Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Why no de-icing equipment on the tail?

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Why no de-icing equipment on the tail?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd May 2007, 15:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: london uk
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why no de-icing equipment on the tail?

My friend mentioned to me that the 737's he flies dont have any anti/de-ice systems for the tail plane or fin! Obviously in a decent through heavy calg you would expect to see a build up on an unprotected surface. So, why no anti/de-ice systems there??
pistongone is offline  
Old 2nd May 2007, 15:35
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Newcastle, WA, USA
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You won't find h. tail or v. tail anti-ice on all current (and most past) Airbus and Boeing airplanes.

The OEMs demonstrate acceptable stability and control with 3" artificial ice shapes on all unprotected wing and tail leading edges as part of the basic certification process. The results are confirmed by at least one natural icing test.
Old Aero Guy is offline  
Old 3rd May 2007, 02:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep.

The only reason anyone deices the wing is that the performance penalty for not doing so outweighs the cost/complexity of the system. The balance is USUALLY the other way around for a tailplane, so no-one bothers.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 3rd May 2007, 14:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: right here
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and since the ice build-up (and the profiles of h. and v. stab) are symetrical... not much worry.
FCS Explorer is offline  
Old 3rd May 2007, 20:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 2,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even if the tail sections are symmetrical (and not all are) the ice buildup, on the horizontal tail anyway, won't be, because the flow won't be symmetrical.

I'm also reminded that some aircraft do have tail de-icing. SJ30-2 being one example...one can only assume that for those cases, the benefit in, say, usable cg range outweighs the cost of installing the system.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Old 4th May 2007, 13:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: West
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I'm also reminded that some aircraft do have tail de-icing. SJ30-2 being one example"
The MD-80 series being another.
None is offline  
Old 5th May 2007, 11:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Age: 49
Posts: 52
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to fly Fairchild metro, that did have de-ice boots on the tail, and I believe they were certainly needed - I believe a tail plane stall in icing conditions was a serious threat having heard of a crew who had to deal with one....
Not sure as to why some types would be more suseptible to aerodynamic problems on the tail in icing than others?
JOSHUA is offline  
Old 5th May 2007, 11:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The DC-8 has a tail de ice system
GlueBall is offline  
Old 5th May 2007, 15:05
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The B707 also has tail anti-icing fitted.

The primary reason newer designs (including the L1011) have no tail surface anti-icing is because the stabilizer has a large angle of movement due to trim requirements...or, in the case of the TriStar, pitch control.
The older jet transports with tail anti-icing had it fitted for a reason...it was assumed it was necessary due to prior experience with piston powered types.
411A is offline  
Old 5th May 2007, 15:33
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From my experience, I can tell you that we've landed after a number of moderate rime encounters and the tail was clean.
flyboyike is offline  
Old 5th May 2007, 15:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EMB145 has tail & stab de-icing. Needs it too.
fatboy slim is offline  
Old 7th May 2007, 20:20
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dubai
Age: 56
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Saw a rather scary video of flight ice trials carried out on the J41 by BAe. Was after the Roslawn ATR prang. Also ATR had another prang due to full flap and tail plane icing, thing that was in Italy?

BAe did loads of work on tail plane icing. Know the ended up changing the elevator profile and leading edge design on the J41.

Anybody that was at BAe at the time for comment?
Avi8tor is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.