Question about B737 flap40 landing
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: China
Question about B737 flap40 landing
An instructor said that when 737 land with flap40, touchdown speed is just vref, there will be winglets stall occur, which cause horizontal control unsteadily.Is that right? I cannot find any depiction through the doc.
Any one have some idea? thanks.
Any one have some idea? thanks.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Actually I believe 'touchdown speed' is nominally Vref-5 although it is rare to see that flown correctly. Vref is the 'target speed' at 50' I believe?
bradlee - I am fairly new to winglets on the NG but I know nothing of this claim and I don't think that the winglets contribution to directional stability is significant. Perhaps CaptainSandL can help here? There is nothing I have seen from Boeing about it.
bradlee - I am fairly new to winglets on the NG but I know nothing of this claim and I don't think that the winglets contribution to directional stability is significant. Perhaps CaptainSandL can help here? There is nothing I have seen from Boeing about it.
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 26
From: Australia
Vref is the 'target speed' at 50' I believe?
For day to day operations the +5 is bled off approaching touch-down (defining "approaching" is a matter of many personal opinions). Touch down is acceptable at minus five from Vref. In practice it is extremely rare to see this as many pilots flare at anything from 5 to 15 knots faster than Vref due lazy flying techniques in calm wind and long runways.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
Correct, as I said.... but the point being that the NG does not fall out of the sky at Vref-5 and presumably does not suffer from this legendary 'winglet stall'? If it does, then Boeing do not know about it.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: On The Golf Course - On the River..!!
Boeing state that approach speed of Vref 30+5 or Vref 40+5 is flown in order that full manoever protection is assured at Flap 15 (go-around) configuration.
Stall speeds are therefore considerably less than Vref 40-5 or Vref 30-5 (although I can't lay my hands on the factor above Vs for Flap 30 or 40 configuration at the appropriate flap Vref speed).
Touchdown technique is to effect touchdown at a speed between Vref and Vref-5 as previously mentioned (power being slowly retarded during the roundout/flare) - note that on a -800(NG) tailstrike will occur at around +13 deg pitch (oleos extended) or +11 deg pitch (oleos compressed).
Cheers
ScottyD
Stall speeds are therefore considerably less than Vref 40-5 or Vref 30-5 (although I can't lay my hands on the factor above Vs for Flap 30 or 40 configuration at the appropriate flap Vref speed).
Touchdown technique is to effect touchdown at a speed between Vref and Vref-5 as previously mentioned (power being slowly retarded during the roundout/flare) - note that on a -800(NG) tailstrike will occur at around +13 deg pitch (oleos extended) or +11 deg pitch (oleos compressed).
Cheers
ScottyD
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: uk
I fly the NG with winglets and to be honest I DID notice a horizontal instability when near VREF. I don't know why but i had a scary ldg once in germany when i had a big wing drop very close to the ground with only a 10kt crosswind and no gust at all. Maybe your instructor knows something we don't.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 6
From: La Belle Province
....but the point being that the NG does not fall out of the sky at Vref-5 and presumably does not suffer from this legendary 'winglet stall'....
This is NOT B737-specific, but in a general sense, it's entirely possible that at the higher AOAs associated with the final stage of the approach/flare, the winglet is sufficiently off-design that there is a flow breakdown, or stall; if the winglet has been "tuned" for maximum efficiency in cruise, then the conditions at the tip may be very different. I certainly have heard of similar behaviour on other types (winglet stall, that is, not the control issues mentioned).
Personally, I would be surprised if there was a significant handling effect, as
(1) winglet retrofits have generally been accomplished without having to introduce handling limitations, and often on the basis of no change to handling (not perf, otherwise why bother!)
(2) if there were an effect, there would be numerous issues relating to asymmetric versus symmetric stalls, and I can't again recall of limitations which might be consistent with such a concern (xwind limit changes, etc.)
Again, personally, I'd be more inclined to attribute changes in control characteristics in the final stages of the approach to increasing ground effects, but that's just an opinion.
