Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Gain Programming

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Gain Programming

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Mar 2007, 10:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 234
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gain Programming

What Is The Autopilot Gain Programming ?
graziani is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2007, 11:55
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Home
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gain Scheduling

The shaping or programming of certain gains to compensate for varying conditions, such as airspeed, beam convergence, etc.

As an example in the autopilot when you capture the glideslope and move closer to the centre of the beam gain scheduling is automatically provided by radio altitude input to compensate for glideslope radio beam convergence. i.e. When the aircraft is further away from the beam centre it needs a larger signal to reposition towards the centre of the beam. However when close to the beam centre smaller responses are needed and this is acheived by reducing the gain of the signal or to dampen the effect of the signal variation.

An analogy would be taking a shower when you first turn it on you will need to adjust the temperature control with large movements to get the approximate temperature(otherwise you will be burnt or very cold ). Then only small adjustments are needed to obtain the required temperature. Your body senses the change and your hand movement provides the automatic gain programming
Engineer is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2007, 11:59
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 234
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks very much...I appreciate
graziani is offline  
Old 10th Mar 2007, 15:53
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Home
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If we are talking about roll input:

then during the descent along the glide slope beam, as the ILS transmitter is neared, since the beam-error radio signal is a function of angular beam errors, a significant increase results in the sensitivity of the input beam-error radio signal to movement of the airplane relative to the beam centre.

That is, because the radio measures angular beam errors rather than actual linear distances, as the transmitter is neared, a small airplane movement off the beam centre results in a proportionately large angular beam error.
A correspondingly large radio beam-error signal would result, causing overcontrol. To correct for this condition, a desensitiser network is included.

This network receives an input from the radio altimeter which is applied to a function generator. When the altitude of the airplane drops below 1000 feet, the output of the function generator changes the gain of the desensitiser circuit, which provides initial amplification of the beam-error signal for initial very tight control.

The descent of the airplane down the glide slope beam towards the transmitter is directly proportional to the radio altitude as the airplane approaches the localizer transmitter. Therefore, the function generator controls the desensitiser circuit to reduce the gain of the beam-error signal in proportion to the increase in sensitivity of this signal, thus preventing overcontrol to small linear beam displacements.

Another function generator is included in the final bank-angle limiter. This function generator goes into operation at an altitude of approximately 1000 feet and reduces the bank-angle limit as the airplane approaches touchdown. The bank-angle limit is reduced to a maximum of 5 degrees, as touchdown is neared. This prevents excessive bank angles as touchdown is approached.
Engineer is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2007, 19:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Auto Land

I believe it's also the reason you cant do an auto land AND auto touchdown on some runways due to undulating terrain on short final that confuses the "gain programing" from the Rad Alt reference to glideslope & pitch.
I believe a certain runway in Jo'burg is mentioned in the limits section.
mutley320 is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2007, 19:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry.

Sorry, Talking about Airbus 320 limits/ OEB. But otherwise relevant i believe.
mutley320 is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2007, 11:15
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 234
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IN SUPPLEMENTARY CHAPTER BOEING 737 .........


note.DO NOT USE VOR/LOC AFDS mode when conducting VOR approaches if the VOR/DME statin elevation is more than 5000 ft MSL , if there is no co-located DME trasmitter available at the VOR station to be used or when the DME is invalid for any other reason.........


WHY ???
SOMEONE CAN EXPLAIN TO ME
PLEASE
THANKS
graziani is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.