Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Turbulence over the Lake District 24th Sep

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Turbulence over the Lake District 24th Sep

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th September 2007 | 16:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: UK
Turbulence over the Lake District 24th Sep

Anyone one else spill their coffee this morning over the Lakes?! First bit of really rough turbulence I've experience, and the worst the Captain had seen... Autopilot did a good job of holding level flight despite picking up rate of climb/descent briefly exceeding 2500fpm. All in a days work though. Nice and calm lower down too.
Mungo Man is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2007 | 16:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,609
Likes: 0
From: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
How much/any warning did you get?
glad rag is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2007 | 17:36
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Location
If the autopliot stayed in, it can't have been too bad ....
AltFlaps is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2007 | 18:12
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: UK
Guess it wasn't too bad, but neither was it light chop! Reading the standard definitions of turbulence I suppose it was moderate occasionally severe. Just because the autopilot didn't give up doesn't really mean it wasn't bad. Maybe I shouldn't have said the autopilot did a good job though, rather, it remained engaged but only held height +/- 400ft and speed +/- 40kts.
Mungo Man is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2007 | 18:19
  #5 (permalink)  
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
From: On the western edge of The Moor
As a comparason it was very varied on the ground with winds approx 40 - 50mph and frequent very heavy showers. Our wx at work gave 40% risk of lightning am & 60% pm.
Heard a turboprop at about 14:00 tracking I guess DCS - WAL seemed to be making a lot of noise and slow progress. Usually they are audible but this was loud even over the wind noise (an earlier one was audible in a large noisyish office)
west lakes is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2007 | 18:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
From: Choroni, sometimes
@Mungo

Hopefully you don't have any problems elsewhere.
hetfield is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2007 | 18:57
  #7 (permalink)  

Spink Pots
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Up in the air
It was quite bumpy in the LTMA today, a lot of the drivers were having to hand fly the aircraft around the holds.
Scuzi is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2007 | 19:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire, England
flew in as pax on the BMA751 from LAS this morning. was a bit bumpy. nothing to write home about. bit of a cross wind into man though.

It was the captain's last flight before retirement aswell. Typical British weather to see him out! Good luck to him and may he enjoy his retirement. Sorry I cant remember his name.
WAIF-er is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2007 | 20:52
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: UK
Returned from Cologne early evening into Heathrow, very bumpy around the hold, greaser of a landing though.
MarcJF is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2007 | 21:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: UK
Believe the skipper on the Midland 751 was Capt Mark Marsh and understand he's going to swap the air for the sea in retirement. Best of luck for the future Mark and watch out for those pirates!!!
K.Whyjelly is offline  
Reply
Old 24th September 2007 | 21:08
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: North of the Border
If you thought it was bumpy at flight level nosebleed you should of tried it down in the weeds in a helo. Some points in autorotation and still going up at a fair old lick. To say it was a bit rough would be an understatement!!!
s61fun is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd March 2008 | 14:21
  #12 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 3
From: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
As a point of interest, does 2400 hrs GMT exist?

Clearly it is 2359 hrs or 0001 hrs, but what about midnight, should it be 2400 or, as I prefer, 0000 hrs?

Thoughts .....
TopBunk is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd March 2008 | 14:28
  #13 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: UK
2400 seems more logical, but 0000 is shown on my digital watch. If you think about it you get to 23.59.59, but why then 24.00.00 when the next time is 00.00.01? Like you i'm in favour of 00.00.00.
MarcJF is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.