Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Flight director disagree

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Flight director disagree

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jul 2007, 22:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Flight director disagree

I recently saw the FDs of my old Airbus go into totally different modes(ALT*,GS*).I have never seen this before on a bus and there is no warning to tell you it is happening!!Has anybody else seen this on an old bus?
tubby linton is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2007, 00:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No warning?
Hard to believe, but perhaps true.
Now, this happens occasionally on the L1011, but it is clearly noticeable, via the autopilot/flight director mode annunciators.

What you see is what you get, and if it ain't right, recycle mode selections.

Surely Airbus has some similar procedure....
411A is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2007, 07:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Where ever the roster tells me.
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Had it happen in the 320 (sim) the other day.

The FMGC's had dropped to independent mode for some reason.
One went left one went right, quickly changed the AP's over to the side going the correct direction and kept a good eye on it.

In the end was told to pull the cb and reset the fmgc, did the trick and sorted it out.

Don't know if this was just a sim bug or happens in the same way on the a/c.
Polarhero is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2007, 17:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 411
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Don't forget that the FD is only a guidance system and that you should look "through" it, not follow it if it's not giving you what you want. My experience with the airbus is that a reset usually works.
Fly3 is offline  
Old 28th Jul 2007, 20:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In da north country
Age: 62
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've seen it happen on the A-300, the L-1011 and the 747. You do have to use it as a guide, always keep the raw data in the scan as well!
Willit Run is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2007, 06:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In a house
Age: 48
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting.......

Saw a similar thing on one of our shiny new 319's the other day, during the climb out their was a difference in the pitch display between the left and right F/Ds, of at least 3 degrees (reasonably significant at FL360). I have been told that if the other A/P was engaged it would have chased the demand in the pitch of it associated F/D, which might not have been that comfy for the punters.

Is this because each FMGC is working out its own target climb speed, or is the airbus just strange???

electricdeathjet is offline  
Old 31st Jul 2007, 06:58
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@tubby linton

Depending of FMS you have, when on grd go to REF, select A/C sensor status, next, and it will show you any system malfunction of last sectors (up to 6 I guess), maybe.

regards
hetfield is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2007, 18:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: In a house
Age: 48
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hetfield,
......it happened again today!
Where is that ref page that you mentioned? i couldn't find it, is it a part of the atsu/aids page?
Could you give me another clue...
Thanks
electricdeathjet is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2007, 18:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@electricdeathjet

It's funny, cause I have some difficulties to find out which FMS we have installed, but I think it's Honeywell.

It has a button REF....

and so on.

BTW, you can use it inflight as well.
hetfield is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2007, 13:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
I've seen it happen on the A-300, the L-1011 and the 747. You do have to use it as a guide, always keep the raw data in the scan as well!
Easier said than done. Let's face it - your eyes are glued to the FD needles on an ILS and the only way to scan raw data info while locked to the FD, is to have the standby ADI ILS in view during the approach. As far as "looking behind" a FD display at the little aeroplane it hides so successfully, -well that is well nigh impossible less you lose concentration on the FD needles.

You have only to see how poorly some pilots fly raw data non-automatics to see they have been locked on to the comfort of FD's for most of their current flying experience. Meaning they were unable to keep the raw data in the scan.
Centaurus is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2007, 21:20
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sorry for the late reply.The aircraft was set up for an auto land with both ap engaged.GS* was shown on the FO pfd,and ALT* on CPT pfd.Due to the autoland condition AP1 is master so it follows FD1 guidance.FO FD pitch bar shows an increasing pitch down demand.No warnings were triggered by any aircraft system.I ended up throwing it all away and flying a visual approach.
FD1 never captured the GS and remained armed.I was just glad we were not having to do this for a real autoland!
tubby linton is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2007, 08:30
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is good reason for the recommended procedure of not engaging the 2nd AP/FD untill after GS capture.
Clarence Oveur is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2007, 15:47
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The aircraft was in GS* but only one one side!!From memory on the 320 you could get gs in white rather in blue with certain failures.This would mean that it was armed but would not capture!In this case such a subtle failure may have been missed.
tubby linton is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2007, 01:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 411
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Centaurus, your eyes should not be locked on to the flight director bars. Yes you should have them in your scan but you really should be watching the instrument behind them to monitor raw data, not the standby instruments.
Fly3 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.