pax dies just after take off
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: united arab emirates
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
pax dies just after take off
OK all , I know you are all getting sick of me and my scenario's but I am always astounded at the different opinions we all have with regards things after an incident so I am trying to see what is considered across the board before it happens.
OK so you take off ( at Max Weight). Just after take off the purser advises a passenger has had a heart attack and is in bad shape.
Now off course go back and land immediately to get the said person the help they need. But you will be so heavy and melt the fuse plugs and put everyone at risk with a break fire ( potentially ) going straight back.
So what would you do ???
My take is to go back and yes if you melt a few plugs to save a life thats ok. However we have had incidences in our airline where a diversion was initiated based on what was thought to be a heart attack and turned out to be a mere panic attack. Again fine I guess if the outcome is OK but imagine a break fire followed by an evacuation for this !!!
Again made much easier when diverting enroute as you will have time to jettison on the diversion and potentially landing at a suitable weight to not worry about the brakes burning.
Any more considerations ???
OK so you take off ( at Max Weight). Just after take off the purser advises a passenger has had a heart attack and is in bad shape.
Now off course go back and land immediately to get the said person the help they need. But you will be so heavy and melt the fuse plugs and put everyone at risk with a break fire ( potentially ) going straight back.
So what would you do ???
My take is to go back and yes if you melt a few plugs to save a life thats ok. However we have had incidences in our airline where a diversion was initiated based on what was thought to be a heart attack and turned out to be a mere panic attack. Again fine I guess if the outcome is OK but imagine a break fire followed by an evacuation for this !!!
Again made much easier when diverting enroute as you will have time to jettison on the diversion and potentially landing at a suitable weight to not worry about the brakes burning.
Any more considerations ???
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Thailand
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Overweight Landings
In the Autumn 2007 Flight Safety Focus magazine there is a very comprehensive article which will answer your 'scenario'.
There is no problem or danger carrying out an overweight landing. Aircraft are certified to land at their Max Take Off weight with a descent rate of 10feet/second. A normal landing would be at around 2-3 feet/sec and a 'hard' landing would be around 6-7ft/sec. If the patient needs medical attention without delay then a return and landing will be perfectly in order.
Incidentally, the fuse plugs would be very unlikely to melt if the aircraft lands on the runway of departure. They just might, although not for certain, melt if the aircraft had rejected the Take-Off from just below V1 at Max T/O weight.
So prepare for a landing ASAP and continue as normally. Save the life and be the heroes.
Mind you, you said he's dead so why hurry?
There is no problem or danger carrying out an overweight landing. Aircraft are certified to land at their Max Take Off weight with a descent rate of 10feet/second. A normal landing would be at around 2-3 feet/sec and a 'hard' landing would be around 6-7ft/sec. If the patient needs medical attention without delay then a return and landing will be perfectly in order.
Incidentally, the fuse plugs would be very unlikely to melt if the aircraft lands on the runway of departure. They just might, although not for certain, melt if the aircraft had rejected the Take-Off from just below V1 at Max T/O weight.
So prepare for a landing ASAP and continue as normally. Save the life and be the heroes.
Mind you, you said he's dead so why hurry?
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Over the Moon
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The title suggests the passenger has died, the narrative merely says hes had a heart attack and is in poor shape.
If I was told a pax had suffered a heart attack I'd be returning or diverting.
I wouldn't be waiting for a doctor to certify he had died (if one was on board) as minutes could matter. I'd get on with it declaring a Mayday for a medical emerg. If a doctor subsequently certifies the patient as dead then the decision would be re assessed.
If I was told a pax had suffered a heart attack I'd be returning or diverting.
I wouldn't be waiting for a doctor to certify he had died (if one was on board) as minutes could matter. I'd get on with it declaring a Mayday for a medical emerg. If a doctor subsequently certifies the patient as dead then the decision would be re assessed.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: 41,000 feet up
Age: 17
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To Spannersatcx
If they are dead why would you go back?
Think about the poor pax that has to sit to the dead person. Would you want to sit next to a corpse??????
Then again you could ask the crew nicely if you could have his meal tray. He wont be needing it
.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: flightdeck/earlyhours commute
Posts: 199
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Passenger dies just after takeoff?
