Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Aircraft life


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Aircraft life

Old 20th March 2007 | 08:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Aircraft life

Does anyone know how many flights an aircraft (B777) is designed to fly during its life?
eight is offline  
Reply
Old 20th March 2007 | 10:53
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
I haven't found anything completely conclusive but 75000 pressurisation cycles seems to be the average. Can anyone confirm this?
eight is offline  
Reply
Old 20th March 2007 | 19:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Malta
Not an answer to your question exactly, but the first 777 is being presently scrapped in Brasil. It's an ex BA machine which was on lease to Varig.
Jetset320 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th March 2007 | 20:56
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
Remember that aircraft on short-haul routes accumulate more cycles but fewer hours, in general, in their lifetime.

And in wear and tear, cycles count more than hours.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 20th March 2007 | 21:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: 39N 77W
Short-haul planes are designed for more cycles than long-haul planes.

A turboprop and not pressurized, but Winair retired a DHC Twin Otter after approximately 131,000 cycles. Winair's typical flight duration is about 15-20 minutes.

Isn't some passenger jet up to about half that number? Major, major work can extend life in some cases.
seacue is offline  
Reply
Old 21st March 2007 | 00:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
From: fairly close to the colonial capitol
The Boeing 777 has a DSO (design service objective) of 40,000 cycles.

However, the 777 has an in-service test fatigue cycle rating of 120,000 when using modified maintenance procedures designed for extended use.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st March 2007 | 01:41
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
The 732 in the 1988 Aloha accident had 89,680 cycles. At the time, it was the second-highest-cycle 737 in the world.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 21st March 2007 | 12:37
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Thanks for the replies.
eight is offline  
Reply
Old 21st March 2007 | 13:54
  #9 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 192
Likes: 23
From: Albuquerque USA
design life objectives by model from a Boeing document

This posted Boeing document is on corrosion, but asserts that the general design objective is 20 years service life--implying that the cycle objective is derived from that via assumptions regarding route structure and utilization.

It gives design cycle and flight hour objectives by model for many Boeing and (former) Douglas jet transport designs, with the cycle objective ranging from a low of 20,000 for the 707, 747, and MD-11 to a high of 60,000 for the MD-90.

It also observes that many flying aircraft have exceeded their service design life objectives.
service life table
archae86 is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd March 2007 | 11:53
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Thanks for that link, it confirms data I found elsewhere. Very helpful, especially as it is a Boeing source.
eight is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd March 2007 | 13:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
It's interesting to note from the Boeing table that the DC9 is "King of the hill", far above the rest, with the B727 not a bad second place holder.

The highest time DC9 has exceeded 120,000 hours at last count, possibly somewhat higher by now.

It was said to me my a Douglas sales rep at the time of a contemplated purchase, that the worst favour Douglas ever did for themselves was to build such long life aircraft. Better to follow the Boeing "trash 'em and buy a new one" policy.

Now that the DC9 family flies under the Boeing flag as the B717, I privately wonder (cynically) what Boeing have done to reduce the B717 life cycle.

Regards,

Old Smokey (who flew a lot of DC9s, but now puts his butt and trust in Boeing)
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.