Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

NG reverse during taxi

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

NG reverse during taxi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd January 2007 | 19:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 61
NG reverse during taxi

Boeing has changed the FCTM wording regarding this. It used to be; "Reverse thrust is not recommended during taxi". Presumably this was because of the FOD risk.
Now it says; "Reverse thrust above idle is not recommended during taxi".

So, what say you? Do you use idle reverse during taxi?
ManaAdaSystem is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd January 2007 | 20:25
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,575
Likes: 4
From: UK
I do not have access to the latest FCOM but if so, it will be a useful option.
BOAC is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd January 2007 | 21:47
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Originally Posted by ManaAdaSystem
Do you use idle reverse during taxi?
No. .
dolly737 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 06:05
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 1
From: California
Nope.

Some like to do this in corporate jets. I think they were raised in King Airs.
Stearperson is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 06:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
From: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Originally Posted by Stearperson
Nope.
Some like to do this in corporate jets. I think they were raised in King Airs.
I used to resemble that remark.
vapilot2004 is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 07:08
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: 10 west
we used to use ( occasionally ) thrust reversers on a citation...to save on brakes...at idle power only...but i see other corporate jets using them much more extensively...but prolonged and constant use of reversers might in the long run might be more expensive on reverser parts..??

the dean.
the dean is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 09:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: OZ
perhaps now it is no longer required to shut an engine down to taxi in, in the event of a T/R stuck in the deply position on the 73 NG
Bolty McBolt is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 09:40
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Europe-the sunshine side
required to shutdown on engine during taxi? When was that?
And yes,we are using reversers during long taxi,for ex in cdg where is also a nice slope.But if you read carefully the FCTM,it says reverse thrust ABOVE idle is not recommended.We are using only idle,which is just opening the reversers.
alexban is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 09:46
  #9 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: In a far better place
Originally Posted by Bolty McBolt
perhaps now it is no longer required to shut an engine down to taxi in, in the event of a T/R stuck in the deply position on the 73 NG
Does not make sense since the T/Rs utilize respective Hydraulic Systems for acutation under normal conditions.

Hydraulic pressure for the operation of engine No. 1 and engine No. 2 thrust reversers comes from hydraulic systems A and B, respectively. If hydraulic system A and/or B fails, alternate operation for the affected thrust reverser is available through the standby hydraulic system. When the standby system is used, the affected thrust reverser deploys and retracts at a slower rate and some thrust asymmetry can be anticipated.
captjns is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 09:49
  #10 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 2
From: In a far better place
In addition to the manufacturers' operating instructions, they may be amended to add additional operating restrictions such as desired by each specific operator.
captjns is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 10:06
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 38
From: Long ago and far away ......
alexban,

"We are using only idle,which is just opening the reversers."

Sorry to be pedantic here but even at idle reverse you ARE reversing a thrust stream .... therefore you are getting reverse thrust of some sort, however minor. And its not as minor as you might imagine! I guess you have to be careful around places where there is dust, sand etc because all you are doing is stirring it up for your low-slung engines to reingest.
MrBernoulli is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 10:19
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Europe-the sunshine side
MrBernoulli ,you are not predantic,I was just stating that B says not to use reverse above idle.If idle was also dangerous it would've stated not to use it at all.
Due to the placement of the reversers on the engine it seems that idle reverse won't create much risk of FOD. Of course we won't use reversers on contaminated rwy's ,but if you use it when is dry snow you can see the effect of idle or above idle reverse.
alexban is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 12:21
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: South of the border
From 320 FCOM (CFM's)

CAUTION

On taxiways, the use of reversers, even when restricted to idle thrust, may have the following effects :

-The engines may ingest fine sand and debris that may be detrimental to both the engines and the airframe systems.


-On snow covered areas, snow will recirculate into the air inlet, which may result in engine flame-out or roll back.


Except in an emergency, do not use reverse thrust to control aircraft speed while taxiing.
I know the thread was with ref to NG's, but thought Airbus's take on it could be of interest.
Dixons Cider is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 05:06
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: OZ
I used the word "perhaps" as I have seen in years gone past CFM powered 737 classic taxi in with one engine shut down when reverser stuck deployed.
(I didnt ask which hyd sys powered the T/R)
I assumed as I am not licenced on type that with the T/R deployed engine idle would increase to flight idle making it a difficult taxi or it was to reduce FOD and jet blast for those arriving the aircraft on bay.

....Perhaps
Just thinking outside the box (cockpit)
Bolty McBolt is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 10:43
  #15 (permalink)  

Only half a speed-brake
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 136
From: Commuting not home
Originally Posted by captjns
Does not make sense since the T/Rs utilize respective Hydraulic Systems for acutation under normal conditions.
If the reverser was stuck open, you'd had its engine shut down before stand to avoid causing havoc in the parking bay. No need to change this, it seems. But, I'm no longer rated on type.

FD
(the un-real)
FlightDetent is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.