A great many passengers travel accompanied. So grieving wife/husband etc?
Just after takeoff, I'm sure the majority of pax would understand a return. I'm equally sure many would question carrying on. So potentially a lot of additional problems later, especially for the cabin crew.
The only immediately governing factors to negate a return would be flight safety and weather.
Overweight landing. Not a major problem. You would do it for a great many technical reasons. Operate the aircraft normally.
Who is qualified to say the pax is actually dead? Unless there is a doctor sat next to the passenger at the time, then you are unlikely to have identified any medical personnel travelling. Assuming they own up.
A great many passengers travel accompanied. So grieving wife/husband etc?
Just after takeoff, I'm sure the majority of pax would understand a return. I'm equally sure many would question carrying on. So potentially a lot of additional problems later, especially for the cabin crew.
The only immediately governing factors to negate a return would be flight safety and weather.
Overweight landing. Not a major problem. You would do it for a great many technical reasons. Operate the aircraft normally.
Who is qualified to say the pax is actually dead? Unless there is a doctor sat next to the passenger at the time, then you are unlikely to have identified any medical personnel travelling. Assuming they own up.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm surprised no one has slapped inappropriate RIPs and commiserations all over these posts.
If a pilot dies it's everywhere. Why not for a pax, or are they somehow of less value - despite the fact we don't know them from Adam either???
If a pilot dies it's everywhere. Why not for a pax, or are they somehow of less value - despite the fact we don't know them from Adam either???
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would it be unreasonable to find out if he was going away on business or returning home to family. Might save them some hastle. Bad enough he's dead but having to deal with inquest overseas etc
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: In sight of the sharp-end, Oxon.
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I cant believe you asked!
"If a pilot dies it's everywhere. Why not for a pax, or are they somehow of less value "
Logically, if the pilot dies just after takeoff, it's kinda serious as he's supposed to be operating the aircraft (unless you're suggesting that pilots are redundant once airborne?).
If SLF opt to cease functioning early, it doesn't really affect the flight.
In that situation, pilots have more value, IMHO.
Logically, if the pilot dies just after takeoff, it's kinda serious as he's supposed to be operating the aircraft (unless you're suggesting that pilots are redundant once airborne?).
If SLF opt to cease functioning early, it doesn't really affect the flight.
In that situation, pilots have more value, IMHO.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hades.
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Incidentally, the fuse plugs would be very unlikely to melt if the aircraft lands on the runway of departure.
That depends on the a/c. Put a heavy back on the ground shortly after a MTOW departure and it's going to get hot down there
Better still, get a large roll of that catering wrap and .............
I'll bring my own biscuits
That depends on the a/c. Put a heavy back on the ground shortly after a MTOW departure and it's going to get hot down there
Better still, get a large roll of that catering wrap and .............
I'll bring my own biscuits
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only asking, as I've met a few a/c on arrival that have had a pax die en route and they have carried on, recently wife's mothers relation died ex HKG en route to JFK via YVR, they never turned back and the body was removed at YVR and a few days later completed the journey to JFK. He was travelling with Son and Daughter I believe, I guess it depends where and when it happens and who with.
Fourgolds,
Do not assume that all overweight landings will result in melting of the tyre fuse plugs. I have personally landed a A340 at 5tonnes below max TOW some 12 mins after take-off due to a major problem. Remember the brake energy to be dissipated from a V1 stop (given the field length remaining) is a lot higher than that required from a broadly similar (say 30kts faster) landing achieved at the start of the runway - especially if full reverse is available and one is able to modulate the braking to match the distance available. For the doubters out there we touched down at a Vapp of 177 kts, used full reverse on all engines on a 3500m runway and achieved brake temps of 400c!!
Do not assume that all overweight landings will result in melting of the tyre fuse plugs. I have personally landed a A340 at 5tonnes below max TOW some 12 mins after take-off due to a major problem. Remember the brake energy to be dissipated from a V1 stop (given the field length remaining) is a lot higher than that required from a broadly similar (say 30kts faster) landing achieved at the start of the runway - especially if full reverse is available and one is able to modulate the braking to match the distance available. For the doubters out there we touched down at a Vapp of 177 kts, used full reverse on all engines on a 3500m runway and achieved brake temps of 400c!!
