Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

TOGA time limit (JAR vs FAR)


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

TOGA time limit (JAR vs FAR)

Old 13th February 2007 | 17:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Madrid
TOGA time limit (JAR vs FAR)

According JAR, TOGA is certified for use for a maximum of 10 minutes in case of an engine failure at take off. On the other hand ,and as far as I know, FAR only allows 5 minutes in the same scenario.
So, for the same enviromental conditions and aircraft/engine type, the [U]Obstacle Limited TO Mass might be different (higher)for the company operating according JAR than for the one complying with FAR.
I donīt believe this could really happens, it might be a great disadvantage for americans.
Can anybody out there explain me that?

Thank you in advance.
alatriste is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2007 | 18:36
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,581
Likes: 0
From: flyover country USA
It IS a disadvantage for American operators when there are remote obstacles to clear OEI, thus RTOW limited. However on modern engines there is really no basis in technical fact for the 5-min. limit.

I used to do test cell runs in which we repeatedly held rated TO power longer than 10 minutes, and while I can't say it was good for long-term retention of EGT margin or SFC, there was NEVER any reliability issue.

Thus - the beancounters are not delighted by the prospect of early removal of a performance-limited donk for seal refurbishment, but flight crews of a modern engine should not hesitate to use TOGA as required.
barit1 is offline  
Reply
Old 13th February 2007 | 22:50
  #3 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,447
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
Basically dollars .. you buy the AFM supplement from the OEM and away you go with 10 minutes.
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply
Old 14th February 2007 | 04:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Yup, that's the regulations. If you really need the extra 5 minutes, USE IT without fear of failure, just don't PLAN to do so!

Regards,

Old Smokey
Old Smokey is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2007 | 13:37
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Does not matter
N registered aircraft operating in Europe under JAR's... Do they have to buy the "10 min" also?

Any US airline that you know of using the 10 min limit?

Any idea how much $ switching over to the 10min limit can cost?

Tks.
manuel ortiz is offline  
Reply
Old 15th February 2007 | 20:11
  #6 (permalink)  
Fleet Manager
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,447
Likes: 310
From: various places .....
cost ?

Can be significant .. put it this way, some years ago we were looking at the problem with a twin jet. In the end we convinced the local regulator that we could do a local flight manual amendment to "permit" the use of 10 minutes without taking any credit for the extra performance ... got us around our particular problems at next to no cost. I can't remember the OEM cost but it was in the many thousands ...
john_tullamarine is offline  
Reply
Old 16th February 2007 | 03:23
  #7 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 25
From: ME
According JAR, TOGA is certified for use for a maximum of 10 minutes in case of an engine failure at take off. On the other hand ,and as far as I know, FAR only allows 5 minutes in the same scenario.
Not totally correct, FAA permits 10 minutes in the same scenario. Manufacturers offer it either as standard (Embraer) or at a cost (Boeing/Douglas), although if its new aircraft purchase, this additional cost usually doesnt apply. We operate 5 aircraft types under FAR121 with 10 minutes.


Mutt
mutt is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.