Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

NG reverse during taxi

Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

NG reverse during taxi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Jan 2007, 19:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NG reverse during taxi

Boeing has changed the FCTM wording regarding this. It used to be; "Reverse thrust is not recommended during taxi". Presumably this was because of the FOD risk.
Now it says; "Reverse thrust above idle is not recommended during taxi".

So, what say you? Do you use idle reverse during taxi?
ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2007, 20:25
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do not have access to the latest FCOM but if so, it will be a useful option.
BOAC is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2007, 21:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ManaAdaSystem
Do you use idle reverse during taxi?
No. .
dolly737 is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2007, 06:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: California
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nope.

Some like to do this in corporate jets. I think they were raised in King Airs.
Stearperson is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2007, 06:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stearperson
Nope.
Some like to do this in corporate jets. I think they were raised in King Airs.
I used to resemble that remark.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2007, 07:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 10 west
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
we used to use ( occasionally ) thrust reversers on a citation...to save on brakes...at idle power only...but i see other corporate jets using them much more extensively...but prolonged and constant use of reversers might in the long run might be more expensive on reverser parts..??

the dean.
the dean is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2007, 09:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
perhaps now it is no longer required to shut an engine down to taxi in, in the event of a T/R stuck in the deply position on the 73 NG
Bolty McBolt is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2007, 09:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
required to shutdown on engine during taxi? When was that?
And yes,we are using reversers during long taxi,for ex in cdg where is also a nice slope.But if you read carefully the FCTM,it says reverse thrust ABOVE idle is not recommended.We are using only idle,which is just opening the reversers.
alexban is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2007, 09:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bolty McBolt
perhaps now it is no longer required to shut an engine down to taxi in, in the event of a T/R stuck in the deply position on the 73 NG
Does not make sense since the T/Rs utilize respective Hydraulic Systems for acutation under normal conditions.

Hydraulic pressure for the operation of engine No. 1 and engine No. 2 thrust reversers comes from hydraulic systems A and B, respectively. If hydraulic system A and/or B fails, alternate operation for the affected thrust reverser is available through the standby hydraulic system. When the standby system is used, the affected thrust reverser deploys and retracts at a slower rate and some thrust asymmetry can be anticipated.
captjns is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2007, 09:49
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In addition to the manufacturers' operating instructions, they may be amended to add additional operating restrictions such as desired by each specific operator.
captjns is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2007, 10:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,401
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
alexban,

"We are using only idle,which is just opening the reversers."

Sorry to be pedantic here but even at idle reverse you ARE reversing a thrust stream .... therefore you are getting reverse thrust of some sort, however minor. And its not as minor as you might imagine! I guess you have to be careful around places where there is dust, sand etc because all you are doing is stirring it up for your low-slung engines to reingest.
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2007, 10:19
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Europe-the sunshine side
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MrBernoulli ,you are not predantic,I was just stating that B says not to use reverse above idle.If idle was also dangerous it would've stated not to use it at all.
Due to the placement of the reversers on the engine it seems that idle reverse won't create much risk of FOD. Of course we won't use reversers on contaminated rwy's ,but if you use it when is dry snow you can see the effect of idle or above idle reverse.
alexban is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2007, 12:21
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South of the border
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From 320 FCOM (CFM's)

CAUTION

On taxiways, the use of reversers, even when restricted to idle thrust, may have the following effects :

-The engines may ingest fine sand and debris that may be detrimental to both the engines and the airframe systems.


-On snow covered areas, snow will recirculate into the air inlet, which may result in engine flame-out or roll back.


Except in an emergency, do not use reverse thrust to control aircraft speed while taxiing.
I know the thread was with ref to NG's, but thought Airbus's take on it could be of interest.
Dixons Cider is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2007, 05:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: OZ
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used the word "perhaps" as I have seen in years gone past CFM powered 737 classic taxi in with one engine shut down when reverser stuck deployed.
(I didnt ask which hyd sys powered the T/R)
I assumed as I am not licenced on type that with the T/R deployed engine idle would increase to flight idle making it a difficult taxi or it was to reduce FOD and jet blast for those arriving the aircraft on bay.

....Perhaps
Just thinking outside the box (cockpit)
Bolty McBolt is offline  
Old 24th Jan 2007, 10:43
  #15 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Commuting not home
Age: 46
Posts: 4,321
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by captjns
Does not make sense since the T/Rs utilize respective Hydraulic Systems for acutation under normal conditions.
If the reverser was stuck open, you'd had its engine shut down before stand to avoid causing havoc in the parking bay. No need to change this, it seems. But, I'm no longer rated on type.

FD
(the un-real)
FlightDetent is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.