Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Falcon 7X, Too easy?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Falcon 7X, Too easy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Aug 2007, 16:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alaska
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Falcon 7X, Too easy?

http://www.ainonline.com/news/single...35/?no_cache=1
According to AIN magazine, the new Falcon has no pilot-controllable trim, no circuit breakers, and the only memory item is to put on the O2 mask in case of fire or depressurization. Is that overkill, or what? Why is so much training required to become a pilot when the airplane won't let you actually do anything? After flying that around for a couple years, what are the odds that the crew will be able to remain upright and fly a succesfull instrument approach on the standby instruments when the computer fails? I think I was born 50 years too late.
Caboclo is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2007, 16:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Where its at
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When the computer fails? Give me a break, you're just as likely to win the lottery.
Caudillo is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2007, 18:26
  #3 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's called the future of all aviation. (Well, sooner or later.)
con-pilot is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2007, 19:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 951
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Right on, Caudillo, you've got it in a nutshe.........................................
............................................................ .............................................
............................................................ ......................................

key got stuck down.
old,not bold is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2007, 21:35
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alaska
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re the TAM flight, while the computers functioned properly, they are still at fault: the pilots were so used to using autobrakes and autospoilers that they forgot they could actuate both manually.
Caboclo is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2007, 23:12
  #6 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look, I'm not saying that I am that happy about all this 'total automation' nonsense. However, it is the way of the future, like enclosed cockpits, instrument flying and Flight Directors.

At least on the 7X the pilot has 360 degrees of roll command. Pitch is limited.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2007, 01:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So you got enough pitch authority to hold the nose up during a slow roll then? Sorry - couldn't help myself.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2007, 13:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 951
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
If not, try reversing the polarity on the FMS power supply while inverted.




Oh OK, I know, I don't really unnerstan these things. I'll get my coat........
old,not bold is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.