Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Propeller theory

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Propeller theory

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Apr 2007, 23:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: seat 0A
Age: 41
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Propeller theory

Why is it that the propellers on piston engined aircraft are in fine pitch for start up and shut down, while turboprops are feathered?

Al
ATP_Al is offline  
Old 22nd Apr 2007, 23:39
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only a few turboprops have the propellor feathered during start.
PT-6's mostly.
Others (AeroProducts/Hamilton Standard on the Electra, Garrett TPE331's, RR Dart (superb, by the way) engines, have the prop near the ground fine pitch setting, as an aid to starting.
The devil is in the details.
411A is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2007, 00:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The devil is in the details.
411A is right, and Here's a discussion of some of the details.

PT6, PW100, CT7, CT64 turboprops are all twin-spool and thus normally feathered when shut down.

Last edited by barit1; 23rd Apr 2007 at 01:50.
barit1 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2007, 14:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, most single-spool (or "direct drive") installations require some sort of pitch lock to keep the blades in fine pitch when you shut down. Not sure about others but the Garrett TPE331 simply has centrifugal pins that engage as the prop spins down on shutdown.
I am sure the RR Dart has some complex sequence of microswitches and pins or something!
Castle Don is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2007, 15:18
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bonny Scotland
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
don't think the PT6 is a twin spool. it is a single spool with a free turbine.

the free turbine is what drives the gearbox and prop which are not mechanically connected to the spool, hence the term free turbine.

because the gearbox and prop are not connected to the spool, when you turn over a PT6 to start it, the starter generator only has to turn the spool which is also known as the gas generator, and not the spool, gearbox and prop so the prop can remain feathered without putting any strain on the starter generator.

StraightLevel
StraightLevel is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2007, 16:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PT6 IS twin spool, however the two are not coaxial as are most twin spools.

The T58 (helo engine and its R-R Gnome twin) are likewise.
barit1 is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2007, 20:21
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bonny Scotland
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the pt6-112a is certainly not twin spool, it's a single spool with a free turbine to turn the prop, but i do know that there are many other different pt6's, of which i know nothing about.

StraightLevel
StraightLevel is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2007, 22:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Terminology

I think everyone is getting mixed up on terminology here .......but a free turbine configuration IS a twin spool...they are one and the same.

I think some confusion has arisen due to the somewhat unusual arrangement of the 2 spools in the PT6. But, just because they are not coaxial doesn't change the fact that there are still two non-mechanically connected shafts (spools)....a core(or gas generator) and a power turbine.
Castle Don is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2007, 08:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bonny Scotland
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we were taught for our atpl's that the definition of a spool is a compressor, a shaft, and a turbine combined. anything less is not a spool.

will need to check my notes when i get a chance.

straightlevel
StraightLevel is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2007, 08:48
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bonny Scotland
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
have just noticed that you guys are all from america.

perhaps the faa definition of a spool is different to jaa?

straightlevel
StraightLevel is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2007, 12:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we were taught for our atpl's that the definition of a spool is a compressor, a shaft, and a turbine combined. anything less is not a spool.
SL's reference is a rather narrow definition - valid for turbojets & turbofans.
But in the rest of the world a free turbine engine (i.e. separate power turbine, with only aerodynamic coupling to the core) is called twin spool, whether coaxial shafting or not.
(Were I of a combative bent, I'd point out that a propeller is really an unducted single-stage compressor rotor, and thus the free turbine+shaft+gearbox+prop of a PT6 constitute a "spool" per his definition.
But I won't press that point... )
barit1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.