Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Very basic EPR question.


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Very basic EPR question.

Old 24th October 2007 | 08:14
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: in da 'pit
Very basic EPR question.

Just a quicky, I cant find any ref for this and have done a search etc.

The numbers represented on the EPR gauge. If you have 1.85 EPR set, does that mean the jet pipe pressure/integrated pressure is 1.85 * the compressor inlet pressure? IE a ratio of 1:1.85 - seems a little low.
Never used EPR only N1.
skywaytoheaven is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2007 | 08:37
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 4
From: England
seems a little low
Try quantifying it, you'll feel better. Back of an envelope approximation:

Say we have an engine with a fan diameter of 5 feet. Thats a radius of 30 inches.

pi R squared for the fan area gives about 2,800 square inches.

Atmospheric pressure at sea level 14.7 psi. EPR of 1.85 means the prssure differential is 14.7 *.85 = 12.5 psi.

Pressure x Area = Force = 12.5 * 2,800 = 35,000 lbs of thrust.

Pretty fair?
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2007 | 10:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Stockholm Sweden
Remember that RR use IEPR. Integrated EPR when they measure the EPR in the jet pipe and the fan outlet and add them together in a little box. So EPR is the total pressure out the back, not just the jet pipe.
Swedish Steve is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2007 | 10:36
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
From: Gweriniaeth Cymru
SS,
almost there. IEPR because on the RB211 engine the pressure from the 'back end' of the engine is integrated/combined with combustor pressure. So you've got integrated pressure (P.int) and fan pressure (P.fan), actually a mixture of LP turbine pressure (P.E) and combustor pressure (P4), though I'm not sure of the exact ratio of these pressures. The equation for IEPR on an RB211 is as folows:

Integrated Pressure (P.int)/Fan Pressure (P.fan) = IEPR

Brgd's
N1 Vibes
N1 Vibes is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2007 | 12:11
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: in da 'pit
Thanks Capt P-B and others, appreciated.
skywaytoheaven is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2007 | 12:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Stockholm Sweden
N1 Vibes
OK this is from the RB211-524G MM 77-11-00
Signals from the LP compressor exhaust pressure (fan outlet)(P1.3) and gas generator exhaust pressure (P5) are supplied from rakes to the multiple connector where they are integrated and the resultant pressure (PINT) then moves to the FAFC.
LP compressor entrance air goes to the P2/T2 probe and flows to the FAFC.
The FAFC supplies EPR to the flightdeck.
The multiple connector is a tube with two different sized baffles in it, one baffle for P5 and one baffle for P1.3.
Combustor pressure is not involved in EPR.
Swedish Steve is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2007 | 13:55
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: in da 'pit
Ok another one for you: Why does EPR need to be set by 80 kts?
I would think, because of the Ram rise effect. Above 80 kts the EPR reading will not be as accurate as below???
skywaytoheaven is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2007 | 15:23
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 1
From: wherever
Yes because of RAM effect the inlet pressure increases and therefore the TO EPR can no longer be used as an indication of take off thrust. If you were to look closely you will see the EPR roll back a tad. The GA EPR takes this RAM increase into effect.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Reply
Old 24th October 2007 | 18:50
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: sussex
Capt PB. Your "back of envelope" formula work out pretty well for a P&W JT9 and a RR RB 211..................but, in calculating the area, we have disregarded the fairly high percentage of intake area blanked by the spinner.
which, one would have thought, should be subtracted ?
Why do the sums work out ?
virgo is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.