Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Fuel and Paint

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Fuel and Paint

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Feb 2008, 08:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
Age: 46
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel and Paint

Was looking at this pic

Its a cargo aircraft so no doubt flying full laden a lot of the time. Has the paint been stripped to save on weight and fuel costs? If so what typical saving per flight are likely to be achieved?
20Legend is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 08:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
American Airlines have never painted their aircraft since metal fuselages came along in the 1930s, apart from the A300 which requires a special coating. It does save weight, cost, and the downtime when repainting, there seems to be a bit of extra maintenance in return. A few others (as here) do the same. It seems to be sufficiently minor that it's down to the corporate identity whether to go for it or not.
WHBM is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 09:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: right here
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it takes (roughly) 100kg to paint a 737
and
roughly 10kg fuel to carry an extra 100kg weight on a 4 hour flight
or maybe 2,5kg each hour for the paint.
these numbers/calculation will not stand a proper scientific crosscheck, but i think they give some idea....
FCS Explorer is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 10:02
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
Age: 46
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This one is a BCF, so I presume CX stripped the paint from the previous user and just didn't bother painting fully
20Legend is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 10:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that the weight of solids remaining after application or the weight of paint with solvents and carrier?
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 10:58
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Solids remaining after. I understand all aircraft are accurately weighed both before and after a paint job...
perkin is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 11:06
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

This one is a BCF, so I presume CX stripped the paint from the previous user and just didn't bother painting fully
It is a CX pax converted a/c. Although not a lot is saved per flt in the short term a study was conducted and the savings over a 5 year period were quite significant. runs into $00,000's.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 13:12
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Standing at P37
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is that the weight of solids remaining after application or the weight of paint with solvents and carrier?
Aircraft (large Boeings anyway) are painted with polyurethane paint, in effect they are coated in plastic which on a 747 adds up to 'quite a bit' - a few hundred kilo's. Its a two part mixture and cures via chemical reaction between parts A and B. Not via the evaporation of solvents so only a minute amount of weight is 'lost' from the paint mixture during the curing process (Judging by the awful smell in the hangar during painting at least a little of the mix ends up in the atmosphere/lungs)

Spanner Turner is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2008, 15:53
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
Age: 46
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so maybe saves them a bit then, but more of a corp thing by the sounds of it
20Legend is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2008, 03:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN USA
Age: 67
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
American Airlines have never painted their aircraft since metal fuselages came along in the 1930s, apart from the A300 which requires a special coating. It does save weight, cost, and the downtime when repainting, there seems to be a bit of extra maintenance in return. A few others (as here) do the same. It seems to be sufficiently minor that it's down to the corporate identity whether to go for it or not.

AA uses a special polish that is made for them from a shop in Georgia. I had to cal this shop to find out what I could use to strip the polish off when I was the project manager on a couple DC-9's they sold. The shop would not tell me the chemical make up but did tell me what would cut the polish. So the man-hours spent keeping the aircraft polished does hurt on the return of investment of not carrying the extra weight.

Solids remaining after. I understand all aircraft are accurately weighed both before and after a paint job...

Not always...there are mathematical methods that can be utilized to determine the new weight. Depending on the paint scheme, the old paint thickness is measured...usually 4 to 8ml thick. Then the new paint thickness is measured and mathematically the weight is found and the difference is add to, or subtracted to the Basic Weight of the aircraft.

Regards,
Greg
PierceAviation is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.