSF1 is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2008, 14:08
  #3 (permalink)  
PPRuNe supporter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Right engine, 30 seconds on, then off, Left engine, 30 seconds on, etc. NFP does the restart, FP points aircraft toward the nearest airport.
Dream Land is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2008, 14:21
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: blue blue sky
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hey!

ok thanks, but my question is actually...

Is it very likely that with that speed and altitude (let's say 230kts FL150) you're engines will relight windmilling?

Because my idea is that (if APU is already running) just put bleed on and start the engines with starter assist...

thanks
gekko is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2008, 15:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: No one's home...
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So really this is a question about the CFM-56 and not about the A320 family?

seems the big thing is to make sure you are in the relight envelope to enhance the chance of getting it humming again. This is something the Pinnacle crew NEVER did and unfortunately they paid the ultimate price for the error.
wileydog3 is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2008, 16:58
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
These simulator questions are subjective as hell. Mostly because the simulator programing is subjective to begin with.

Actual engine relight envelopes vary precisely by engine model and age while the simulator typically programs by-the-book. i.e. if you ain't in the envelope, it ain't gonna restart.

However, most engine failures don't result in the flame going out (EGT goes up) and as such it's up to the crew to shut down the engine, by turning off the fuel. There is some chance that with some engine failures the simple act of turning the fuel back on will recover the engine before it winds down below the inflight restart N2 and thus the engine will relight by itself and recover some power even at low aircraft speeds. Of course it's doubtful that the simulator has considered this, but then that's the subjective side of simulator programming/training.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2008, 07:24
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: blue blue sky
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok! thanks for your opinions!
gekko is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2008, 07:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the mist
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assuming the engine is winmilling slower than required or recommended for a restart your N1 and airflow into the engine will be low therefore I'd say you'd risk a hung or hot start scenario. I'm not sure if the clever fuel control unit on the Airbus would alter the fuel flow to control this in the same way as it would on the ground. Ask someone smarter than me!
TheGorrilla is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2008, 08:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Inflight Windmilling Start

Your question points to the double double engine failure being due to "finger trouble". That said, the lower altitude should enhance your chances of a re-light provided the airspeed can be held close to optimum. Sounds like another simulator exercise thought up by someone with time on their hands to dream up the most unlikely scenarios. Unless of course you have flown through a volcanic cloud or some weather event which caused the engines to flameout.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2008, 08:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sussex, UK
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Speaking in purely general terms about the sim, the FADEC will command the starter valve open if it decides it needs it. It's not something I've looked at in a while, but if memory serves it's normally based on corrected N2 and altitude (thus core airflow) - there may be an N1 / P3 term in there too, the head's a but fuzzy this morning - and will scheduel the fuel flow appropriately.

The engine model dynamics are checked by the QTG, and in more detail during the engine development, so in answer to lomopaseo's point about blipping the fuel lever and catching a quick relight, it is indeed possible.
aidey_f is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2008, 05:19
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gweriniaeth Cymru
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As an engineer I often enjoy the discussions here. The basic point for me though - wouldn't you try anything you can to relight the engines, rather than debate if it would in a sim session or not?

For what it's worth, not trying to stir the pot here. As I am unfortunate/fortunate enough to have witnessed an unplanned 2 engine out event in real life during an A330 annual certification flight, where I was the riding engineer. The sound of the RAT deploying for real at FL200, 100NM from home was a very pogniant thing.

Wishing you safe flying in real life,

N1 Vibes
N1 Vibes is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2008, 13:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
wouldn't you try anything you can to relight the engines

be careful of that word anything

If you are outside the real inflight restart envelope, you will no doubt only meet the two of the three "S" in Spin-Spark-Spray As many pilots have found out, failure to get these in the right order can lead to permanent damage to the engine turbines. Blipping the fuel lever has to be thought of and executed quickly, else you will get a hung start. I'm not of fan of expecting pilots to act quickly in emergency situations. Instead I prefer trained predictable responses for both the crew and the airplane.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2008, 15:29
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: with the porangi,s in Pohara
Age: 66
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lomapaseo quote....."I'm not of fan of expecting pilots to act quickly in emergency situations. Instead I prefer trained predictable responses for both the crew and the airplane"

spoken like a true sim-instructer and refreshing to hear.....the only real way to look at this situation.Have practised this actual scenario in the sim,and as you say,by using the QRH,and working as a crew,the outcome was favourable...ugly,but favourable

....its not everday, one has a dual engine failure,...but when you do,you might as well give yourself the best chance by doing it right.....

Last edited by pakeha-boy; 6th Apr 2008 at 15:57.
pakeha-boy is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.