minimum for alternate airports?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I assume you're talking about at the planning stage.
Basically JAR-OPS says you need to have weather forecast for ETA +1/-1hr which is one 'category' better than the available approach aids:
Is that what you're looking for?
Basically JAR-OPS says you need to have weather forecast for ETA +1/-1hr which is one 'category' better than the available approach aids:
For selection as a destination alternate or en-route alternate, an airport must satisfy the following conditions:
• Meteorological reports and/or forecasts must indicate that the weather at the airport will be at or above the planning minima specified in the Table below for ± 1 hour of the aircraft's expected time of arrival:
Type of Approach v. Planning Minima
Cat II and III Approach - Cat I minima forecast (Note 1)
Cat I Approach - Non-Precision minima forecast (Note 1, 2 and 3)
Non-Precision Approach - Non-Precision minima forecast (Note 2) MDH plus 200ft/vis plus 1,000m
Circling Approach - Circling minima forecast
NOTE:
1 Runway Visual Range
2 The ceiling must be at or above the Minimum Descent Height
3 A localiser only approach is considered acceptable in this context.
• Meteorological reports and/or forecasts must indicate that the weather at the airport will be at or above the planning minima specified in the Table below for ± 1 hour of the aircraft's expected time of arrival:
Type of Approach v. Planning Minima
Cat II and III Approach - Cat I minima forecast (Note 1)
Cat I Approach - Non-Precision minima forecast (Note 1, 2 and 3)
Non-Precision Approach - Non-Precision minima forecast (Note 2) MDH plus 200ft/vis plus 1,000m
Circling Approach - Circling minima forecast
NOTE:
1 Runway Visual Range
2 The ceiling must be at or above the Minimum Descent Height
3 A localiser only approach is considered acceptable in this context.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it's that.
so i just need to add one category.
let say i can land cat2, but minimum weather must be good for cat1 (200ft/550RVR).
if i can land only Cat1, i will use minimum weather for a VOR approach.
in this case i can file the airport as alternate?
but I can still land the way I want?this is only for planning?.
the numbers I got in my first post are FAA rules.
so i just need to add one category.
let say i can land cat2, but minimum weather must be good for cat1 (200ft/550RVR).
if i can land only Cat1, i will use minimum weather for a VOR approach.
in this case i can file the airport as alternate?
but I can still land the way I want?this is only for planning?.
the numbers I got in my first post are FAA rules.
I assume you've been here first: http://www.jaa.nl/publications/jars/jar-ops-1.pdf
Statute miles are not JAR.
If you are JAR OPS you will be operating to an Ops Manual Part A: what does that say?
Statute miles are not JAR.
If you are JAR OPS you will be operating to an Ops Manual Part A: what does that say?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 1,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
let say i can land cat2, but minimum weather must be good for cat1 (200ft/550RVR).
if i can land only Cat1, i will use minimum weather for a VOR approach.
in this case i can file the airport as alternate?
but I can still land the way I want?this is only for planning?.
but I can still land the way I want?this is only for planning?.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: EU
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes, i am confused.
but I think I start to gte it staight.
under FAA, rules are 600-800 ft AGL and 2 sm.
under JAA, they use higher category approach for planning and reference to a chart (linked by 212man)which is slighly more complicated.But only RVR is limitating.
but I think I start to gte it staight.
under FAA, rules are 600-800 ft AGL and 2 sm.
under JAA, they use higher category approach for planning and reference to a chart (linked by 212man)which is slighly more complicated.But only RVR is limitating.
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: EU & USA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dartagnan,
I have criticized you in the past, and this just shows to prove that you shouldn’t be flying an airplane. How can you be bitter at Vueling for firing you when you don’t know:
How did you ever pass the Interview? These are the most basic operational rules that a pilot should know. I would think that if a pilot was confused on these topics, he would pick up a copy of JAR-OPS 1. Do you even know what this document is?
Seriously, have you thought about taking up a career at McDonalds?
I have criticized you in the past, and this just shows to prove that you shouldn’t be flying an airplane. How can you be bitter at Vueling for firing you when you don’t know:
- Fuel Requirements
- Alternate Minimums
- MEA, MSA
How did you ever pass the Interview? These are the most basic operational rules that a pilot should know. I would think that if a pilot was confused on these topics, he would pick up a copy of JAR-OPS 1. Do you even know what this document is?
Seriously, have you thought about taking up a career at McDonalds?