Practical uses for CWS
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Practical uses for CWS
I'm currently studying Autoflight and have come across CWS (Control Wheel Steering). On a standard flight from A to B when and why would it be used?
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: fl345
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
control wheel steering is the general mode of manual flying in the airbus
fly by wire family series as in the A300 its a choice..... im not sure if other
aircraft models are the same....
fly by wire family series as in the A300 its a choice..... im not sure if other
aircraft models are the same....
control wheel steering is the general mode of manual flying in the airbus fly by wire family series
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: orbital
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Normally never used.
Only conceivable uses:-
1. In turbulence mode, A/P reverts to CWS.
2. To increase bank angle in a hold when command mode doesn't give enough.
3. To increase pitch angle when command mode in V/S max cannot contain the airspeed.
It just provides stabilisation to manual flight. Same as airbus in 'manual'.
Only conceivable uses:-
1. In turbulence mode, A/P reverts to CWS.
2. To increase bank angle in a hold when command mode doesn't give enough.
3. To increase pitch angle when command mode in V/S max cannot contain the airspeed.
It just provides stabilisation to manual flight. Same as airbus in 'manual'.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some of our 747-200s are equipped with CWS. I've tried it a few times just to see what it could do. I was not impressed. There was a significant perceivable lag in control response, compared with manual flight. If the airplane trims up well, there is little use for CWS.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northern Lights
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2 good uses for CWS,
in turbulance,
and for unrealible airspeed and/or altitude situations.
CWS and be used in the pitch mode or the hold mode or in both pitch and roll modes together.
Its a great thing, there to be used, if the situation warrents it.
in turbulance,
and for unrealible airspeed and/or altitude situations.
CWS and be used in the pitch mode or the hold mode or in both pitch and roll modes together.
Its a great thing, there to be used, if the situation warrents it.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: right here
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no use! (after 5 years boeing)
only thing i like to do: off-set non-prec app using LNAV-VNAV:
disengage LNAV -> a/p reverts to CWS-roll: line up with centerline and keep vnav-FD-bar for vertical guidance.
but as i said: use of CWS is VERY limited.
only thing i like to do: off-set non-prec app using LNAV-VNAV:
disengage LNAV -> a/p reverts to CWS-roll: line up with centerline and keep vnav-FD-bar for vertical guidance.
but as i said: use of CWS is VERY limited.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CWS.
Useful in the L1011.
On all L10 aircraft (except those that were on the British register, or those that were used by GF) CWS can be selected on the ground, and is useful for low level turns immediately after takeoff, where maximum allowed bank angle is desired, due to noise abatement procedures, or obstacles in the takeoff flight path.
Very smooth operation on the 'ole Lockheed tri-motor.
Useful in the L1011.
On all L10 aircraft (except those that were on the British register, or those that were used by GF) CWS can be selected on the ground, and is useful for low level turns immediately after takeoff, where maximum allowed bank angle is desired, due to noise abatement procedures, or obstacles in the takeoff flight path.
Very smooth operation on the 'ole Lockheed tri-motor.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ummm....some rather interesting and wrong statements being made here!
airbond is on the money...
Boeings' recommended autopilot mode in severe turbulence is CWS when installed.
If you understood how it works compared to the autopilot, you would understand Boeings' FCTM statement.
...maybe get the books out guys and read a bit!
airbond is on the money...
Boeings' recommended autopilot mode in severe turbulence is CWS when installed.
If you understood how it works compared to the autopilot, you would understand Boeings' FCTM statement.
...maybe get the books out guys and read a bit!
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For what airplane is that "Boeing" recommendation? In what document?
How many of us have ever flown in severe turbulence? I haven't. I suspect more THINK they have, than actually have done so... Also, in 8+ years in the 747, I have had to disconnect the autopilot only once because it could not hold attitude in [moderate] turbulence.
How many of us have ever flown in severe turbulence? I haven't. I suspect more THINK they have, than actually have done so... Also, in 8+ years in the 747, I have had to disconnect the autopilot only once because it could not hold attitude in [moderate] turbulence.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For what airplane is that "Boeing" recommendation? In what document?
Direct quote from the FCTM - Flight Crew Training Manual.
