QNE - What is it?
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: I'm Not Telling
QNE - What is it?
I have two (reasonably reliable) different definitions of QNE and was wondering if anyone knows the definitive answer.
The first states that is is 1013.2 - the standard pressure setting, used above TA.
The second states that is is the height indicated with the standard pressure setting set - used for approaches when landing on very high airfields (La Paz type heights!) where the local QFE would be off the clock of most altimeters.
Anyone know which is correct - I am tempted to think that it actually the latter but that the former has crept into common use to supply a Q-Code to SPS.
Thanks in anticipation.
CJ
The first states that is is 1013.2 - the standard pressure setting, used above TA.
The second states that is is the height indicated with the standard pressure setting set - used for approaches when landing on very high airfields (La Paz type heights!) where the local QFE would be off the clock of most altimeters.
Anyone know which is correct - I am tempted to think that it actually the latter but that the former has crept into common use to supply a Q-Code to SPS.
Thanks in anticipation.
CJ
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Beady Eye
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 1
From: UK
Guest
Posts: n/a
I've always understood it to be as indicated in BOAC's link, i.e. What indication will my altimeter give on landing at ... (place) at ... hours, my sub-scale being set to 1013.2 millibars (29.92 inches)? or On landing at ... (place) at ... hours, with your sub-scale being set to 1013.2 millibars (29.92 inches), your altimeter will indicate ... (figures and units).
But as CJ suggests, I suspect too suspect that QNE has become commonly used to represent SPS - I have heard it used in that way a good number of times.
But as CJ suggests, I suspect too suspect that QNE has become commonly used to represent SPS - I have heard it used in that way a good number of times.

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 206
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane
As far as I have seen, no altimeter has a setting pointer painted in at standard - I cannot see why this should not be done - it would make setting & checking that little bit easier and reliable. It could be a little "dayglo" arrowhead.
Plenty of accidents traced in part to wrong altimeter settings, I think.
Plenty of accidents traced in part to wrong altimeter settings, I think.





