Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

3 spool

Old 21st July 2007 | 18:03
  #21 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
Because on many engines the LP stage is JUST the fan i.e. there's a single stage only.
I'm not familiar with any 1- or 2-spool engines that have only the fan on N1. Which engines are so designed?
Intruder is offline  
Reply
Old 21st July 2007 | 18:45
  #22 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 3,038
Likes: 52
From: .
Cool

RB211-524 manual says:

C. The engine is a high by-pass ratio, three-shaft turbofan consisting,
basically, of a gas generator system and a mechanically independent L.P.
system.
D. The gas generator system comprises a seven-stage intermediate pressure
(I.P.) compressor, a six-stage high pressure (H.P.) compressor, an
annular combustion section and single-stage I.P. and H.P. turbines.
E. The L.P. system consists of a single-stage compressor (fan) driven by a
three-stage turbine.

The CF6-50 engine is a dual-rotor, axial-flow, gas turbine turbofan.
Basic design is based on a high compression, high bypass ratio concept.

B. An integrated, 4-stage, front fan and low pressure compressor is
driven by a 4-stage low pressure turbine which combines to form the N1
rotor.

The 14-stage high pressure compressor is driven by a 2-stage
high pressure turbine which combines to form the N2 rotor. Each rotor
is mechanically independent of the other.
spannersatcx is offline  
Reply
Old 21st July 2007 | 19:12
  #23 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 6
From: La Belle Province
@Intruder. I was thinking 3 spool. I can't think of any where the LP has anything except the fan.

Obviously a single spool engine would be unlikely to have just a fan stage (unless it was a centrifugal single stage, perhaps, and we hardly can call that a "fan"
Mad (Flt) Scientist is online now  
Reply
Old 21st July 2007 | 19:15
  #24 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
I'm not familiar with any 1- or 2-spool engines that have only the fan on N1. Which engines are so designed?
The military TF34 is one, and the early CF34's too: Single-stage fan driven by a 4-stage LP turbine, and a 14-stage HP compressor and 2-stage HP turbine core. Said core is a scaled-up version of the T64 helo & turboprop engine.

Note the CF34-8 & -10 are altogether different in layout from these original engines.

I'm not aware of any single-spool engines with a fan, which would amount to in effect a "leaky" stage 1 of the compressor.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st July 2007 | 20:19
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 1
From: AEP
Single spool engines, with a fan... (aft fan in these cases) -
GE's CF-700 (aft fan version of the CJ-610/J-85) and
CJ-805-23 (on the CV 990) -
xxx
Strange, that in the case of CJ-805-23, GE kept the "CJ" designation.
xxx
Was the RR Conway R.Co 12 a single or twin spool...?
Had a fan, for its bypass but... cannot recall.
xxx

Happy contrails
BelArgUSA is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd July 2007 | 00:29
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
The RR Conway was 2-spool.
411A is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd July 2007 | 00:59
  #27 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,204
Likes: 2
From: Seattle
The military TF34 is one, and the early CF34's too: Single-stage fan driven by a 4-stage LP turbine, and a 14-stage HP compressor and 2-stage HP turbine core. Said core is a scaled-up version of the T64 helo & turboprop engine.
That makes sense -- evolving a free-turbine turboshaft or turboprop to a fan on the LP stage. Thanks.
Intruder is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd July 2007 | 02:16
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: malaysia
the origin of the N in N1,N2, why not R1,R2 ?

Thanks guys. Just curious if anyone know the history of the word N?Mathematical terms & percentage!!
rockytan is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd July 2007 | 03:17
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 1
From: AEP
Maybe...
xxx
I remember my classes of math and physics, which were in French language, we used the value "n" as a designated or arbitrary amount. While in the Anglo-Saxon world, people will state "I owe you "x" number of dollars", a French language mathematician or physicist would say "I owe you "n" number of dollars"... maybe in an English language math of physics classroom lecture, the "n" is used as well as the French do, to designate a "number"...
xxx
With jet engines, the 100% "N" value is rather arbitrary. Some engine manufacturers might decide to call the maximum rated RPM as 100%, while others will decide the maximum RPM as 98.5% or 101.2%... then like the examples for N1, N2 and N3 (of the RB211) given in previous postings, but might not be the maximum or continuous RPM values...
xxx
We are all familiar with engine stations designations, such as "Pt-2" or "Tt-7" as pressure or temperature values for various "stations" from inlet to exhaust of engines, "N" is another conventional engineering value, expressing RPM...
xxx
This is my interpretation of what "N" means. On the J-85, the RPM indicator was simply called RPM, not "N1", as there was only one shaft. Since I made a major clean-up of my old manuals, for "paper recycling" some years ago, no idea as to where or what publication I can refer to.
xxx

Happy contrails
BelArgUSA is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd July 2007 | 06:18
  #30 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
From: Sydney,NSW,Australia
On the CJ 805-3B (or the Mil. J79) CV 880 engine, max N1 was 103% rpm and 1% eng variation equaled 5% thrust variation.
HotDog is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd July 2007 | 13:41
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
That brings to mind what is the relationship of "redline" N value to the 100% value quoted by the manufacturer?

PS just a brain teaser
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd July 2007 | 21:02
  #32 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 38
From: Long ago and far away ......
Another advantage for the 3-spool that I don't think I have seen here yet:

3 spools allows the engine to be smaller in cross-section because there is an extra spool developing some of the power. This reduces some of the overall drag and could also be a positive where, for example, an aircraft design requires more clearance from the ground when 'hanging an engine under the wing. On the BA 777s a RR Trent 800 has 2 feet less diameter on the engine casing than a GE 90.
MrBernoulli is offline  
Reply
Old 8th June 2022 | 22:40
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: malaysia
Thanks guys
rockytan is offline  
Reply
Old 9th June 2022 | 12:42
  #34 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 301
Likes: 11
From: Netherlands
In my university, N was short for Number of rotations of the spools, N therefore.
washoutt is offline  
Reply
Old 9th June 2022 | 13:49
  #35 (permalink)  
Community Builder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 17,731
Likes: 2,105
From: Reading, UK
Originally Posted by rockytan
Thanks guys
Some of them may even be still alive.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Reply
Old 9th June 2022 | 15:55
  #36 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 236
Likes: 146
From: Uk
Haha! rockytan, that's gotta be a record.... 15 years from response to acknowledgement..... You don't work for the CAA by any chance do you?
sorvad is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.