Mcrit over wings or not?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern CND
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mcrit over wings or not?
In my books they talk of Mcrit as point on the WINGS where airflow reaches M1.0. However on an aircraft like the 747 airflow will reach M1.0 over the hump before the wings.
So is:
Mcrit the speed when airflow over a point on the WINGS reach M1
OR
Mcrit is the speed when airflow over a ANY point on the aircraft reaches M1.
Thanks
So is:
Mcrit the speed when airflow over a point on the WINGS reach M1
OR
Mcrit is the speed when airflow over a ANY point on the aircraft reaches M1.
Thanks
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 38
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My understanding is that Mcrit is the highest speed at which no parts of the aircraft are supersonic. So in the context of this definition it wouldn't really matter whether the first part to go supersonic is the wing, or in the case of the 747, the hump.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Extensive discussion here by people who have some grip on the subject http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=83506
Post #29 by Flamgat in the above thread includes Boeings definition
"Critical Mach number is a term aerodynamicists use to quickly compare the "drag rise" or "compressibility drag" of several wing design alternatives. At Boeing, we define critical Mach number as the Mach number, at a constant lift coefficient, where the drag coefficient is 20 counts greater than the drag coefficient at the incompressible Mach number."
Post #29 by Flamgat in the above thread includes Boeings definition
"Critical Mach number is a term aerodynamicists use to quickly compare the "drag rise" or "compressibility drag" of several wing design alternatives. At Boeing, we define critical Mach number as the Mach number, at a constant lift coefficient, where the drag coefficient is 20 counts greater than the drag coefficient at the incompressible Mach number."
Last edited by Brian Abraham; 4th Feb 2008 at 22:14.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suspect it could legitimately be used to mean anything, depending on how it was phrased.
"Mcrit" of the aircraft
"Mcrit" of the wing (3d)
"Mcrit" of the section (2d)
And so on...
It doesn't really have much importance as a practical concern, once the design has started, anyway....
"Mcrit" of the aircraft
"Mcrit" of the wing (3d)
"Mcrit" of the section (2d)
And so on...
It doesn't really have much importance as a practical concern, once the design has started, anyway....
