FADEC
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coming back to the original topic, the answer is: depending on type. While most aircraft with FADEC engines do stop if both channels are dead, I know of at least one aircraft, the Avro RJ series, where they have one FADEC and one backup mode.
Intelligent ECU/EEC maybe. It's a bit of a hybrid as it was basically an upgraded mechanical linkage system from the 146 done on the cheap
Why does that not surprise me from BAe
Last edited by Just an Engineer; 22nd Jan 2008 at 20:44. Reason: Typo
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's been a while. But I thought the FRJ the engine would continue to work even if BOTH channels failed. I could be wrong, but I thought it had something like a "manual reversion".
On the ERJ, if the FADECs go, so does the engine.
On the ERJ, if the FADECs go, so does the engine.
Full ATSB Report on a 717 that had a FADEC failure followed by shutdown
The crew of the Boeing 717-200 aircraft reported that during the climb from Launceston airport, while passing 7,000 ft above sea level, the right engine sustained an uncommanded in-flight shutdown.
The right engine EEC sustained a failure of both channels of an independent two-channel system, resulting in an in-flight engine shutdown with no prior indications to the flight crew.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Birmingham, England (sometimes)
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is a huge amount of testing at lots of levels before any flight software is released - I know, it's kept me in work for twenty years! - most of it is done at the vendor's site but the integration/systems/acceptance is done at the customer's. Many eyes look over each step, independent test and design teams to try to achieve objectivity.
VnV
VnV
Quote:
Actually the FADEC can override the pilot if it decides a command is wrong in a given set of circumstances
Could you give an example please?
Actually the FADEC can override the pilot if it decides a command is wrong in a given set of circumstances
Could you give an example please?
However in the case of a redline exceedance the FADECD may latch at idle and not respond futher unless all power to mit is reset.
Your mileage may vary so please consult the individual manuals
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think that there would be a software download just before a flight.
There is a huge amount of testing at lots of levels before any flight software is released - I know, it's kept me in work for twenty years! - most of it is done at the vendor's site but the integration/systems/acceptance is done at the customer's. Many eyes look over each step, independent test and design teams to try to achieve objectivity.
In the inital testing or when revising any software then there would be software testing/integration/acceptance with the customer which in this case it would be the aircraft manafacturer
Once any software is finalised in the FADEC and delivered to the Airline however it should be relatively plug and play even if you are just replacing the FADEC's for a software revision.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"To be a true, 100%, Full Authority Digital Engine Control, there must not be any form of manual override available.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"To be a true, 100%, Full Authority Digital Engine Control, there must not be any form of manual override available.
False - the fire handles are hard wired through to the fuel control unit.
False - the fire handles are hard wired through to the fuel control unit.
Probabally agree (?) with your statement as it stands however you were a wee bit selective in your cut and paste
Full quote reads.....
"To be a true, 100%, Full Authority Digital Engine Control, there must not be any form of manual override available. This literally places full authority to the operating parameters of the engine in the hands of the computer. If a total FADEC failure occurs, the engine fails."
I think the key words here are operating parameters i.e normal operation not emergency.
Last edited by Just an Engineer; 23rd Jan 2008 at 15:24. Reason: Typo
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Birmingham, England (sometimes)
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JaE,
The provision of software and its download are two separate items.
Yes, once it has been build, tested and delivered it's fairly simple to put it into the FADEC - the 777 has an 'on-wing' facility which enables the software to be updated without taking the FADEC off the aircraft and swapping the computer cards. Even so, it's still a shop job, not the kind of thing that you do on a whim, and also the frequency of updates is very slow, we are talking of one every several years not daily like a PC!
I did try to find out when there was a release of new software for the T800 but it seems to have been some years back!.
VnV
The provision of software and its download are two separate items.
Yes, once it has been build, tested and delivered it's fairly simple to put it into the FADEC - the 777 has an 'on-wing' facility which enables the software to be updated without taking the FADEC off the aircraft and swapping the computer cards. Even so, it's still a shop job, not the kind of thing that you do on a whim, and also the frequency of updates is very slow, we are talking of one every several years not daily like a PC!
I did try to find out when there was a release of new software for the T800 but it seems to have been some years back!.
VnV
Last edited by VnV2178B; 23rd Jan 2008 at 18:22. Reason: I am an injuneer two an I carnt spel
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
VnV2178B
Software updates don't always require the FADEC to come off wing. The CFM engine on the 737NG for example can receive software updates very easily on wing. After completion, no engine run is required and of course both FADEC's have to be updated at the same time in order to maintain software commonality. This is the one occasion which breaks the "don't do work on both engines at the same time rule"...
Software updates don't always require the FADEC to come off wing. The CFM engine on the 737NG for example can receive software updates very easily on wing. After completion, no engine run is required and of course both FADEC's have to be updated at the same time in order to maintain software commonality. This is the one occasion which breaks the "don't do work on both engines at the same time rule"...
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Birmingham, England (sometimes)
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree again, it's not always the case that the FADEC has to come off wing for new software - I did say that that's true for the B777/Trent800 (and I assume the same for the other engine options - I only have experience of R-Rs in this case). Earlier versions (RB211 for 747 and T700 for Airbus) needed to have the FADEC/FAFC off-wing and a card reprogram. I assume also that the newer aircraft will also specify on-wing downloads. I just wanted to make the point that you don't change a FADEC software by logging into Microsoft update and pressing OK, at least not yet...
VnV
VnV
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North America
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just had a 172 equipped with a diesel engine running on FADEC and it is true that if you lose battery power that your engine dies. There's nothing you can do. To my knowledge all you can do is choose which computer to use and that's about it.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Software updates don't always require the FADEC to come off wing. The CFM engine on the 737NG for example can receive software updates very easily on wing. After completion, no engine run is required and of course both FADEC's have to be updated at the same time in order to maintain software commonality.
Even I am suprised at that one
I would have thought at least a ground idle run would be required even if its just to check for any generated faults. Would have thought some defects will only manifest themselves on a running engine.
Last edited by Just an Engineer; 24th Jan 2008 at 14:53. Reason: Typo