Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Estimated Position Error.....

Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Estimated Position Error.....

Old 23rd Jun 2007, 13:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 'tween posts
Posts: 195
Estimated Position Error.....

Hello every one ,
Reading my books on navigation and trying to figure out how did they (whoever they are) arrive at a figure of 0.28nm as a threshold for estimate position error ???
can anyone help?
thanks,

Last edited by gearpins; 23rd Jun 2007 at 13:31.
gearpins is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2007, 05:41
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 'tween posts
Posts: 195
standing by

anyone please?
gearpins is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2007, 06:02
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 13,629
You aren't giving us much to work on!

In what circumstances does the author of the book give the value? Position measured how? - DR?/RNAV?/INS?, how long into flight?, etc.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2007, 12:19
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 'tween posts
Posts: 195
sorry about that

OK here is an extract from FCOM A320

CURRENT NAV MODE
EPE (RATE or THRESHOLD)
REMARK


IRS/GPS

(FOM˛ + 100˛) in meters

FOM = Figure of Merit of GPS
If above 0.28 NM the GPS position is rejected.


IRS/DME/DME

Tends towards 0.28 NM

EPE decreases from initial value to 0.28 Nm.


IRS/VOR/DME

0.1 NM + 0.05 X DME DIST minimum : 0.28 NM

EPE increases or decreases as the distance between the a/c and the VOR/DME.


IRS ONLY

+ 8 NM/h for the first 21 min.
+ 2 NM/h after

EPE increases continuously




sorry once again for the lack of clarity before
gearpins is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2007, 13:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 13,629
Is that not saying that if the error is greater than 0.28nm it rejects it, it doesn't look like a statement of error calculation to me.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2007, 14:49
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 50
Posts: 1,609
Looks like Airbus don't want an epe less than .28 uless GPS is valid and used.

May well have something to do with the implamentation of RNP when the system was designed. As RNP approaches at one time also specified the nav mode eg. RNAV(GNSS)

B-RNAV = RNP 5
P-RNAV = RNP 1

Default Approach value on our brazilian/honeywell equipment is RNP.3

As RNP is stll evolving I woudn't spend too much time worrying as by the time you've figured it out the game may have changed.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2007, 22:00
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 'tween posts
Posts: 195
just wondering..

All I am trying to do is figure why is the value 0.28?? and not say 2 or some other convenient number. I am sure its for a good reason. just trying to get to the history behind it...
Any Navigation guru out there..??
gearpins is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2007, 10:04
  #8 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting home
Age: 41
Posts: 2,566
I think you misinterpret the information given. On the very next FCOM page, there is some explanatory text and regulatory requirements to which the aircraft had been certified.

ENR 2 NM, Terminal 1 NM and APCH 0,5 NM (0,3 with GPS).

Aircraft itself estimates the probable positon error (based on available data sources and time from initialization / last update). This EPE value is evaluated against the certification requirements and pilot is warned whenever accuracy limit is not satisfied.

What you quote is a very in-depth knowledge on how exactly is the EPE calculated.

For instance the IRS mode with DME/DME updating the EPE may be as low as 0,28 NM. Essentially the manufacturer states that 0,28 NM is the best achievable precision in IRS/DME/DME mode. Why not 2 NM? Beacuse their equipment is much better than that. Why not 0,1 NM? I bet they wish but IRS/DME/DME installation just cannot do it.
FlightDetent is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2007, 02:10
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 'tween posts
Posts: 195
flt detent, thanks, that cleared it up a bit for me.
I was wondering if .28 nm was also a regulatory requirement?
gearpins is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.