Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Designers Unveil 4,000mph Passenger Jet

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Designers Unveil 4,000mph Passenger Jet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th February 2008 | 06:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: fife
Designers Unveil 4,000mph Passenger Jet

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/...304022,00.html
W4LLACE is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 06:39
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 3
From: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
It runs on a liquid hydrogen Scimitar engine being developed by Reaction Engines that is based on existing technology.
Wouldn't be a relative of the RB535 being developed years ago for HOTOL, would it?

Whatever happened to HOTOL, this'll go the same way.

Yawn.

TheOddOne
TheOddOne is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 07:05
  #3 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,684
Likes: 7,368
From: Peripatetic
Skylon - son of Hotol and both the brainchild of Alan Bond.
ORAC is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 12:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: LGW
Looks like the "real world" is starting to catch up with thunderbirds! I remember seeing one episode featuring a new airliner that looked a lot like that sketch.

Last edited by Bat Fastard; 5th February 2008 at 12:16. Reason: spelling
Bat Fastard is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 13:11
  #5 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Aviation Qualifications: AME
Posts: 4,183
Likes: 1,118
From: UK
Fireflash?

You mean this one?
TURIN is online now  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 13:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: .
An interesting design. Would be exciting if it was to be developed. I wonder how problems of aerodynamic overheating would be tacked though... fascinating.

No chance of that though, since Eco-Crusaders/Eco-Governments would no doubt torpedo the design. I can hear them choking on their sustainably-grown soya beans and lentils already.
Captain Smithy is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 13:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Estonia
143 metres

143 metres???

What are they doing with 143 metres? Even Beriev-Be-2500 finds 122 metres or so quite enough!

I can understand why Concorde likes to have a slender fuselage and long nosecone. The result is that Concorde is about 62 m long and has 25 seat rows at 4 abreast. She is considerably longer than E-190 (which has a similar passenger cabin) and matches the length of MD-11 (which accommodates 410 seats).

Now, L-2000 and Boeing 2707 target near 300 seats. L-2000 specifies 5 seats abreast, and is actually a couple of cm narrower than DC-9. 60 rows of 5 abreast would take up more space than the 172 seats of MD-80. L-2000 is supposed to be 85 m or so.

Various B-2705, Boeing HSCT, MD HSCT, Airbus AST and JAXA NEXST projects talk of 300 seats, too - and they think they need 90...104 metres. It would cause some problems with fuselage bending strength and tailstrike clearance, plus a nuisance at taxiways and gates...

But 143 metres? Where does it go? With 300 passengers?

If an airport can handle 150 m long planes, how many seats do you think should go on, say, an Airbus 380-1800 stretched to 141 m length?
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 13:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: .
Perhaps the SLF have lots of legroom?

I'd imagine you'd need plenty of room for fuel too, travelling that fast.
Captain Smithy is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 14:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: uk
Hold at Lambourne........!
BOBBLEHAT is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 18:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Netherlands
They forgot the windows?!
perkin is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 18:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Estonia
They forgot the windows?!
They omitted them. Which is understandable for a freighter, and passenger airplanes like An-74 or Lockheed Galaxy - but those still have cockpit windows. Even shuttles which fly 18 times the speed of light and above have windscreen.

Try to taxi a plane 143 m long with no cockpit windows... Also, what do you think will the pitch angle be on touchdown?
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 21:54
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: wales
no cockpit windows??
speed787 is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 21:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: UK
Material Science and Windows

Who's to say, they are there but you can't see them.

The pilots see out, but not the other way, may be quite useful for heating effects ...

Suppose the land of science fiction ...
go-si is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 22:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Sweden
Even shuttles which fly 18 times the speed of light and above have windscreen
18 times speed of LIGHT !? I must have been sleeping lately, they've managed to break the laws of physics, again!!?
deice is offline  
Reply
Old 5th February 2008 | 22:38
  #15 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 46
Likes: 3
From: Fliegensville, Gold Coast Australia
What sort of thronomister will trhey use?
Fliegenmong is offline  
Reply
Old 6th February 2008 | 05:37
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Boy, that is fast!
Jonny Suave Trousers is offline  
Reply
Old 6th February 2008 | 07:01
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Estonia
18 times speed of LIGHT !? I must have been sleeping lately, they've managed to break the laws of physics, again!!?
5 years and 5 days ago, Columbia was rather notoriously announced to have crashed when flying at 18 times the speed of light. This indeed breaks the laws of physics.
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Reply
Old 6th February 2008 | 07:23
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
From: n/a



I know I know thread drift.
Daysleeper is offline  
Reply
Old 6th February 2008 | 07:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 0
From: Surrey Hills
Seeing as the thread is drifting....

As a young motion picture technician I was the actual pilot of the Fireflash
on the original TV series.

On Slough Trading Estate just behind the power station and Mars Bars factory!

Ah! The romance of movie making!
aviate1138 is offline  
Reply
Old 6th February 2008 | 07:45
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: Europe
It is rumoured that Ham and Enos are involved in the project. Apparently only a crew of their skill and experience can fly this thing.
Clarence Oveur is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.