Uncategorized ILS28 at LSZH
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Uncategorized ILS28 at LSZH
The EAG company ILS Approach Chart for RWY 28 at LSZH says: „Uncategorized ILS Approach RWY 28 due to RWY Type. Non- Instrument RWY“.
What does the word Uncategorized mean. What is so special for RWY 28 at LSZH?
I know it has been a Non Precision Approach before, but the RWY has Centerline Lights, PAPI 3.3degrees and an Approachlight System.
What does the word Uncategorized mean. What is so special for RWY 28 at LSZH?
I know it has been a Non Precision Approach before, but the RWY has Centerline Lights, PAPI 3.3degrees and an Approachlight System.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dubai
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Purely a guess, but maybe it is something to do with the regular "Glide Slope" GPWS warnings on this approach, even though the aircraft is tracking the correct angle.
Regards
TOD
Regards
TOD
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"uncategorized" means it doesn't fit into the Cat I, II and III classification system. The reason is that it has one or more parameters different to one of these categories.
In the named case it is obviously the steeper glide slope, thus the higher minimum. Reason for the G/S are obstacles.
Dani
In the named case it is obviously the steeper glide slope, thus the higher minimum. Reason for the G/S are obstacles.
Dani
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting discussion....
Dani,
I don't have access to the chart, can you give us the LSZH ils GS angle and higher minimums?
And what is the maximum the GS can be then before it is categorized as "uncategorized".
I don't have access to the chart, can you give us the LSZH ils GS angle and higher minimums?
And what is the maximum the GS can be then before it is categorized as "uncategorized".
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Samsonite Avenue
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was asking the same question recently!
I found this Swiss AIC helpful.
http://www.skyguide.ch/de/AIMService...011_2006_E.pdf
Hope this will help!
I found this Swiss AIC helpful.
http://www.skyguide.ch/de/AIMService...011_2006_E.pdf
Hope this will help!
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: deco stop
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ils 28
was installed due to many complaints that whenever the weather was bad, or at night the Germans would not permit the overflights on the other ILS runways.
So traffic was forced to land on 28.
Thus the ILS was installed.
But to call it UNCAT is a new one on me, so can we see a rash of UNCAT ILS's. Most ILS's in smaller Swiss airports have several complications, so perhaps they should introduce a new cat "Cat 0".
So traffic was forced to land on 28.
Thus the ILS was installed.
But to call it UNCAT is a new one on me, so can we see a rash of UNCAT ILS's. Most ILS's in smaller Swiss airports have several complications, so perhaps they should introduce a new cat "Cat 0".
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Geezer's link mentions that
"At Zurich Airport, "UNCAT" has been employed for the ILS runway 28 due to physical characteristics of the aerodrome infrastructure (e.g. runway strip width, distance from TWY A and B to runway centre line, location of runway holding positions) and obstacle clearance after passing the approach minimum down to the landing threshold 28 (dimension and slope of the Annex 14 obstacle limitation surfaces)."
Does the chart specify what the deviation from a standard ICAO ils is? After all, in minimum visibility, it would be nice to know where and how high these obstacles are. And whether the "uncat" designation due to infrastructure is simply because a taxiway is closer to the runway that permitted....
"At Zurich Airport, "UNCAT" has been employed for the ILS runway 28 due to physical characteristics of the aerodrome infrastructure (e.g. runway strip width, distance from TWY A and B to runway centre line, location of runway holding positions) and obstacle clearance after passing the approach minimum down to the landing threshold 28 (dimension and slope of the Annex 14 obstacle limitation surfaces)."
Does the chart specify what the deviation from a standard ICAO ils is? After all, in minimum visibility, it would be nice to know where and how high these obstacles are. And whether the "uncat" designation due to infrastructure is simply because a taxiway is closer to the runway that permitted....
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no no, it's the other way around. Because it is not standard (obstacles, G/S angle, runway layout, lights etc), the minimum has to be lifted. And as soon as an ILS is not 200/550 anymore, it's not a CAT I anymore. It's pretty simple. "Uncategorized" means simply: Neighter Cat I, II or III. It's not a category itself, they just want to tell you that it's not 200/550.
If it's further away from standards, like in LUG, Swiss Authorities and other renamed it to an IGS, meaning it's not a precision approach at all anymore, although everything is there: ILS, Loc, G/S, approach lights, runway.
Dani
If it's further away from standards, like in LUG, Swiss Authorities and other renamed it to an IGS, meaning it's not a precision approach at all anymore, although everything is there: ILS, Loc, G/S, approach lights, runway.
Dani
