Definitions for ZFW, ETW, Basic Weight, etc
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Definitions for ZFW, ETW, Basic Weight, etc
Can someone please point me in the direction of a source for the definitions of such terms as APS Weight, ZFW, ETW, Basic Weight, Dry Operating Weight, and the like?
I expect some will prove to be synonymous but I would like to refresh my memory on the more subtle differences between the others.
My grateful thanks, in anticipation ...
JD
I expect some will prove to be synonymous but I would like to refresh my memory on the more subtle differences between the others.
My grateful thanks, in anticipation ...
JD
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Around
Age: 56
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
APS and Basic Weight (BW) is the same and constitutes an empty aircraft + non-useable fuel, oil, equipment (e.g. gally ovens) and documentation.
DOW = BW + the operating crew and their bagage
ZFW = DOW + payload
ETW: Haven't a clue, never heard of that one before.
DOW = BW + the operating crew and their bagage
ZFW = DOW + payload
ETW: Haven't a clue, never heard of that one before.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: N57
Age: 37
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ETW - Estimated take off weight, for planning purposes.
try www.pilotfriend.com and the weight and balance section.
try www.pilotfriend.com and the weight and balance section.
Guest
Posts: n/a
The definition of ZFW that I was given during the ATPL theory course, was that for some aircraft it includes fuel in the centre tank 
Now I know there are some issues with some 737 models in this regard, does this definition of ZFW exist for any other aircraft?
Now I know there are some issues with some 737 models in this regard, does this definition of ZFW exist for any other aircraft?
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AEP
Age: 80
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wing Bending Weight
Some early versions of the Learjets 20 series had a Max ZFW that included any fuel located in fuselage tank. This is called "wing bending weight"...
xxx
Happy contrails
xxx
Happy contrails
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Around
Age: 56
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Steve,
Not for Weight & Balance purposes, as the DOW is associated with DOI. DOI will always be the same for a given aircraft, but LIZFW (Loaded Index at ZFW) will differ depending on how the aircraft's been loaded.
Hence, you'll start with DOW and DOI, then add the weight of the payload to get ZFW (if, indeed, the flight is carrying payload which is not always the case).
For aircraft which requires ballast fuel in order to trim without payload (for instance MD11 or B727), the ZFW will include the ballast fuel.
So is ETW = Empty Tank Weight (and thus the same as ZFW?) or Estimated Take-off Weight, and if it's the latter shouldn't it then be ETOW?
Not for Weight & Balance purposes, as the DOW is associated with DOI. DOI will always be the same for a given aircraft, but LIZFW (Loaded Index at ZFW) will differ depending on how the aircraft's been loaded.
Hence, you'll start with DOW and DOI, then add the weight of the payload to get ZFW (if, indeed, the flight is carrying payload which is not always the case).
For aircraft which requires ballast fuel in order to trim without payload (for instance MD11 or B727), the ZFW will include the ballast fuel.
So is ETW = Empty Tank Weight (and thus the same as ZFW?) or Estimated Take-off Weight, and if it's the latter shouldn't it then be ETOW?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, FFF, I would also expect ETW (Empty Tank Weight) to be the same as ZFW.
However, the point of posting this thread was to seek the definitive source - maybe ICAO/IATA or CAA or such - for these terms. It's the source of the definitions I am after - much as I appreciate everyone chipping in with their two penn'orth ...
JD
However, the point of posting this thread was to seek the definitive source - maybe ICAO/IATA or CAA or such - for these terms. It's the source of the definitions I am after - much as I appreciate everyone chipping in with their two penn'orth ...
JD
Moderator
Main thing is to realise that some of the "definitions" are rubbery and may vary across the Industry. Important point is to check the definitions so that you know what the presumptions are when you use the number.
