Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Turbulence over the Lake District 24th Sep

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Turbulence over the Lake District 24th Sep

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Sep 2007, 16:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbulence over the Lake District 24th Sep

Anyone one else spill their coffee this morning over the Lakes?! First bit of really rough turbulence I've experience, and the worst the Captain had seen... Autopilot did a good job of holding level flight despite picking up rate of climb/descent briefly exceeding 2500fpm. All in a days work though. Nice and calm lower down too.
Mungo Man is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2007, 16:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much/any warning did you get?
glad rag is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2007, 17:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Location
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the autopliot stayed in, it can't have been too bad ....
AltFlaps is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2007, 18:12
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guess it wasn't too bad, but neither was it light chop! Reading the standard definitions of turbulence I suppose it was moderate occasionally severe. Just because the autopilot didn't give up doesn't really mean it wasn't bad. Maybe I shouldn't have said the autopilot did a good job though, rather, it remained engaged but only held height +/- 400ft and speed +/- 40kts.
Mungo Man is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2007, 18:19
  #5 (permalink)  
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On the western edge of The Moor
Age: 67
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a comparason it was very varied on the ground with winds approx 40 - 50mph and frequent very heavy showers. Our wx at work gave 40% risk of lightning am & 60% pm.
Heard a turboprop at about 14:00 tracking I guess DCS - WAL seemed to be making a lot of noise and slow progress. Usually they are audible but this was loud even over the wind noise (an earlier one was audible in a large noisyish office)
west lakes is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2007, 18:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Mungo

Hopefully you don't have any problems elsewhere.
hetfield is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2007, 18:57
  #7 (permalink)  

Spink Pots
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Up in the air
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was quite bumpy in the LTMA today, a lot of the drivers were having to hand fly the aircraft around the holds.
Scuzi is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2007, 19:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
flew in as pax on the BMA751 from LAS this morning. was a bit bumpy. nothing to write home about. bit of a cross wind into man though.

It was the captain's last flight before retirement aswell. Typical British weather to see him out! Good luck to him and may he enjoy his retirement. Sorry I cant remember his name.
WAIF-er is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2007, 20:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Age: 55
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Returned from Cologne early evening into Heathrow, very bumpy around the hold, greaser of a landing though.
MarcJF is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2007, 21:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Believe the skipper on the Midland 751 was Capt Mark Marsh and understand he's going to swap the air for the sea in retirement. Best of luck for the future Mark and watch out for those pirates!!!
K.Whyjelly is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2007, 21:08
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: North of the Border
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you thought it was bumpy at flight level nosebleed you should of tried it down in the weeds in a helo. Some points in autorotation and still going up at a fair old lick. To say it was a bit rough would be an understatement!!!
s61fun is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 14:21
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a point of interest, does 2400 hrs GMT exist?

Clearly it is 2359 hrs or 0001 hrs, but what about midnight, should it be 2400 or, as I prefer, 0000 hrs?

Thoughts .....
TopBunk is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2008, 14:28
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: UK
Age: 55
Posts: 191
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2400 seems more logical, but 0000 is shown on my digital watch. If you think about it you get to 23.59.59, but why then 24.00.00 when the next time is 00.00.01? Like you i'm in favour of 00.00.00.
MarcJF is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.