Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Designers Unveil 4,000mph Passenger Jet

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Designers Unveil 4,000mph Passenger Jet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Feb 2008, 06:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: fife
Age: 41
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Designers Unveil 4,000mph Passenger Jet

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/...304022,00.html
W4LLACE is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 06:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It runs on a liquid hydrogen Scimitar engine being developed by Reaction Engines that is based on existing technology.
Wouldn't be a relative of the RB535 being developed years ago for HOTOL, would it?

Whatever happened to HOTOL, this'll go the same way.

Yawn.

TheOddOne
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 07:05
  #3 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,398
Received 1,587 Likes on 724 Posts
Skylon - son of Hotol and both the brainchild of Alan Bond.
ORAC is online now  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 12:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LGW
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like the "real world" is starting to catch up with thunderbirds! I remember seeing one episode featuring a new airliner that looked a lot like that sketch.

Last edited by Bat Fastard; 5th Feb 2008 at 12:16. Reason: spelling
Bat Fastard is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 13:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,500
Received 165 Likes on 89 Posts
Fireflash?

You mean this one?
TURIN is online now  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 13:23
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .
Age: 36
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An interesting design. Would be exciting if it was to be developed. I wonder how problems of aerodynamic overheating would be tacked though... fascinating.

No chance of that though, since Eco-Crusaders/Eco-Governments would no doubt torpedo the design. I can hear them choking on their sustainably-grown soya beans and lentils already.
Captain Smithy is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 13:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
143 metres

143 metres???

What are they doing with 143 metres? Even Beriev-Be-2500 finds 122 metres or so quite enough!

I can understand why Concorde likes to have a slender fuselage and long nosecone. The result is that Concorde is about 62 m long and has 25 seat rows at 4 abreast. She is considerably longer than E-190 (which has a similar passenger cabin) and matches the length of MD-11 (which accommodates 410 seats).

Now, L-2000 and Boeing 2707 target near 300 seats. L-2000 specifies 5 seats abreast, and is actually a couple of cm narrower than DC-9. 60 rows of 5 abreast would take up more space than the 172 seats of MD-80. L-2000 is supposed to be 85 m or so.

Various B-2705, Boeing HSCT, MD HSCT, Airbus AST and JAXA NEXST projects talk of 300 seats, too - and they think they need 90...104 metres. It would cause some problems with fuselage bending strength and tailstrike clearance, plus a nuisance at taxiways and gates...

But 143 metres? Where does it go? With 300 passengers?

If an airport can handle 150 m long planes, how many seats do you think should go on, say, an Airbus 380-1800 stretched to 141 m length?
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 13:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: .
Age: 36
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps the SLF have lots of legroom?

I'd imagine you'd need plenty of room for fuel too, travelling that fast.
Captain Smithy is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 14:48
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hold at Lambourne........!
BOBBLEHAT is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 18:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They forgot the windows?!
perkin is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 18:41
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They forgot the windows?!
They omitted them. Which is understandable for a freighter, and passenger airplanes like An-74 or Lockheed Galaxy - but those still have cockpit windows. Even shuttles which fly 18 times the speed of light and above have windscreen.

Try to taxi a plane 143 m long with no cockpit windows... Also, what do you think will the pitch angle be on touchdown?
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 21:54
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: wales
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no cockpit windows??
speed787 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 21:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Material Science and Windows

Who's to say, they are there but you can't see them.

The pilots see out, but not the other way, may be quite useful for heating effects ...

Suppose the land of science fiction ...
go-si is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 22:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even shuttles which fly 18 times the speed of light and above have windscreen
18 times speed of LIGHT !? I must have been sleeping lately, they've managed to break the laws of physics, again!!?
deice is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2008, 22:38
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fliegensville, Gold Coast Australia
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
What sort of thronomister will trhey use?
Fliegenmong is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2008, 05:37
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boy, that is fast!
Jonny Suave Trousers is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2008, 07:01
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
18 times speed of LIGHT !? I must have been sleeping lately, they've managed to break the laws of physics, again!!?
5 years and 5 days ago, Columbia was rather notoriously announced to have crashed when flying at 18 times the speed of light. This indeed breaks the laws of physics.
chornedsnorkack is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2008, 07:23
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: n/a
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts



I know I know thread drift.
Daysleeper is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2008, 07:37
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Surrey Hills
Posts: 1,478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seeing as the thread is drifting....

As a young motion picture technician I was the actual pilot of the Fireflash
on the original TV series.

On Slough Trading Estate just behind the power station and Mars Bars factory!

Ah! The romance of movie making!
aviate1138 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2008, 07:45
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is rumoured that Ham and Enos are involved in the project. Apparently only a crew of their skill and experience can fly this thing.
Clarence Oveur is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.