Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

is B 777 having hard times nowadys?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

is B 777 having hard times nowadys?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Apr 2008, 22:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: still in bed
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is B 777 having hard times nowadys?

United Cancels 31 Flights for Inspections



Article Tools Sponsored By
By JOHN SULLIVAN
Published: April 2, 2008

United Airlines on Wednesday became the latest air carrier to experience disruptions because of maintenance inspections, as the airline announced that it had temporarily removed its fleet of Boeing 777 aircraft from service to allow for checks, resulting in cancellation of 31 flights.

The inspections, of part of the fire suppression system in the cargo hold, were ordered by the airline after United workers found that scheduled checks of the equipment had not been performed, said Megan McCarthy, a spokeswoman for United. She said 52 aircraft were taken out of service beginning at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday evening. Inspecting all of the aircraft is expected to take 24 to 36 hours, she said. By Wednesday morning, 14 inspections had been completed.

She said none of the inspections conducted by noon on Wednesday had turned up any problems with the fire suppression systems.

The announcement came just hours before the Federal Aviation Administration released preliminary results of an audit of airlines’ compliance with agency orders known as airworthiness directives. Robert A. Sturgell, the acting administrator of the F.A.A., said the agency had checked compliance with nearly 2,400 such orders and found a 99 percent compliance rate.

The audit was undertaken after it emerged that Southwest Airline had been flown older aircraft without conducting required inspections for cracks in the fuselage.

Mr. Sturgell said in a statement that the level of compliance found in the audit showed “that our overall program is working and delivering incredibly high levels of compliance and record levels of safety.” Still, he announced that the agency would make several improvements to oversight of the airlines designed, among other things, to make F.A.A. orders clearer and allow inspectors to raise concerns more quickly.

The F.A.A.’s oversight of the airline industry has recently come under criticism by members of Congress, among others. On Thursday morning, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is scheduled to hold hearings on the agency’s performance.

Les Dorr, an F.A.A. spokesman, said United’s decision to ground the aircraft for inspections was voluntary and not related to the ongoing F.A.A. audit.

Last week, Delta and American Airlines canceled hundreds of flights to allow workers to check wiring on some aircraft.

Ms. McCarthy, the spokeswoman for United, said she did not know how many customers were affected by her airline’s cancellations, but said a 777 aircraft can hold about 340 passengers depending on its configuration. She said United has assigned other aircraft to complete some of the flights; in other cases, passengers have been offered the chance to switch to other flights or other airlines.

She said the Boeing 777 is used in long-distance flights both domestically and internationally. United operates hubs in New York, Washington, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Denver, but she said the cancellations did not affect any one spot in particular.

Ms. McCarthy said the round of inspections were set off after a review of the airline’s maintenance records indicated that the inspections had not been performed. She said she did not know how long the aircraft had gone without undergoing the inspection.

The inspection involves checking the firing mechanism on one of five bottles that make up the fire suppression system in the cargo hold, Ms. McCarthy said. The system is normally tested as part of the pre-flight safety check, according to the airline.

United has a total fleet of 460 aircraft.
ZAGORFLY is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2008, 09:04
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Derby
Age: 42
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lack of correct inspections is hardly the fault of the airframe.
GEnxsux is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2008, 12:48
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: on the beach
Age: 68
Posts: 2,027
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lack of correct inspections is hardly the fault of the airframe.

Hear, hear. It's the fault of the airlines concerned, surely!
Evanelpus is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2008, 18:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Middle of Somewhere..
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a general point, if it's an AD then it's a design issue with the airframe or engine etc. Surely an ideal airframe / engine should enter and continue in service with no AD's against it.

BTW I accept that you need AMM inspections etc..

Cheers,

John
Papa2Charlie is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2008, 21:40
  #5 (permalink)  
airfoilmod
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Your Post

Zagorfly you claim it is UA policy to test the suppression system as part of a "PreFlight inspection." If that is all that is required, why is the bust related to an AD? Why cancel flights and dead head 55 aircraft? To re-issue PF placards? Why not send a meter to each crew/station and update the walk around that way? I'm curious. Can't tell (without quotation marks)if the content of the last two lines is McCarthy, Sullivan, or you.
 
Old 4th Apr 2008, 03:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely an ideal airframe / engine should enter and continue in service with no AD's against it.
Yes...

So, what airframe meets the "ideal" criterion?

That's what I thought...
Intruder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.