Which is more economical in the long run
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which is more economical in the long run
Is it more efficient and economical to have a company policy --
1) Where the flex takeoff is used anytime conditions allow using a full length runway
or
2) Is it better to not have such a policy where pilots can accept intersection departures without using a flex takeoff.
1) Where the flex takeoff is used anytime conditions allow using a full length runway
or
2) Is it better to not have such a policy where pilots can accept intersection departures without using a flex takeoff.
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Full-rated takeoffs ultimately cost more because of the longterm effects of deterioration in SFC and EGT/ITT margin. The sole driver for flex takeoff is economics (keeping engines healthy longer).
About the only time I can see a voluntary full-rated intersection takeoff making sense is to make up schedule time vs. missing an arrival gate.
About the only time I can see a voluntary full-rated intersection takeoff making sense is to make up schedule time vs. missing an arrival gate.
