Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Falcon 7X, Too easy?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Falcon 7X, Too easy?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th August 2007 | 16:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 151
Likes: 3
From: Alaska
Falcon 7X, Too easy?

http://www.ainonline.com/news/single...35/?no_cache=1
According to AIN magazine, the new Falcon has no pilot-controllable trim, no circuit breakers, and the only memory item is to put on the O2 mask in case of fire or depressurization. Is that overkill, or what? Why is so much training required to become a pilot when the airplane won't let you actually do anything? After flying that around for a couple years, what are the odds that the crew will be able to remain upright and fly a succesfull instrument approach on the standby instruments when the computer fails? I think I was born 50 years too late.
Caboclo is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2007 | 16:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
From: Where its at
When the computer fails? Give me a break, you're just as likely to win the lottery.
Caudillo is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2007 | 18:26
  #3 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 3
From: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
It's called the future of all aviation. (Well, sooner or later.)
con-pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2007 | 19:44
  #4 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 970
Likes: 54
From: uk
Right on, Caudillo, you've got it in a nutshe.........................................
............................................................ .............................................
............................................................ ......................................

key got stuck down.
old,not bold is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2007 | 21:35
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 151
Likes: 3
From: Alaska
Re the TAM flight, while the computers functioned properly, they are still at fault: the pilots were so used to using autobrakes and autospoilers that they forgot they could actuate both manually.
Caboclo is offline  
Reply
Old 8th August 2007 | 23:12
  #6 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 3
From: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Look, I'm not saying that I am that happy about all this 'total automation' nonsense. However, it is the way of the future, like enclosed cockpits, instrument flying and Flight Directors.

At least on the 7X the pilot has 360 degrees of roll command. Pitch is limited.
con-pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2007 | 01:47
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,833
Likes: 2
From: Sale, Australia
So you got enough pitch authority to hold the nose up during a slow roll then? Sorry - couldn't help myself.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Reply
Old 9th August 2007 | 13:51
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 970
Likes: 54
From: uk
If not, try reversing the polarity on the FMS power supply while inverted.




Oh OK, I know, I don't really unnerstan these things. I'll get my coat........
old,not bold is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.