Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

apu on a 767

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

apu on a 767

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st May 2007, 05:53
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
apu on a 767

Hi,
By no means an expert on the 767 or any big iron for that matter (a mere PPL), still a quick question regarding the APU if I may...

initially you'll turn it on, start up the engines then turn it off.
What I'm not clear about is when should one turn it on again? (somehow 10K comes to mind, but I'm not sure where I got that number from)

Thanks!
errata is offline  
Old 31st May 2007, 07:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Under the sea
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends...

Generally these days it will be after landing as you taxi in. Unless its CAT III; then 10 000'.
extreme P is offline  
Old 31st May 2007, 08:12
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks!!
That's to serve as a backup in case of a R/L bus failure, I assume
errata is offline  
Old 31st May 2007, 09:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Surrounding the localizer
Posts: 2,200
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
usually...I try to have the run light illuminate.......just as you set the park brake
haughtney1 is offline  
Old 31st May 2007, 09:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Generally these days it will be after landing as you taxi in. Unless its CAT III; then 10 000'.
APU v CAT 3 must be airline specific - never done it in BA... Some now start APU ASAP after Landing to allow 1 engine to be shutdown... assuming of course the APU works
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 31st May 2007, 16:23
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any reason for not turning it on in the air (with the CAT 3 exception)?

There are possible advantages - so why not?
errata is offline  
Old 31st May 2007, 16:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Under the sea
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing says the easiest way to save gas is to turn the APU off.

What are the advantages of having the APU on while airborne (assuming of course a "normal" airplane)?
extreme P is offline  
Old 31st May 2007, 16:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any reason for not turning it on in the air (with the CAT 3 exception)?
There are possible advantages - so why not?
Errrr ... wastes fuel, wears out, might catch fire... I am not sure what the "advantages" are?
On a CAT 3, or other approach, I presume it is running in case of a generator failure? If so, I would be surprised if the transfer to APU would be "seamless", and might be enough to trip off enough systems to cause you to GA anyway?
I flew one type, albeit not airliner, where the APU had successfully been used for years on the ground. The moment is started being used airborne, or rather during landings, it experienced a high failure rate
NigelOnDraft is offline  
Old 31st May 2007, 16:46
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Advantages?
err..extra redundancy in case of a Gen/bus failure, or is it a bad tradeoff?
errata is offline  
Old 31st May 2007, 16:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Under the sea
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since a generator failure is a non event why run the APU and burn fuel at near record prices for a "just in case"?
extreme P is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2007, 03:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
With the loss of a generator on a CAT 3 approach on the 75/6 you will lose your fail operational capability (unless it happens below AH) and may have to go around unless it happens early enough in the approach to rebrief for a DA versus an AH.

(Decision altitude versus alert height)

Having the APU up and running will normally provide for a no break seamless transition of electrical power and will allow you to continue using the same minima.(You still have 2 generators)


A big plus on low vis approaches and it is standard procedure at my airline to start the APU on the approach checklist. 10000 feet seems premature.
This is only on low vis approaches though, otherwise we just start it up after landing.
stilton is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2007, 06:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Oz
Posts: 310
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Some permissible unserviceabilities (MELs) require the APU to be running if operating an ETOPS sector (again rules are country specific).

SOPs also vary from airline to airline as far as when to start it if conducting Cat II/III ILS approaches (varies from 5000' to 20000' in my experience).

Boeing state that APU in-flight starts may not be successful if the aircraft is above 35000'.
esreverlluf is online now  
Old 1st Jun 2007, 08:23
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our airline just recently instituted a procedure on both 757 and 767 whereby we are required to let the APU run for 10 minutes prior to introducing a pneumatic load (pack or packs). This on an APU design that has been around for a long as some of our junior pilots. If temps are at either extreme (warm or cold), most crews are not complying (our airline will not connect “conditioned” air).

Any other carrier establish this procedure?....Background?
Shore Guy is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2007, 21:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Ten minutes does seem excessive, I think one minute is adequate.

We actually have no guidance on the subject.

Used to be one minute for electrical load and three for pneumatic on the 727!
stilton is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2007, 23:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Northport, NW England
Age: 44
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shore Guy: No such limits at my company.

Only the stipulation that when you've had the packs running before selecting them off for the engine start one must close the APU bleed valve before selecting packs off - then select the APU bleed back on.

We've had a number of uncommanded shutdowns using the "normal" just packs-off routine.

Regards EGT: In our latest "Best practice" APU usage guidance whilst on the ground on stand without Ground power available we are to run the APU with the Bleed valve off as this results in the lowest EGT.
World of Tweed is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.