Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

air law: own sep. + TCAS

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

air law: own sep. + TCAS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jul 2007, 05:53
  #1 (permalink)  
OLG
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Budapest
Age: 53
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
air law: own sep. + TCAS

Dear All, sorry if this is not "tech log" enough, but I hope I have best chance to get some feedback via this part of the forum. Your help is much appreciated!!!

Can anyone please give me the correct reference (ICAO DOC, etc.) where exactly it is defined what horizontal and vertical separation must be maintained while IFR in controlled airspace, if "own separation"?

Also, please give me the correct reference that mandates pilot actions in response of a TCAS RA? Of course I know what to do and why, but which exactly law piece mandates conforming to TCAS RAs?

Luckily this is not for accident investigation but for a paper I have to prepare -- and maybe I'm pedantic, but would like to get the references right.

TIA, OLG
OLG is offline  
Old 25th Jul 2007, 22:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamburg
Age: 46
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear OLG

As far as ICAO rules are concerned, I would answer your question as follows.

If you fly maintaining own separation the blanket clause of ICAO Annex 2, Chapter 3, sec. 3.2.1 applies, which, of course, applies to all flights, controlled or not:
3.2.1 An aircraft shall not be operated in such proximity to other aircraft as to create a collision hazard.
In my opinion there is no ICAO provision that states a specific horizontal separation for the case you asked for. As for vertical separation, you are compelled to maintain the appropriate cruising levels (ICAO Annex 2, Chapter 5, sec. 5.2.2 and 5.3.1).

Concerning TCAS (respectively ACAS in ICAO terminology) there is no ICAO provision that obliges a pilot to follow a RA. There are, however, the provisions for the right-of-way in ICAO Annex 2, Chapter 5, sec. 5.2.2, but the PIC
may depart from these rules in circumstances that render such departure absolutely necessary in the interests of safety (ICAO Annex 2, Chapter 5, sec. 2.3.1).
Needless to say, a RA would be one of these circumstances. ICAO Annex 2, Chapter 3, sec. 3.2.2 clarifies this:
The aircraft that has the right-of-way shall maintain its heading and speed, but nothing in these rules shall relieve the pilot-in-command of an aircraft from the responsibility of taking such action, including collision avoidance manoeuvres based on resolution advisories provided by ACAS equipment, as will best avert collision (ICAO Annex 2, Chapter 3, sec. 3.2.2).
Note that this provision speaks of a 'responsibility'. If the PIC was obliged to follow a RA it would say 'the pilot-in-command shall'.

I hope this will point you in the right direction.

Take care

hvogt

Last edited by hvogt; 15th May 2008 at 16:12.
hvogt is offline  
Old 26th Jul 2007, 03:55
  #3 (permalink)  
OLG
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Budapest
Age: 53
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:)

Dear Heiko,

this is exactly what I needed, thank You very much!

Appreciate Your help, Best Regards, OLG
OLG is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.