Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

B777 Holding Altitudes

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

B777 Holding Altitudes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th September 2007 | 15:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Down South
B777 Holding Altitudes

Hello All.
I was having a look at the Holding table in the FCOM and came up with the following:
It seems the heavier the aircraft is, the lower fuel flow per engine is achieved at a LOWER altitude. i.e 240T-15000ft-3350, 220T-20000-3050 etc. Now I thought if you were going to hold you'd be better off holding as high as you can provided you're not way above optimum. Only at 160T do we get up to 30000.
These numbers are for a -200 and the same principle applies on the -300 table-just the numbers are different obviously.
Now, either I'm missing something or I've forgotten some theory I should know, but I'm not sure if I understand this!?
Any ideas?
BMM389EC is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2007 | 03:01
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 10
From: 4 seasons hotel
Think again,the holding speed would differ at different altitude thus different fuel flow.Please refer your Jepps for ICAO or FAA max holding speeds table.
flightleader is offline  
Reply
Old 6th September 2007 | 03:57
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, UAE
Best holding is to do with min fuel flow. This is normally achieved at V MIn Drag or best L/D ratio.
So the best holding speed in the 777 is normally just above the amber line, which is independent of alt. (IAS/CAS). (Same principle applies to drift down speed)
However, Drag is relative to TAS so the higher you go, the higher the TAS for the same IAS/CAS speed, and so the higher the drag. Obviously, at lower alts, the F/F is higher so there is a cross over and that is best hold.
singleseater is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2007 | 04:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From: KUL
hi BMM,

i guess in this case there are 2 variables i.e. weight and altitude. actually, the 3rd variable would be the holding speed but i guess in this case it assumes the best holding speed from FMC.

for a given weight, you will noticed the best FF will be achieved at a certain altitude i.e. optimum altitude. if you move away from that alt, either up or down, the FF increases.

so, in your example for 240T the opt holding alt is 15,000' whilst for 220T the opt holding alt is 20,000'. obviously, the FF for 240T will be higher than 220T i.e. 3350 Vs 3050.

hope this helps...

SR
SuperRanger is offline  
Reply
Old 9th September 2007 | 08:05
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Over Graz
Done performance on 777 long time ago, but there is something about FL250 being the best holding altitude for the B777. Corrections/inputs anyone?
Boeing tables are usually very precise; they generate them from the "B" tests.
Thylakoid is offline  
Reply
Old 10th September 2007 | 05:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: sydney
Thumbs up

i agree. boeing knows the numbers
triathlon is offline  
Reply
Old 14th September 2007 | 04:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: on the edge
Wow, BMM, am impressed with your astuteness. What were you flying before, a Cherokee 140???
gimmesumvalium is offline  
Reply
Old 29th December 2019 | 23:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Originally Posted by singleseater
Best holding is to do with min fuel flow. This is normally achieved at V MIn Drag or best L/D ratio.
So the best holding speed in the 777 is normally just above the amber line, which is independent of alt. (IAS/CAS). (Same principle applies to drift down speed)
However, Drag is relative to TAS so the higher you go, the higher the TAS for the same IAS/CAS speed, and so the higher the drag. Obviously, at lower alts, the F/F is higher so there is a cross over and that is best hold.
B777 Amber speed line isn’t effected by alt?? Hmm
Bosche is offline  
Reply
Old 30th December 2019 | 05:50
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 8
From: australia
For what it’s worth, if I remember correctly, the B737-8 anywhere between FL410 and 3000 ft, the difference in hourly burn was about a cup full an hour, from the performance inflight bit of the QRH
324906 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th December 2019 | 13:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 9,226
Likes: 996
From: Seat 1A
That's a record: 12 years between posts!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Reply
Old 30th December 2019 | 17:17
  #11 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: Mordor
Originally Posted by Capn Bloggs
That's a record: 12 years between posts!
That's called 'necroposting'
Sidestick_n_Rudder is offline  
Reply
Old 31st December 2019 | 04:47
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 8
From: australia
I think I’m a slow thinker, will let you know at the end of the next decade, after I’ve thought it through
324906 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.