I have had to disconnect the autopilot only once because it could not hold attitude in [moderate] turbulence
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B757 & B767 and as far as I am aware, all Boeing types that have CWS installed.
146
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Grand Com f'Ort
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I use it on the B737-NG for various purposes, often transitioning from raw data hand-flown to automatic flight, it allows me to select an autopilot and then programme the FDs (I could, of course, ask my co-pilot for the selections, but it's just a simple to do it oneself). Also, if hand-flying and needing a moment to check a chart, for example, or for flying visual circuits or circling approaches.
On light twins with more basic autopilots and flight directors, it's more useful, and has many purposes, but I guess the original question refers to 'heavy' aircraft.
On light twins with more basic autopilots and flight directors, it's more useful, and has many purposes, but I guess the original question refers to 'heavy' aircraft.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NYC
Age: 36
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi all,
I've been told that if you hold the yoke in a position for more than 2 seconds, CWS will switch in and automatically override the A/P until you disengage it.
Also, I know of specific CWS switches on the 73NG MCP, but how do you select it on the 744?
Brian
I've been told that if you hold the yoke in a position for more than 2 seconds, CWS will switch in and automatically override the A/P until you disengage it.
Also, I know of specific CWS switches on the 73NG MCP, but how do you select it on the 744?
Brian
Useful in airliner-derivatives with split-axis autopilots during military AAR operations as it allows full manual control of the angle of bank and roll rate during turns on the AARA.
But more modern aircraft have smoother AFS response in HDG mode, so that is used by some operators - NAV mode giving little warning of the onset of a turn.
The A330MRTT may have a modified HDG mode to reduce rate of change of bank angle when entering the turn, approaching the desired bank angle, rolling out of the turn and approaching wings level again. This is intended to make the task of receiver pilots easier when remaining in contact on wing hoses in the turn.
In the VC10 tanker, we had the 'MAN' mode for the autopilot turn rate, this ensured that the pilot had direct control of the bank angle. But this feature wasn't fitted to later generation airliners - it being assumed that HDG or NAV would be sufficient.
But more modern aircraft have smoother AFS response in HDG mode, so that is used by some operators - NAV mode giving little warning of the onset of a turn.
The A330MRTT may have a modified HDG mode to reduce rate of change of bank angle when entering the turn, approaching the desired bank angle, rolling out of the turn and approaching wings level again. This is intended to make the task of receiver pilots easier when remaining in contact on wing hoses in the turn.
In the VC10 tanker, we had the 'MAN' mode for the autopilot turn rate, this ensured that the pilot had direct control of the bank angle. But this feature wasn't fitted to later generation airliners - it being assumed that HDG or NAV would be sufficient.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CWS had it's uses in earlier generation aircraft such as the A300-B4, which did not have a Mach Hold. CWS was useful to periodically adjust pitch attitude to maintain the desired Mach Number.
Other than that, on more modern types with almost every mode controllable through a basic or more advanced mode, I can't think of much use for it. If I had it, (maybe I do) I doubt that I could think of much practical application for it.
Useful in it's time, a bit out-moded now
Regards,
Old Smokey
Other than that, on more modern types with almost every mode controllable through a basic or more advanced mode, I can't think of much use for it. If I had it, (maybe I do) I doubt that I could think of much practical application for it.
Useful in it's time, a bit out-moded now
Regards,
Old Smokey
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The B744 doesn't have CWS, neither do most 757/767 (it used to be a company option). Don't know about the 777 or the 717 but doubt it. So the only "modern" Boeing that has CWS is the 737. There you can override the AP and force it into CWS P or CWS R by applying a specific force to the control wheel. That way you can have the AP keep altitude and have manual control the roll axis (or vice versa).
Note, the B744 and the B757/767's with updated MCP's and AP's will hold current ATTitude if the AP is engaged with no F/D mode active (ie. both FD's off). As has been stated, FBW Airbi don't have CWS - the "manual control" is basically something like CWS but it doesn't hold pitch but vertical acceleration when the stick is centered.
Note, the B744 and the B757/767's with updated MCP's and AP's will hold current ATTitude if the AP is engaged with no F/D mode active (ie. both FD's off). As has been stated, FBW Airbi don't have CWS - the "manual control" is basically something like CWS but it doesn't hold pitch but vertical acceleration when the stick is centered.