Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

767-300 fmc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Nov 2007, 05:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 767-300 fmc

After recieving a "Fuel disagree Progress 2/2" message in the FMS scratchpad, what actions are taken? if any? Fuel status at the time was 40K in wing tank and 0 in center.

Dave F.
dfish is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2007, 05:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Standing at P37
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Quantity Processor
The value of FMC calculated fuel quantity is set equal to the total
fuel quantity from the fuel quantity processor when the airplane is on
the ground and there is no fuel flow. When fuel flow begins, the
initial fuel quantity value is saved for all future calculations and the
fuel flow input data from the EICAS computer is integrated, summed
and saved. FMC calculated fuel is computed by subtracting the fuel
flow sum from the initial fuel quantity value. Throughout the flight,
the difference between FMC calculated fuel and total fuel quantity is
computed. If the difference exceeds 1360 kgs, a CDU alert message
is generated (FUEL DISAGREE - Prog Pg 2). To avoid false alarms
due to slosh during maneuvers the fuel discrepancy must exceed 910
kgs for 6 minutes before the 1360 kg threshold is checked.

After recieving a "Fuel disagree Progress 2/2" message in the FMS scratchpad, what actions are taken?

Not sure what actions, I guess you could look for a possible fuel leak.
I.E If you started with 50k, and your fuel Totaliser is now indicating 40k, yet the left eng fuel flow transmitter has counted 4k used and the right eng fuel flow transmitter has counted 4k (8k total burn) what has happened to the other 2k??

One of a few things is the prob here.

1) one of the fuel flow transmitters is inaccurate.
2)The fuel quantity indication system is inaccurate.
3) Fuel is being lost somewhere.
4)EICAS computer is sending bad info to FMC
5)FMC is stuffing up its calculations.

This defect pops up from time to time and we generally replace one of the eng fuel flow transmitters.
Spanner Turner is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2007, 06:12
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Standing at P37
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Further info on FMC progress page, if you can determine if it's the Totaliser system or the Fuel Flow Transmitter system you can inhibit their input into calculations as per the instructions highlighted below.


Progress Page 2/2 is accessed by pressing NEXT PAGE key when on
Progress Page 1/2.
Data Fields
1L-1R WIND COMPONENTS/WIND VECTOR
2L XTK ERROR - Displays current cross track error.
3L-3R TAS/SAT - Displays current true airspeed and static air
temperature.
5L Blank unless there is a 1360 kg discrepancy between the totalizer
and calculated fuel values. If a discrepancy occurs, the line select
fields are formatted as shown. Line selection causes the system to
use the fuel totalizer input and inhibits the calculation of fuel used
based on fuel flow. Line 6R, CALCULATED FUEL, blanks if 5L is
selected.
2R VTK ERROR - Displays current vertical track error with respect
to a path descent. (Blank when descent not active.)
5R Same as 5L except that selection causes the system to use the
calculated fuel and inhibits the totalizer input. Line 6L, TOTALIZER
FUEL, blanks if 5R is selected.
6L-6R Manual entry of fuel quantity on the PERF INIT page is
propagated to line 6R and is the initial value of fuel quantity used.
Line 6L is blank and subsequent totalizer inputs are ignored.

Spanner Turner is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2007, 08:21
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
Posts: 4,294
Received 170 Likes on 87 Posts
After recieving a "Fuel disagree Progress 2/2" message in the FMS scratchpad, what actions are taken?
Is it a non normal checklist item? Maybe not all airlines have it as such!
Capt Fathom is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2007, 13:43
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The value of FMC calculated fuel quantity is set equal to the total fuel quantity from the fuel quantity processor when the airplane is on the ground and there is no fuel flow."

Hope you don't mind if I introduce a little drift. Say you're off to a field with no ground services, and when you get there, you discover that the APU is now inop, so you keep one engine running for the (short) turnaround. After you load the FMC with the new route etc., how is the Totalizer / Calculated fuel affected, since you always had a fuel flow? Suppose you need to refuel?

I know that this is a bit of a stretch, definitely improbable, but not impossible.
Check Airman is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2007, 16:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know that this is a bit of a stretch, definitely improbable, but not impossible.


Well, there's a procedure for the Airbus 320 where by you have to reset a few C/Bs in order to reset the fuel used to cero... I've never flew a boeing (unfortunatelly) but maybe there's some similar procedure to deal with that improbable (but not impossible) situation...
downsouth is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2007, 01:15
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the feedback gentlemen.

Dave F.
dfish is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2007, 20:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe a little offtopic, but how do you put 40.000 kilograms of fuel into the wing tanks of a 767-300? I thought it is around 37 tons max. Or did you mean 40k liters (or even 40k lbs)?
oncenterline is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2007, 04:29
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That would be 40k Pounds.

Dave F.
dfish is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2007, 06:29
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Up left - Down right
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Write a log entry and let me look at it, don't know what your SOP is in F/D. it is common enough not to be concerned unless you have a very tight fuel load.

Last edited by Short_Circuit; 11th Nov 2007 at 06:30. Reason: still looking for razor blades
Short_Circuit is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2007, 12:57
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Umm... QRH to rule out or to confirm fuel leak, select totalizer or calculated based on your findings. As far as what to do after you land after your flight, consult your trusty MEL and you will be sure to find all the good stuff that needs to be done. ie: manual fuel drip check. I do believe that would involve an AME. Doing a drip check is one of the most fool proof ways of determining whether or not we used more fuel than planned and that was recorded by the FMS.
Short_Circuit: I think I agree with you, but to clarify bout not being concerned with being 'tight' on fuel, I know where I come from that we are not in the habit of carrying around loads of extra fuel for no apparent reason. Take what is required (due consideration to weather, anticipated traffic and contingencies); tankering only if fuel is at a premium at our planned destination. Drips are deemed to be accurate, that is where we would be making our fuel decisions from. Yeah? Yeah sure!!
Engine running while boarding and loading baggage? which one would you shut down? assuming there are no ground services I would also expect to be using stairs as apposed to an air bridge. Which one would you be shutting down? Suck the men and luggage into the engine or perhaps the little old lady with the poodle trying to make it to the stairs. I can see the headlines now... Poodle gets sucked into jet engine after chasing after owners wig! I'm sure this does happen in some parts of the world, but nowhere i have seen, and I've been to some rough places. That being said, I'm sure it does happen.
Solution... shut right down, deal with freight, start it back up, shut left down, deal with pax. Do-able, but come one... not the a/c designed for the bush now is it. Fuel... as far as I can tell, you might be able to reset the FMS by flipping the dates, or a couple breakers. Not sure.
yoohoo748 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.