Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Icing two questions.

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Icing two questions.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th February 2007 | 11:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: Brussels
Icing two questions.

  • Just looking at some Stats:

    AVTUR – Freezing point -47C

    Aviation Turbine Kerosene AVTUR- Freezing-50C

    JET A- Freezing point -47C

    I am told the fuel temp at high altitude drops to the minus 20’s, so why does one fuel need PRIST and the other not? Surely all fuels contain some dissolved water including JET A.
  • From an earlier thread why isn’t the
Tailplane heated?
160knots is offline  
Reply
Old 7th February 2007 | 11:44
  #2 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,138
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
If you are talking military Avtur on the tanker after the spec F40 or F34 you will normally see FSII after the F40 this means the fuel has fuel system icing inhibitor already blended into the fuel..

this may help

http://www.nato.int/docu/logi-en/1997/lo-15a.htm
NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 7th February 2007 | 12:27
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,188
Likes: 6
From: La Belle Province
* From an earlier thread why isn’t the Tailplane heated?
Assuming you're talking about de-icing/anti-icing, compared to the wing, it's all a question of the design necessity.

the performance implications of designing for ice on the wing are horrendous - significant reduction in maximum lift coefficient, affecting stall speed and hence all scheduled speeds (V2, Vref, etc) AND large amounts of drag. It's far more effective to take the hit in engine thrust associated with the bleed or power offtakes to power an anti-ice system for the wing, than it is to try to design an aircraft with no icing protection.

The tail, however, is usually a different story - it's more practical to design for ice on the tail than the wing; the drag implications are far less significant, as it's a much smaller surface, and the impact of reduced CLmax is much smaller - depending on other requirements, you may not even need to 'oversize' the tail. The case where tail de-/anti-icing is most commonly needed is the manual controls aircraft, because tail ice can significantly affect elevator hinge moments, and that can cause control problems. But an aircraft with hydraulically powered controls can usually cope with ice on the tail.

Caveat I'm talking in all cases about the en-route icing cases - typically the double-horned leading edge shapes. I am IN NO WAY advocating takeoffs with ice adhering to the tailplane on any aircraft.
Mad (Flt) Scientist is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.